United States
Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington,
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
☒ Filed by the Registrant | ☐ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant |
Check the appropriate box: | ||
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12 |
PUBLIC STORAGE
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply): | ||||
☒ | No fee required. | |||
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules |
701 Western Avenue
Glendale, California 91201
March 22, 202325, 2024
Dear Fellow Shareholders:
In 2022, we reached several important milestonesOur Company had another successful year in our Company’s history. First, we celebrated our 50th anniversary. During those first fifty years, we grew from a single development facility in El Cajon, California, to the most recognized brand in the self-storage industry, with nearly 2,900 properties serving 1.8 million customers in 40 states.
Second, we made2023, achieving record performance and making significant progress on theour organic and external growth strategy we announced at our first-ever Investor Day in 2021.strategies. We leveraged our iconic brand, unmatched scale and locations, four-factor external growth platform, growth-oriented balance sheet, and high-integrity and innovative culture to achieve record performance for our Company.
I am proud of what the best team in self-storage accomplished in 2022, including deliveringachieved record revenues of $4.2$4.5 billion and record net operating income of $3.1 billion; increasing$3.4 billion. We increased our portfolio by 5.913.9 million square feet through acquisitions, development, and redevelopment (with an estimated market value of $1.2$3.1 billion at stabilization);, including our successful acquisition and achievingintegration of Simply Self Storage—our largest private acquisition to date. We also achieved the highest direct operating margin and revenue per available square foot among public self-storage real estate investment trusts and record revenue per available square foot. We enhancedtrusts.
Operationally, we continued to enhance the customer experience and continued to transform our operating model.model, becoming the first public self-storage company to offer digital property access at 100% of our locations. We made significant progress on our sustainability efforts, and in 2023 we were pleased to be recognized as the U.S. self-storage leader on the GRESB benchmark. We also continued to take care of our team members,advanced employee growth and wedevelopment and are proud again to have been named a Great Place to Work®Work®. As we look forward to the next 50 years, Public Storage is poised to continue leading the self-storage sector.
Against this backdrop, weWe are pleased to invite you to attend our 20232024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting) on Tuesday, May 2, 2023,7, 2024, in Washington, DC.New York, NY. We hope that you will attend the meeting in person. We encourage you to designate the proxies named on the proxy card to vote your shares even if you are planning to come. This will ensure that your common stock isshares are represented at the meeting.
We furnish our proxy materials to shareholders primarily over the Internet. We believe this process expedites shareholders’ receipt of the materials, lowers the costs of the Annual Meeting, and conserves natural resources. The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement, and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available free of charge at https://materials.proxyvote.com/default.aspx?ticker=74460D.
Thank you for your continued support ofinterest in Public Storage. We look forward to seeing you at our Annual Meeting.
Sincerely,
Joseph D. Russell, Jr.
President and
Chief Executive Officer
NOTICE OF 20232024 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
March 22, 202325, 2024
To our shareholders:
On behalf of the Board of Trustees, I invite you to attend the 20232024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Annual Meeting) of Public Storage at 8:11:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 2, 2023,7, 2024, at The Ritz-Carlton Georgetown, 3100 Sthe Millennium Downtown New York, 55 Church Street, NW, Washington, DC 20007.New York, New York 10007.
Items of Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
Record Date
Close of business on March 13, 2023.5, 2024.
Proxy Materials
The Notice of Meeting, Proxy Statement, and Annual Report on Form 10-K are available free of charge at https://materials.proxyvote.com/default.aspx?ticker=74460D.
Sincerely,
Nathaniel A. Vitan
Senior Vice President,
Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
Important Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be Held on May 2, 2023:7, 2024: This Proxy Statement and our 20222023 Annual Report on Form 10-K are available at the Investor Relations section of our website, publicstorage.com.
Table of Contents
Page | ||||||
1 | ||||||
2 | ||||||
2 | ||||||
3 | ||||||
4 | ||||||
10 |
|
| ||||
11 | ||||||
12 | ||||||
13 | ||||||
13 | ||||||
14 | ||||||
15 | ||||||
16 | ||||||
17 | ||||||
18 | ||||||
23 |
| |||||
24 | ||||||
| ||||||
24 | ||||||
24 | ||||||
24 | ||||||
25 | ||||||
28 | ||||||
28 | ||||||
30 | ||||||
30 | ||||||
30 | ||||||
31 | ||||||
31 | ||||||
31 | ||||||
| 32 | |||||
32 | ||||||
33 | ||||||
36 | ||||||
37 |
|
| ||||
38 | ||||||
38 |
| |||||
39 |
|
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | i
Table of Contents
Page | ||||
40 |
| |||
40 | ||||
48 |
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | i
Table of Contents
ii | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Table of Contents
Page |
86 | ||||
87 | ||||
87 | ||||
A-1 |
|
| ||
A-2 |
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | iii
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY
This summary highlights information you will find in this proxy statement and does not contain all the information that you should consider. You should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.
20232024 ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION
|
|
|
| |||
Date and Time | Location | Record Date | Proxy Mail Date | |||
Tuesday,
11:00 a.m. Eastern Time |
| The Millennium Downtown New York 55 Church Street New York, New York 10007 |
March |
March | ||
Public Storage shareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote on the matters presented at the meeting.
Each common share, par value $0.10 per share (Common Stock)(common share), of the Company is entitled to one vote for
each trustee nominee and one vote on each of the other matters presented.
AGENDA AND VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS
Proposal Number | Item | Board | Vote Required | Page | ||||
1 | Election of Trustees | FOR Each Nominee | Majority of votes cast | 10 | ||||
2 | Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation of Named Executive Officers (NEOs) | FOR | Non-binding vote | 37 | ||||
3 | Ratify Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (EY) as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending December 31, 2024 | FOR | Majority of votes cast | 78 |
Proposal Number | Item | Board Recommendation | Vote Required | Page Reference | ||||
1 | Election of Trustees | FOR Each Nominee | Majority of votes cast | 14 | ||||
2 | Advisory Vote to Approve Compensation of Named Executive Officers (NEOs) | FOR | Non-binding vote | 41 | ||||
3 | Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes to Approve NEO Compensation | EVERY | Non-binding vote | 85 | ||||
4 | Ratify Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP (EY) as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2023 | FOR | Majority of votes cast | 87 | ||||
5 | A Shareholder Proposal Requesting that our Board of Trustees Issue Short- and Long-Term Scope 1-3 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets Aligned with the Paris Agreement | AGAINST | Majority of votes cast | 91 |
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 1
20222023 Highlights
2022 HIGHLIGHTS
20222023 Highlights
2023 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS
Under the leadership of our President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Joseph D. Russell, Jr., and the senior management team, we executed our opportunistic growth strategy and again achieved record performance in 2022 and successfully executed against the organic and external growth strategy detailed at our 2021 Investor Day (available on the Investor Relations section of our website at publicstorage.com).2023. During 2022, our 50th Anniversary year,2023, we focused on innovating acrossdeepening our business to enhance the storage experience ofpresence in growth markets, bolstering our customerscore strengths, and continue transforming our operating model.unlocking additional opportunities for growth and value creation. We also continued to opportunistically deploydeployed our growth-oriented balance sheet to generate external growth. Moreover,growth, including through our acquisition of Simply Self Storage—our largest private acquisition to date. In August 2023, we distributed $2.3 billion in special dividendscompleted a corporate reorganization into a holding company structure commonly referred to our shareholders in connection with PS Business Parks, Inc.’s sale to affiliates of Blackstone, Inc.as an umbrella partnership real estate investment trust (UPREIT), which we expect will facilitate future growth.
Record Financial Results, Unprecedented Multiyear Growth, and Superior Operating Performance
Record Revenues |
$4.2billion
|
| Record Net Operating Income(1) |
$3.1billion
| ||||
|
| |||||||
Portfolio addition through acquisitions, development, and redevelopment |
5.9million sq ft
|
| Est. market value of properties added (at stabilization) |
$1.2billion
| ||||
| ||||||||
Increase in portfolio square footage since 2019 |
26%
|
| Core FFO per Share Growth(1) |
23% | ||||
| ||||||||
80.2% Direct Operating Margin (Same Store) |
Highest
among self-storage REITs
|
| Record Revenue per Available Square Foot (Same Store) |
$20.61
|
| |||||||
Record Revenues | $4.5billion | Record Net Operating Income(1) | $3.4billion | ||||
| |||||||
Portfolio addition through acquisitions, development, and redevelopment |
13.9million sq ft | Est. market value of properties added (at stabilization) |
$3.1billion | ||||
| |||||||
Increase in portfolio square footage since 2019 | 35% | Core FFO per Share Growth(1) | 6%
| ||||
| |||||||
79.7% Direct Operating Margin (Same Store) | Highest among self-storage REITs | Record Revenue per Available Square Foot (Same Store) | $21.38
|
|
2 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
2023 Highlights
2022 Highlights
20222023 COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS
In 2022,2023, the Company continued its focus on improving customer and employee experiences while delivering record performance for shareholders, further positioning the Company to create long-term growth and increased shareholder value. The Company believes that 20222023 executive compensation was aligned with the Company’s strong performance.
The following is a summary of the Compensation and Human Capital (CHC) Committee’s decisions with respect to the key components of the 20222023 compensation program for our NEOs:
• Base Salaries. The CHC Committee increased base salaries for 2023 for our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial and Investment Officer, and our Chief Administrative Officer in light of their performance, increased roles and responsibilities, and market benchmarking. • 2023 Annual Cash Incentives. The 2023 annual cash incentive program was based on two criteria: (i) Core FFO growth (50% weighting), and (ii) individual management goals for each named executive officer based on the Company’s strategic objectives, including, among other things, goals related to the Company’s ongoing digital transformation efforts, continued portfolio growth, expanding the Company’s ancillary businesses, and strong employee engagement and succession planning. The goals for each criterion, including specific performance measures, were set by the CHC Committee at the start of the year. Based on the Company’s Core FFO growth and management’s performance against strategic goals, the CHC Committee awarded our NEOs their 2023 annual cash incentive on average at 108% of target. • Multi-Year Performance-Based RSUs. For 2023, the CHC Committee continued its practice of granting performance-based restricted stock units (RSUs) subject to a three-year performance period. The 2023 performance-based RSUs (March 2023 – March 2026 performance period) are based on the Company’s relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance as compared to both self-storage REIT competitors (weighted 60%) and S&P 500 Equity REITs (weighted 40%). • Multi-year Performance-Based Options. The CHC Committee also continued its practice of granting performance-based stock options subject to a three-year performance period. As with the 2023 performance-based RSUs, the 2023 performance-based options (March 2023 – March 2026 performance period) are based on the Company’s relative TSR performance as compared to both self-storage REIT competitors (weighted 60%) and S&P 500 Equity REITs (weighted 40%).
|
|
|
|
The CHC Committee believes that the foregoing 20222023 compensation decisions, which we discuss in more detail in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, beginning on page 44,40 of this proxy statement, strike the appropriate balance between rewarding management for their performance, incentivizing our leaders to continue creating long-term value, and attracting and retaining strong executives in a competitive labor market. The 2022 program also reflected changes made in response to shareholder feedback, including granting equity awards 100% based on multi-year relative performance.
SUSTAINABILITY FRAMEWORK
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 3
2023 Highlights
Corporate Responsibility and SUSTAINABILITY
Overview and Alignment with Company Strategy
We recognize the importance of operating in a responsible and sustainable manner that aligns with the Company’s long-term strategy and promotes the best interests of our Company and its stakeholders. For over 50 years, the Company’s corporate strategy has centered on one core philosophy: generate growth and create value by operating our properties and the Company for the long term.
Through this strategy, we have achieved:
|
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 3
2022 Highlights
|
|
|
|
The Company issues an annual Sustainability Report, which is available on our website at publicstorage.com, to provide transparent communication around our sustainability efforts, strategies, commitments, and progress. We will continue to keep long-term sustainable growth and value creation for our stakeholders at the forefront of our strategy and operations, and we willregularly communicate our ongoing efforts to mitigate the risks we face, including environmental, social, economic, political, data security and privacy, reputational, and other risks inrisks. In addition to capitalizingaddressing these risks, we seek out and capitalize on emerging sustainability-related opportunities.
For detailed information regarding our sustainability efforts, strategies, commitments, and progress, including with respect to environmental, social, and governance issues, please refer to our 2023 Sustainability Report, which is available on our website at publicstorage.com. Our 2023 Sustainability Report is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
Our Strategic Focus on Sustainable Long-Term Growth and Value Creation
We operate our business with a long-term focus, and our strategy prioritizes the Company’s resilience and performance in the decades to come.
4 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
2023 Highlights
The following framework underpins our sustainable long-term strategy:
| ||||||
ENVIRONMENTAL | SOCIAL | GOVERNANCE | ||||
OPERATIONS | ||||||
• Low environmental impact at property and corporate locations • Initiatives with a range of sustainability and economic benefits, landscaping, and efficient climate controls • Low property obsolescence and high resilience | • Focus on stakeholders, including employees, customers, communities, and investors • Company culture built on integrity, diversity and inclusion, accountability, entrepreneurship, and employee engagement and development • Cultural alignment with corporate strategy | • Comprehensive Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework • Robust risk management practices, including oversight, succession planning, • Pay-for-performance philosophy | ||||
| ||||||
CAPITAL ALLOCATION | ||||||
• Low capital expenditures needed to maintain properties • Efficient-system initiatives to reduce energy and water use, carbon • Redevelopment and adaptive reuse of older, less-efficient properties | • Community solar program helps provide clean energy to communities we serve • Portfolio growth strategy focused on supporting areas with economic and population growth • Serve | • Risk reduction via a culture of risk management accountability, portfolio geographic diversity, cloud-based operating systems, • Resource allocation towards sustainability strategy and communication efforts | ||||
BALANCE SHEET | ||||||
Low leverage, high permanent capital balance sheet |
4 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
2022 Highlights
Board Oversight andEngagement of Company Leadership
The Board’s commitment to effective oversight of the Company’s environmental, social, and governance (ESG)Our senior management team actively manages our risks and opportunities and to ensuring the Company’s progress across our sustainability initiatives is reflected in its allocation of oversight responsibilities among its standing committees, which responsibilities are regularly reviewed.
Currently, the Nominating, Governance, andopportunities. The Company has a dedicated Sustainability (NGS) Committee has formal responsibility for leading the Board’s oversight of ESG matters including: (i) supporting the Board in overseeing company-level ESG policies and in identifying and overseeing risks associated with ESG matters; (ii) overseeing the Company’s Environmental, Social, and Governance Steering Committee (ESG Committee) and overseeing and monitoring management’s efforts and activities on ESG initiatives, including any Company ESG performance goals; and (iii) overseeing the Company’s disclosure practices related to ESG matters, including our annual Sustainability Report.
The Board is supported in its oversight of the Company’s ESG risks and opportunities by the ESG Committee comprising our CEO and other senior executives across functions including executive management, enterprise risk management, audit, real estate, operations, human resources, finance, legal, construction, architecture,design, and investor relations. The ESGSustainability Committee assists the Company’s executive management in identifying the risks and opportunities we face, including with respect to climate change and human capital management; setting our general strategy relating to ESG matters;sustainability strategy; implementing initiatives and policies based on that strategy; overseeing communications with our stakeholders; and assessing developments relating to, and improving the Company’s understanding of, ESGsustainability matters.
The ESGSustainability Committee reports to and receives guidance from our Board, including through formal and informal meetings and interactions. This includes formal reporting to the NGSNominating, Governance, and Sustainability (NGS) Committee, Audit Committee, and CHC Committee, in addition to informalregular reporting to the rest of the Board. For a discussion of how our Board on a regular basis.and its committees oversee our sustainability program, see “Corporate Governance—Board Committees” below.
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 5
2023 Highlights
2022 Highlights
Our Environmental Practices
Leading the Self-Storage Sector in Environmental Stewardship
Public Storage considers potential environmental impacts—both positive and negative—negative environmental impacts in our decision-making across the business.
We are pleased to present the following highlights from our environmental stewardship efforts in 2022:
Further Reductions to Our Low Environmental Impact
For 50 years, we have built and operated our properties to stand the test of time.decision-making. We design our properties to have low obsolescence and high structural resilience, retaining functional and physical usefulness over many decades. This contrasts with other real estate types that require frequent reinvestment (i.e., capital expenditures) to stay current with consumer preference, remain competitive with newer construction, offset heavier wear-and-tear by users, and maintain structural operating efficiency.
Our property portfolioWe also has an inherently light environmental footprint, with carbon, water, and waste intensities that are on average 82% lower than other property types, including multifamily, office, industrial, and retail. Through our environmentally friendly capital initiatives, we have also achieved higher environmental efficiencies at our properties than our self-storage peers, emitting 27% less carbon per square foot and using 13% less water per square foot (on a same-store basis) than other public self-storage REITs.
6 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
2022 Highlights
All data for the year 2021.
|
|
Moreover, we have achieved significant reductions in our same-store carbon emission, water, and waste intensities as a result of our ambitious initiatives, including a 27% reduction in our Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions (on a like-for-like basis) since 2018:
Responsibly Addressing Climate Change
We support global efforts to mitigate the impact of climate change. Over the past several years, we have taken proactive measures to improve our understanding and management of risks and opportunities related to climate change.
We will continueare pleased to utilize our unique competitive advantages in furtheringpresent the following highlights from our environmental stewardship efforts and addressing the effects of climate change. Our commitment includes:in 2023:
Benchmarking | ||||||
| ||||||
|
|
| ||||
U.S. market sector leader | Achieved “A” rating | Top 6% of coverage universe | ||||
Significantlyincreased scoring across the | ||||||
|
| 2023 Winner Leader in the Light Award for superior and |
Solar power systems at nearly 450 | Water efficient landscaping at over 275 properties | LED lighting conversions completed across nearly 95% of owned portfolio |
28.6 GWh of Clean Energy generated by solar systems at our properties, saving CO2emissions equivalent to 2,251,099 gallons of gasoline consumed or 22,409,246 pounds of coal burned |
Reached 134 Green Building Certifications |
6 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 7
20222023 Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
We will continue to address matters relating to climate change and sustainability in a thoughtful and responsible manner, and we seek to identify and act upon opportunities and initiatives that make sense from both sustainability and financial return on invested capital perspectives.
Our Social Commitments to Our Stakeholders
Our commitment to our stakeholders—including employees, customers, communities, investors, and suppliers—underpins our long-term successes. We actively engage with stakeholders and incorporate their views into our decision-making. In a world that is increasingly interconnected with faster information dissemination, rapid innovation, quicker decisions, and rising risk, stakeholder focus is a critical strategy element for Public Storage.
Diversity and Inclusion
Diversity Statement: We are united under one common goal—committed to creating an inclusive and diversea workplace where all employees feel valued, included, and excited to be part of a best-in-class team. With nearly 5,900 team members from all different races, backgrounds, and life experiences, we celebrate inclusion and value the diversity each person brings to Public Storage. We believe our commitment tothat values diversity and inclusion, makes us a stronger companywhere every employee feels appreciated, respected, and instills a sensepart of pride across our teams and the customers we serve.
Our long-held belief in hiring the best has resulted in a diverse and inclusive workforce.team. Public Storage hires based on skills, personality, and experience without regard to age, gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristic. We are proud to have a diverse and inclusive workforce that reflects the diversity of the customers we serve.
Employee Base |
| 2023 Promotions | ||
|
|
|
|
|
65% | 53% |
| 69% | 53% |
Female | People of Color |
| Female | People of Color |
In addition, we disclose our annual Consolidated EEO-1 report, which reflects the race, ethnicity, and gender composition of our workforce on the Investor Relations section of our website at publicstorage.com. We also maintain policies regarding diversity, equal opportunity, pay-for-performance, discrimination, harassment, and labor (e.g., child forced, and compulsory)forced).
8 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
2022 HighlightsTraining and Development
Our commitment to fostering an environment where everyone feels valued and included extends not just throughout Public Storage but across the real estate industry. As one of the largest REITs—and the largest self-storage REIT—we are committed to leading the industry’s diversity and inclusion efforts. In this regard, in 2022, we made a founding donor contribution to the Nareit Dividends Through Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Giving Campaign. This initiative is directed at taking actionable and sustainable measures that support the recruitment, inclusion, development, and advancement of women, black professionals, other people of color, ethnically diverse individuals, and members of other under-represented groups in REITs and the publicly traded real estate industry. This follows our CEO’s signing of the CEO Action for Diversity and Inclusion pledge in 2021.
Development, Recognition, and Advancement
Our people power the Public Storage®Storage® brand. We empower all of our employees through our robust learning and development programs, which provideequip them with the skills, tools, and knowledge so they not onlyto help them grow as individuals but also contributeand professionally in their careers. We strive to the value of the organization through strong engagement.
Most ofconnect every employee to Public Storage’s mission, values, objectives, and strategy, and to ensure people feel engaged, supported, and inspired by their work and our new hires join us as Property Managers without any experiencecompany culture. We invest in the self-storage industry. Our hands-on new hire training program matches new hires with a Key Training Professional and provides close coaching and development from a District Manager. This equips our new teammates with the skills and confidence they need to manage a property within their first two weeks.
We have multiple career pathways for our property teams, and many choose to grow their entire career with us while learning new skills and taking on additional responsibility. Some choose to focus on developing people, many build their career around ensuring our customers receive exceptional service, and others pursue multi-unit property management. For those who enjoy the challenges that come with managing multi-unit portfolios and people, we offer our District Manager-in-Training program, which is a formal advancement program that equips participants with the skills they need to become successful District Managers at the Company.
Our experienced Learning and Development team leads our efforts to keep our employees informed, engaged, and motivated through relevant and timely training and development across all levels of the Company through multiple learning platforms and channels to ensure our employees grow “behind the orange doors.” We also have customized leadership programs and Company-wide communications. Givena leadership accelerator program focused on underrepresented groups, including women and diverse employees, each intended to enhance the geographically dispersed natureskills of our workforce, we ensure employees have access to the toolsfuture leaders.
Employee Well-Being and resources to be successful and develop critical skills that are relevant to a variety of careers.
|
|
|
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 9
2022 Highlights
|
Employee Health and Well-Being
Public Storage is committed to the total well-being of all our employees and provides resources to help them achieve their goals and support them in times of need. We provide comprehensive health plans,plan benefits to our employees and their dependents, including tools and resources designed to empower our employees to explore their options and to evaluate what they need to achieve a healthy and balanced lifestyle. We have also developed programs that promote taking steps towards a healthy lifestyle through encouragement and team support.
Employee Engagement
Employee engagement is fundamental to our understanding of the effectiveness of our human capital management strategies. We conduct various surveys that measureassess commitment, motivation, and engagement, as well as soliciting broader employee feedback, which we use to help us improve.
Each year, we conduct a formal employee survey to measure engagement. In 2022, 74% of our employees participated in our employee engagement survey, and we were pleased to see employee engagement of 76%. We are committed to continuous listening and improvement for our employees, and our feedback tools have guided enhancements for our employees, including the development of additional career progression opportunities and enhancements to our employee compensation and benefits programs.Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 7
2023 Highlights
Our employee engagement efforts have also led to recognition outside of Public Storage. We are proud to be named a Great Place to Work® and included onWork®, as rated by our employees, for the Forbes and Statista “America’s Best Large Employers” award list.second year in a row. We have also been recognized by Comparably, Inc. as a “Choice Employer” with an “A+” Culture Score based on employee responses across 18 culture metrics, among other recognitions.
|
|
10 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
2022 Highlights
Human Rights
A core value at Public Storage is treating individuals with dignity and respect inside our organization and throughout our supply chain. Respect for human rights is fundamental to our success and the communities where we operate. Employees are united by values that demonstrate our insistence on “doing the right thing.” Our commitment to human rights embodies and reflects these values as they influence everything we do and serve as the guiding principles that drive Public Storage every day.
Our Human Rights Policy is available on our website at publicstorage.com.
We are pleased to highlight the following additional commitments to our stakeholders:
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 11
2022 Highlights
Connecting with Our Communities
As the largest U.S. self-storage REIT, with operations in 40 states and every major metropolitan area, we have long been committed to giving back to the communities in which we operate. Our commitment to our communities is evident across our environmental initiatives to reduce energy, water, and waste intensities, our focus on diversity and inclusion, with an employee base that reflects the diversity of the communities we serve, and our guiding principle of “doing the right thing.” Many of our employees are active in our communities, including through volunteering their time and making charitable donations to organizations meaningful to them.
In 2022, we enhanced our commitment to our communities and our employees through the introduction of Public Storage Community Connects™. Public Storage Community Connects allows our employees to have a voice in selecting non-profit organizations throughout the communities we serve to which we make charitable contributions. For 2022, our employees helped select three non-profits across the country to receive our support in providing pediatric oncology, pediatric medicine, and other childcare and family services and support.
Responsible Governance Practices
Public Storage’s commitment to the highest ethical standards is the foundation of aan effective governance structure that provides oversight and accountability, promotes fairness and compliance, and proactively manages risk. GovernanceGood governance is critical to our operational, financial, and reputational resilience.
Our Board oversees senior management to ensure the long-term interests of the Company and our stakeholders are best served. Our trustees take a proactive, focused approach to their oversight responsibilities. Our corporate governance is structured to foster principled actions, informed and effective decision making, and appropriate monitoring of performance, risk, and compliance. Trustee decisions are governed by the Corporate Governance Guidelines and Trustees’ Code of Ethics, in addition to individual committee charters.
8 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
2023 Highlights
Key aspects of our governance include:
Company-Wide | Board Structure and Composition | ||
• Strong accountability and oversight • Pay-for-performance compensation philosophy •
Focus on legal and regulatory compliance • ERM program | • Declassified (annually elected) Board • 85% current independent trustees • Lead independent trustee • Separate Chairman and CEO positions • Active Board refreshment • All Audit Committee members are financial experts • Trustees may not serve on more than three public company boards (including the Board) without NGS Committee approval | ||
Shareholder Rights | Additional Practices | ||
• No poison pill • Right to call special meetings • Right to nominate trustees (proxy access) • Majority shareholder vote to amend charter and bylaws and to approve M&A transactions • Majority vote requirements for trustee elections | • Robust stock ownership guidelines • Clawback policy covering all compensation • Anti-hedging policy • No employment or severance agreements • Double-trigger equity vesting upon change of control • Political and charitable contributions policy |
12 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
2022 Highlights
Code of Conduct
Employees, executive management, and trustees must adhere and annually attest to our Code of Conduct, which includes policies and standards around personal, professional, and marketplace integrity; anonymous reporting of concerns; and protecting Company assets, records, and information.assets. The Code of Conduct also covers the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, antitrust and competition laws, anti-boycott laws, export control laws, insider trading laws, and equal opportunity, diversity, and anti-harassment standards. Executive management and trustees must also adhere to additional Codes of Ethics and Corporate Governance Guidelines.
Ongoing Board Refreshment
Our Board has demonstrated a commitment to board refreshment. Over one-third of our trustees, all independent, have served for less than threefour years.
As further described below under “Proposal 1: Election of Trustees,” beginning on page 15, our Board intends to decrease in size from fourteen to thirteen members effective at the Annual Meeting. The Board reached this determination, including the composition of the slate of nominees, by balancing a desire for a smaller, more efficient Board against a range of factors, including its commitment to refreshment, as well as the mix of skills, qualifications, and other attributes of the nominees.
Our Commitment
We are committed to a forward-looking andan integrated approach to sustainability across our organization. We strive to further reduce the Company’s environmental footprint while bolstering our resilience in the face of environmental, economic, political, data security, reputational, and other risks. We willseek to continually strengthen our unique competitive advantages in order to manage risk, create and act upon opportunity, and generate sustained long-term value for our stakeholders. Please refer to our Sustainability Report available on our website at publicstorage.com for additional information regarding our sustainability program, efforts, and commitment to our stakeholders.
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 139
Proposal 1:
Election of Trustees
Our Board has nominated | ||||||
RECOMMENDATION: Vote FOR each nominee |
1410 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF TRUSTEES
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Our Board has nominated thirteeneleven trustees for election at this year’s Annual Meeting to hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders.
Each of the thirteeneleven nominees has agreed to be named in this proxy statement and to serve on the Board if elected. We expect all nominees to attend the Annual Meeting.
If any of our nominees becomes unavailable to stand for election, the proxies named on the proxy card intend to vote your Common Stockcommon shares for the election of any substitute nominee proposed by the Board.
As discussed more fully below, the proposed slate of thirteeneleven nominees represents a reduction fromreflects the Board’s currentongoing consideration of the appropriate size of fourteen trustees and reflectsthe Board, consistent with the Board’s determination that reducing the size of the Board, while maintaining an appropriate mix of skills, experience, and personal qualities, creates an effective, well-functioning Board that serves the best interests of Public Storage and our shareholders. As a result of the Board’s ongoing deliberations, including consideration of the various other commitments of our trustees, the Board has nominated the eleven nominees listed on page 16, each of whom is a current trustee. The Board continues to evaluate its composition, including with respect to the diversity of our trustees’ professional experience, race, ethnicity, gender, age, and cultural backgrounds. The Board will be reduced in size to eleven trustees effective at the Annual Meeting.
The Board is responsible for overseeing management and providing sound governance on behalf of our shareholders. The Board and each of its committees have an active role in overseeing management of the Company’s risks, a responsibility that the Board believes is one of its most important areas of oversight.
The Board carries out its responsibilities through (1) the effective collaboration of our highly capable and experienced trustees; (2) a well-crafted Board structure, which includes separate individuals holding the positions of the CEO, the Chairman of the Board, and the Lead Independent Trustee; (3) a strong committee structure that enables trustees to provide the appropriate level of focused oversight and subject-matter expertise; and (4) adherence to our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Trustees’ Code of Ethics.
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 1511
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
BOARD COMPOSITION HIGHLIGHTS
Each of our nominees is a current trustee andtrustee. All nominees are well-qualified to serve on our Board based on education, experience, and personal qualities. Our trustees provide a variety of points of view that improve the quality of dialogue, contribute to a more effective decision-making process, and enhance overall culture in the boardroom. Our trustee-nominees represent a diversity of professional experience, race, ethnicity, gender, age, and cultural background, including:
2024 Trustee Nominees | ||
| ||
Independence | Gender Diversity | |
|
| |
Racial Diversity* | Age Diversity | |
Tenure**
|
|
| |||
Tenure** | |||
|
* Racial diversity includes self-identification as a member of an underrepresented community.16
** Average tenure is 8.4 years.
12 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
BOARD EVALUATIONS AND NOMINATIONS
In our annual Board evaluation and nomination process, the NGS Committee evaluates our trustees—individually and as a group—in light of the current needs of the Board and the Company. This annual evaluation process reviews the effectiveness of the Board, its committees, and trustees, with a focus on Board composition, culture, and administration. In addition, during the course of the year, the NGS Committee discusses Board succession and reviewsmay review potential trustee candidates. The NGS Committee has in the past retained third parties to assist in identifying potential nominees.
Our annual evaluation process involves assessments at the Board, Board committee, and individual trustee levels under the direction of the NGS Committee Chair and the Chairman of the Board. Each trustee completes an anonymous written questionnaire which is followed with an individual conversationand then meets individually with the NGS Committee Chair to review themes identified in the questionnaire responses to the questionnaires and discuss other evaluation topics. Following conclusion of the individual interviews, the NGS Committee Chair discusses with the NGS Committee the aggregated results of the written questionnaires and the NGS Committee Chair’sChair's conversations with individual trustees. The NGS Committee Chair also presents committee-specific feedback to each of the Audit Committee Chair and CHC Committee Chair and reports the results of the annual evaluation process to the full Board. This process assists theFeedback resulting from these evaluations is used to refine Board in determining the appropriate nominees for election based on current Company and Board needs.committee practices and improve Board, Board committee, and individual trustee performance. In addition, the NGS Committee takes into consideration its ongoing evaluation of potential new trustee candidatesthese evaluations when recommending athe slate of nominees for election to the Board at each annual meeting of shareholders.
As discussed more fully below under “Board Refreshment and Succession Strategy,”disclosed in our 2022 Board2023 annual meeting proxy statement, following the Board’s annual evaluation process confirmed a belief withinin 2022, the Board that the Board should be reduced inundertook to reduce its size over time to facilitate greater efficiency and effectiveness. The resultAt the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders, the Board reduced its size from fourteen to thirteen trustees. In connection with the Board’s subsequent deliberations is2023 annual evaluation process, the slateBoard continued to consider its size, including the impact any further reductions in size would have on the collective mix of thirteen nominees submitted for election at the Annual Meeting, reflecting a reduction in the Board’s size by one trustee while maintaining a robust mix ofour trustees’ skills, experience, and personal qualities. As a result of these deliberations, in early 2024, the Board determined to further reduce the size of the Board to eleven. The Board has nominated the eleven nominees listed on page 16, each of whom is a current trustee. The size of the Board will be reduced from thirteen to eleven trustees following the Annual Meeting.
The Board acknowledges that these further reductions to its size impact its composition, including with respect to the diversity of our trustees’ professional experience, race, ethnicity, gender, age, and cultural backgrounds. The Board is committed to considering these attributes as it continues to evaluate the appropriate composition of the Board. For further information on the Board’s focus on diversity, please see the “Board Focus on Diversity” section below, beginning on page 15.
BOARD QUALIFICATIONS
The NGS Committee has developed a matrix of skills to help assess the qualifications of trustee candidates, including:
•
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 13
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
•
The NGS Committee considers all thesethe relevant skills and attributes of each Board candidate with the goal of nominating a diverse slate of candidates with an appropriate combination of skills, experience, and personal qualities that will best serve the Board and its committees, our Company, and our shareholders.
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 17
Proposal 1: ElectionThe NGS Committee also considers each Board candidate’s competing commitments and responsibilities, including service on other corporate boards, with a view to confirming that such other commitments and responsibilities will not adversely impact the ability of TrusteesBoard candidates to satisfy the significant commitments required of our trustees.
BOARD REFRESHMENT AND SUCCESSION STRATEGY
Our Board and the NGS Committee understand the importance of Board refreshment. We aim to strike a balance between the knowledge and perspective that comescome from longer-term service on the Board with the new experience, ideas, and energy that can come from adding new trustees. We regularly consider whether the range of our Board’s tenureBoard appropriately encompassesincludes trustees who have valuable historic institutional knowledge of Public Storage and the competitive environment, complemented byas well as newer trustees with varied backgrounds, perspectives, and skills. As a result of our ongoing Board refreshment efforts, the average tenure of the thirteeneleven trustees submitted for re-election at the Annual Meeting is 6.78.4 years.
The NGS Committee takes a strategic approach to refreshment and succession planning. The NGS Committee’s approach includes considering the Company’s business strategy, regularly refining its list of the skills necessary for effective Company oversight over the short- and long-term, regularly assessing how the current Board meets these targeted skills, and identifying skills and backgrounds that should be bolstered by adding new trustees.
These ongoing strategic assessments are supported and informed by the rigorous annual evaluation process performed under the direction of the NGS Committee Chair and the Chairman of the Board at the Board, Board committee, and individual trustee levels.
We also consider any meaningful changes in the job responsibilities or business associations of a trusteeour trustees. As discussed more fully below under “Corporate Governance—Changes in the event of any such change. OurTrustee Responsibilities and Commitments” on page 32, our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Trustees’ Code of Ethics permit the NGS Committee to request that a trustee resign if such a change impairs the trustee’s effectiveness. The NGS Committee also takes into account anticipated trustee retirements as it considers its long-term Board composition goals. In addition, as part of our shareholder engagement dialogue, we have in the past discussed with our investors the composition and performance of our Board, and we will continue to do so upon request or as otherwise appropriate.
14 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
As noted above, our 2022 Board evaluation process confirmed the Board’s belief that the number of trustees should be reduced in order to facilitate a more efficiently-efficient and effectively-functioning Board.effective oversight and decision-making. Accordingly, beginning in late 2022 and continuing into earlythe Board reduced its size to thirteen trustees effective at the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders. Following the Board’s 2023 annual evaluation process, the NGS Committee, led by the NGS Committee Chair,in consultation with the Chairman of the Board, andfurther considered the Lead Independent Trustee, considered how best to reduce theappropriate size of the Board. The NGS Committee weighed the core trustee attributes, diversity qualities, andconsiderations, additional professional skills, experience, and knowledge, and the competing professional commitments of each of our existing trustees against the Board’s and Company’s perceived needs, the desired size of the Board, and other feedback identified through the 2022 BoardBoard’s annual evaluation process.processes.
After deliberation, the NGS Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board agreed, that the nominee slate should include the eleven nominees submitted for election at the Annual Meeting and that the size of the Board should be reduced in size to thirteen trusteeseleven effective at the Annual Meeting, as reflected in the slate of nominees submitted for election.meeting. Assuming the election of this year’s proposed trustee nominees, we believe we will have a good balance between tenured trustees with significant experience with the Company and newer trustees, with fresh perspectives. Theand that the proposed slate of nominees constituteswill constitute a strong, independent Board that will be well-positioned to navigate the current challenging business environment, and accelerate the Company’s growth, and support the accomplishment of key corporate objectives for the benefit of all of our stakeholders.
BOARD FOCUS ON DIVERSITY
Board succession and ensuring an appropriate diversity of views and experience are key focus areas for the NGS Committee and the Board. Our Board, including the nominees submitted for election at the Annual Meeting, reflects diverse perspectiveperspectives and a complementary mix of skills, experience, and
18 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
backgrounds that we believe are paramount to our ability to represent the interests of all stakeholders. Our Board recognizes the importance of diversity and supports management’s efforts to enhance all aspects of diversity throughout the Company.
Our trustee nominees, 85%82% of whom are independent, have a broad range of experience in varying fields, including real estate, finance, financial reporting, banking, international affairs, governance, marketing, retail, operations, legal, and cybersecurity/technology. A majority of our trustees hold or have held directorships at other U.S. public companies. FiveTwo of our trustee nominees, in addition to our Chairman and our CEO, have served as CEOs, and all have demonstrated superb leadership and analytical skills gained from deep experience in management, finance, and corporate governance.
FourThree of our trustee nominees are women (including, as of the date of the Annual Meeting, our Lead Independent Trustee and our Audit Committee chair), and four are racially diverse or self-identify as being from an underrepresented community. The Board acknowledges that the reduction of its size to eleven trustees will impact its gender diversity but expects that through its regular and ongoing refreshment efforts, its gender diversity will return to previous normalized levels.
Additionally, our Chairman and our CEO have provided meaningful in-person opportunities for the Board to interact with key members of management beyond our executive officers on a quarterly basis. Half of our current executive officers are diverse (including our Chief Administrative Officer (gender and racial) and Chief Legal Officer)Officer (racial)). Similarly, 52% of our nearly 5,900 employees are people of color and 67% of our employees are female.
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 1915
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
NOMINEE QUALIFICATIONS
The Board has nominated thirteeneleven trustees, all of whom are incumbents elected at our 20222023 annual meeting of shareholders.
We recommend that you vote FOR each nominee.
Nominee | Age | Principal Professional Background | Trustee Since | Committee Membership | ||||
Ronald L. Havner, Jr. | 65 | Chairman of the Board; Retired Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage | 2002 | |||||
Tamara Hughes Gustavson (Independent Trustee) | 61 | Real Estate Investor; Philanthropist | 2008 | |||||
Leslie S. Heisz (Independent Trustee)
| 62 | Retired Managing Director of Lazard Frères | 2017 | NGS | ||||
Shankh S. Mitra (Independent Trustee) | 42 | Chief Executive Officer of Welltower Inc. | 2021 | CHC | ||||
David J. Neithercut (Lead Independent Trustee) | 67 | Retired President and Chief Executive Officer of Equity Residential | 2021 | NGS | ||||
Rebecca Owen (Independent Trustee) | 61 | Retired President of CEI Realty Inc.; Former Chief Legal Officer of Clark Enterprises, Inc. | 2021 | Audit | ||||
Kristy M. Pipes (Independent Trustee) | 63 | Retired Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Deloitte Consulting | 2020 | Audit (Chair) and NGS | ||||
Avedick B. Poladian (Independent Trustee) | 71 | Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Lowe Enterprises, Inc. | 2010 | Audit and CHC (Chair) | ||||
John Reyes (Independent Trustee)
| 62 | Retired Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage | 2019 | |||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | 63 | President and CEO of Public Storage; Former Chief Executive Officer of PS Business Parks, Inc. | 2019 | |||||
Tariq M. Shaukat (Independent Trustee)
| 50 | President, Bumble | 2019 | Audit | ||||
Ronald P. Spogli (Independent Trustee) | 74 | Co-Founder of Freeman Spogli & Co.; Former Ambassador to the Italian Republic and the Republic of San Marino | 2010 | NGS (Chair) and CHC | ||||
Paul S. Williams (Independent Trustee) | 63 | Retired Partner at Major, Lindsey & Africa; Former President of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Chicago Chapter | 2021 | CHC and NGS |
Nominee | Age | Principal Professional Background | Trustee Since | Committee | ||||
Ronald L. Havner, Jr. |
| 66 |
| Chairman of the Board; Retired Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage |
| 2002 |
|
|
Tamara Hughes Gustavson (Independent Trustee) |
| 62 |
| Real Estate Investor; Philanthropist |
| 2008 |
|
|
| ||||||||
| ||||||||
Shankh S. Mitra (Independent Trustee) |
| 43 | Chief Executive Officer of Welltower Inc. | 2021 | CHC | |||
Rebecca Owen (Independent Trustee) |
| 62 | Retired President of CEI Realty Inc.; Former Chief Legal Officer of Clark Enterprises, Inc. | 2021 | Audit | |||
Kristy M. Pipes (Independent Trustee) |
| 64 | Retired Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Deloitte Consulting | 2020 | Audit (Chair) and NGS | |||
Avedick B. Poladian (Independent Trustee) |
| 72 |
| Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Lowe Enterprises, Inc. | 2010 | Audit and CHC (Chair) | ||
John Reyes (Independent Trustee) | 63 | Retired Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage | 2019 |
| ||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | 64 | President and CEO of Public Storage; Former Chief Executive Officer of PS Business Parks, Inc. | 2019 | |||||
Tariq M. Shaukat (Independent Trustee) | 51 | Co-Chief Executive Officer of Sonar, a privately held clean code solution provider | 2019 | Audit | ||||
Ronald P. Spogli (Independent Trustee) | 76 | Co-Founder of Freeman Spogli & Co.; Former Ambassador to the Italian Republic and the Republic of San Marino | 2010 | NGS (Chair) and CHC | ||||
Paul S. Williams (Independent Trustee) | 64 | Retired Partner at Major, Lindsey & Africa; Former President of the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) Chicago Chapter |
| 2021 | CHC and NGS |
20
16 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
TRUSTEE NOMINEES SKILLS SUMMARY
The Board believes that our trustee nominees provide Public Storage with the combined skills, experience, and personal qualities needed for an effective and engaged Board.
Management or Crisis Management Experience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Planning/Human Capital Management Experience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer Facing/Retail Experience |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Global Company Board Experience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legal Experience | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
* Includes self-identification as being from an underrepresented community.
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 2117
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
TRUSTEE NOMINEE BIOGRAPHIES
| Ronald L. Havner, Jr. Chairman | ||||
Age: 66
Trustee since: 2002 | Mr. Havner joined the Board in November 2002 and has served as Chairman since August 2011. Mr. Havner served as Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage from November 2002 until his retirement on January 1, 2019. Mr. Havner joined Public Storage in 1986 and held a variety of senior management positions prior to becoming Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Havner Key Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Havner’s qualifications for election to the Board include his extensive leadership experience and Company and industry knowledge. Having served at Public Storage for almost 40 years, including 17 years as Chief Executive Officer, |
| Tamara Hughes Gustavson Real Estate Investor; Philanthropist | ||||
Age: 62 Trustee since: 2008 Independent Trustee | Ms. Gustavson joined the Board in November 2008. She was previously employed by Public Storage from 1983 to 2003, serving most recently as Senior Vice President, Administration. During the past Ms. Gustavson currently serves Key Reasons for Nomination: Ms. Gustavson’s qualifications for election to the Board include her |
|
22
18 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
|
| ||||
| Shankh S. Mitra Chief Executive Officer of Welltower Inc. | ||||
Age: 43 Trustee since: 2021 Independent Trustee Committees: CHC | Mr. Mitra joined the Board in January 2021. He has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Welltower Inc. Mr. Mitra has served as a director of Welltower Inc. since October 2020. Key Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Mitra’s qualifications for election to the Board include his extensive experience |
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 23
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
|
| ||||
| Rebecca Owen Retired President of CEI Reality, Inc.; Former Chief Legal Officer of Clark Enterprises, Inc. | ||||
Age: 62 Trustee since: 2021 Independent Trustee Committees: Audit | Ms. Owen joined the Board in January 2021. Ms. Owen has served as the Chairman and founder of Battery Reef, LLC, a commercial real estate investment and management company, since January 2019. From 1995 until January 2019, she served in various roles at Clark Enterprises, Inc., a private investment firm, and its affiliated companies, including as President and Chief Investment Officer of CEI Realty, Inc., the real estate investment arm of Clark Enterprises, Ms. Owen has served on the Board of Directors of Willscot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. (NASDAQ: WSC) Key Reasons for Nomination: Ms. including as President of a large, diversified, private real estate firm, her significant financial, risk management, and legal expertise, and, through her board experience, her valuable insight into human resources and corporate governance matters. |
24 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 19
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
| Kristy M. Pipes Former Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Deloitte Consulting | ||||
Age: 64 Trustee since: 2020 Independent Trustee Committees: Audit (Chair) NGS | Ms. Pipes joined the Board in October 2020. Ms. Pipes previously served as Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer of Deloitte Consulting, Ms. Pipes joined the Board of Directors of AECOM (NYSE: ACM) in Key Reasons for Nomination: Ms. career, as well as cybersecurity and data privacy experience. |
| Avedick B. Poladian Retired Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Lowe Enterprises | ||||
Age: 72 Trustee since: 2010 Independent Trustee Committees: CHC (Chair) Audit | Mr. Poladian joined the Board in February 2010. From 2007 to the end of 2016, Mr. Poladian held the positions of Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for Lowe Enterprises, a diversified national real estate company that he joined in 2003. Mr. Poladian was with Arthur Andersen from 1974 to 2002 as Managing Partner, Pacific Southwest.
Key Reasons for Nomination: Mr. |
20 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 25
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
| John Reyes Retired Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage | ||||
Age: 63 Trustee since: 2019 Independent Trustee | Mr. Reyes joined the Board in January 2019. Mr. Reyes served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage from 1996 until his retirement effective January 1, 2019. Mr. Reyes joined Public Storage in 1990 and served in various positions until his promotion to Chief Financial Officer in 1996. From 1983 to 1990, Mr. Reyes was employed by EY as a Certified Public Accountant. Key Reasons for Nomination:
|
| Joseph D. Russell, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage | ||||
Age: 64 Trustee since: 2019 | Mr. Russell joined the Board in January 2019. Mr. Russell has been President of Public Storage since July 2016 and has served as its Chief Executive Officer since January 1, 2019. Previously, Mr. Russell was President and Chief Executive Officer of PS Business Parks (previously listed on the NYSE) from August 2002 until July 2016. Mr. Russell served on the Board of Directors of PS Business Parks from August 2003 until its sale in July 2022. Mr. Russell serves on the Executive Committee of the Board of Governors of Key Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Russell’s qualifications for election to the Board include his leadership experience and Company and industry knowledge, including his almost 30-year involvement with publicly traded REITs and extensive experience with self-storage |
26 |
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 21
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
Tariq M. Shaukat Co-Chief Executive Officer of Sonar | ||||
Age: Trustee since: 2019 Independent Trustee Committees:
|
|
| Mr. Shaukat joined the Board in July 2019. He has been co-Chief Executive Officer of Sonar, a clean code solution provider, since August 2023. Prior to that, Mr. Shaukat was President of Bumble Inc. Mr. Shaukat Key Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Shaukat’s qualifications for election to the Board include his extensive digital, marketing, technology, cybersecurity, and data analytics experience. In addition, Mr. Shaukat brings international experience and his proven leadership and unique perspective to the Board. |
| Ronald P. Spogli Co-Founder of Freeman Spogli & Co.
| ||||
Age: 76 Trustee since: 2010 Independent Trustee Committees: NGS (Chair) CHC | Mr. Spogli joined the Board in February 2010. Mr. Spogli co-founded Freeman Spogli & Co. (Freeman Spogli), a private investment firm dedicated to middle-market companies positioned for growth, in 1983. Freeman Spogli has invested over Mr. Spogli also serves on the Board of Overseers of the Hoover Institution at Stanford University and on the Boards of Trustees of the W. M. Keck Foundation, the Center for American Studies in Rome, Italy, and White Bridge Investments, an Italian investment company. Previously, Mr. Spogli served as the Vice Chair of The J. Paul Getty Trust. Key Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Spogli’s qualifications for election to the Board include investing and investment management expertise and his broad-ranging board and executive |
22 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 27
Proposal 1: Election of Trustees
| Paul S. Williams Retired Partner, Major, Lindsey & Africa
| ||||
Age: 64 Trustee since: 2021 Independent Trustee Committees: CHC NGS | Mr. Williams joined the Board in January 2021. Mr. Williams served as a Partner and Managing Director of Major, Lindsey & Africa, LLC, an executive recruiting firm, from 2005 to 2018. He also served as Director of Global Diversity Search, assisting legal organizations in enhancing their diversity. Mr. Williams is the immediate past President of the Chicago Chapter of the National Association of Corporate Directors. From 2001 through 2005, Mr. Williams served as Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary of Cardinal Health, Inc. (NYSE: CAH), a provider of products and services to healthcare providers and manufacturers. Mr. Williams has served on the Board of Directors of Air Transport Services Group (NASDAQ: ATSG), a provider of aircraft leasing and air cargo transportation and related services, since January 2021. Since early 2020, Mr. Williams Previously, Mr. Williams served on the Boards of Directors of Compass Minerals (NYSE: CMP), a producer of salt, plant nutrients, and magnesium chloride for distribution primarily in North America, from June 2009 until his retirement in February 2023, and Romeo Power, Inc. (NYSE: RMO), an energy technology company, from December 2020 until completion of its sale to Nikola Corporation in October 2022. Additionally, Mr. Williams served as a director of Essendant, Inc. (NASDAQ: ESND), a Key Reasons for Nomination: Mr. Williams’s qualifications for election to the Board include his corporate governance and human capital management expertise, including with respect to talent development and diversity and inclusion, and his extensive legal experience. |
VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION
For the election of trustees, trustee nominees receiving an affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting will be elected. For purposes of the vote on this proposal, abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the vote.
The Board recommends voting FOR all trustee nominees.
28 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 23
Corporate Governance
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
BOARD ENGAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT
Our Board has beenis a critical resource for senior management and has providedprovides invaluable insight and oversight, including as senior management formulated and implemented the organic and external growth strategy the Company shared at its 2021 Investor Day.oversight. The Board and our senior leadership team engage regularly and collaborate closely to ensure the Company meets its commitments to all stakeholders, including our employees, customers, and our shareholders.
One of the Board’s highest priorities continues to be guiding the development and execution of the Company’s long-term strategy. The Board remains focused on working with management to develop strategies to accelerate growth and create long-term value for our shareholders.
GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
Our Board oversees our CEO and other senior management to ensure that the long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders are best served. We expect our trustees to take a proactive, focused approach to executing their oversight responsibilities.
Our governance structure is designed to foster principled actions, informed and effective decision-making, and appropriate monitoring of performance, risk, and compliance. Our key governance documents, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Trustees’Trustee’s Code of Ethics, Code of Conduct, Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers, and our committee charters, are available on the Investor Relations section of our website at publicstorage.com or by writing to Public Storage, 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201, Attention: Corporate Secretary. We will disclose any substantive amendments to or waivers of any of our ethics policies and standards on our website and in accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) requirements.
BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE
One of the Board’s key responsibilities is to determine the optimal leadership structure to provide effective oversight of management. As a result, the Board does not have a policy as to whether the roles of Chairman and CEO should be separated or combined. The Board believes that Public Storageour shareholders are best served when the Board has flexibility to consider the relevant facts and circumstances to ensure that the Board leadership structure best reflects the needs of the Company at that time.
Prior to January 1, 2019, when Ronald L. Havner, Jr., retired as CEO, the roles of Chairman and CEO were combined and held by Mr. Havner. Upon Mr. Havner’s retirement, the Board determined that he would remain Chairman of the Board, and the roles of Chairman and CEO have been separately held by Mr. Havner and Mr. Russell, respectively, since January 1, 2019.
The Chairman typically attends our annual meeting of shareholders and has the powerauthority to call special meetings of shareholders. The Chairman also has the powerauthority to call meetings of the Board and act as chairman of such meetings.meetings of the Board. In addition to conversations our Chairman has with shareholders at our annual meetings, the Chairman may also participate in informal meetings with shareholders. The Chairman regularly engages with the CEO, Lead Independent Trustee, chairs of Board committees, and other members of the Board regarding issues related to Board structure. The Chairman also assists the CHC Committee with the annual performance review of our CEO.
24 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 29
Corporate Governance
Our Board established the position of Lead Independent Trustee in 2011 to provide for an independent leadership role on the Board when the roles of Chairman and CEO are combined or when the Chairman is otherwise not independent. Notwithstanding that the Chairman and CEO roles were separated on January 1, 2019, we maintain the Lead Independent Trustee role as a matter of good corporate governance and to bolster the independence of the Board.
We describe more fully the role of the Lead Independent Trustee in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.Guidelines and Trustees’ Code of Ethics. Among other things, the Lead Independent Trustee presides at all executive sessions of the independent trustees, and assists in the recruitment and selection of new trustees. When the roles of Chairmantrustees, and CEO are combined, the Lead Independent Trustee assists the CHC Committeeconsults with the annual performance reviewCEO on strategic planning and other issues when the CEO and Chairman roles are combined.
Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Trustees’ Code of Ethics, our CEO. Our Lead Independent Trustee is appointed to serve one or more successive three-year terms. David J. Neithercut who was appointed inhas served as our Lead Independent Trustee since January 2021. Following the conclusion of Mr. Neithercut’s prior experienceterm as chief executive officer of a large publicly-traded REIT, including with respect to risk oversight, is particularly valuable in his role astrustee effective at the Annual Meeting, the Board will appoint a new Lead Independent Trustee. The Board currently anticipates that Kristy M. Pipes will be appointed to this role. As Chair of the Audit Committee, Ms. Pipes is an effective leader on the Board, and she would bring her extensive management, leadership, and risk management experience to the position of Lead Independent Trustee. We intend to announce all Board leadership and committee composition changes following the Annual Meeting.
BOARD COMMITTEES
The three standing committees of the Board are the Audit, Compensation,CHC, and NGS Committees. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit, CHC, and NGS Committees is independent in accordance with NYSE rules.
Each committee has a charter that generally states the purpose of the committee and outlines the committee’s structure and responsibilities. Each committee reviews the adequacy of its charter annually. The following lists the number of meetings held by each committee in 2022:2023:
Committee | ||
| Number of | |
| ||
Audit | 7 | |
Compensation and Human Capital | ||
6 | ||
Nominating, Governance, and Sustainability | 5 | |
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 25
Corporate Governance
In connection with the reduction in the size of the Board effective at the Annual Meeting, we expect the composition of our committees to change following the meeting. We intend to announce all Board leadership and committee composition changes following the Annual Meeting. The current membership and primary areas of responsibility of our Board committees are as follows:
Audit Committee
Members: Kristy M. Pipes (Chair), Rebecca Owen, Avedick B. Poladian, and Tariq M. Shaukat
•
•
•
•
•
•
30 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance
Compensation and Human Capital Committee
Members: Avedick B. Poladian (Chair), Michelle Millstone-Shroff, Shankh S. Mitra, Ronald P. Spogli, and Paul S. Williams
•
•
•
26 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
|
Corporate Governance
•
•
•
•
•
Nominating, Governance, and Sustainability Committee
Members: Ronald P. Spogli (Chair), Leslie S. Heisz, David J. Neithercut, Kristy M. Pipes, and Paul S. Williams
•
•
•
•
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 31
Corporate Governance
Conducts preliminary reviews of trustee independence
•
•
•
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 27
Corporate Governance
•
•
•
•
•
PROXY ACCESS
Our Amended and Restated Bylaws (Bylaws) provide for proxy access, thereby giving our shareholders an even greater voice in trustee elections. A shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least 3% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stockcommon shares continuously for at least three years may include in our proxy materials trustee nominees constituting up to the greater of two trustees or 20% of the number of trustees on the Board, provided that the shareholder and the nominees satisfy the eligibility requirements in our Bylaws. There are no qualifying shareholder nominations for inclusion in our proxy statement.
BOARD’S ROLE IN RISK OVERSIGHT
Our Board is responsible for overseeing our Company-wide approach to the identification, assessment, and management of short-term, intermediate-term, and long-term risks facing the Company. The Board recognizes its responsibility for overseeing the assessment and management of risks that may threaten successful execution of our long-term strategies, and the Board consults with outside advisors and experts when necessary. All of our trustees bring risk management experience from their principal occupation or other professional experience, including service on other boards and attendance at pertinent seminars and director education programs.
The Board’s risk management processes include a comprehensive ERM framework focused on:
•
•
32 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance
providing the Board with a measurable way to exercise its oversight responsibilities over the Company’s risk assessment and risk management efforts.
Critical components of our risk oversight framework include regular assessments among risk owners to identify and assess key risks facing the Company. Our executive team calibrates risk owner assessments across each of our key risk categories and leads efforts to identify
28 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance
mitigation controls to reduce the Company’s exposure to risks. Our board and its committees regularly receive presentations from management on risks to the business. Additionally, all trustees have access to members of management if a trustee wishes to follow up on items discussed outside of the Board or committee meeting.
To ensure our risk profile is appropriately reflected in our public disclosures, members of our legal and finance teams, as well as our Vice President, Enterprise Risk, and Compliance, participate in quarterly meetings with the Audit Committee regarding risk oversight.
Oversight for certain specific risks falls under the responsibilities of our Board committees. The committees regularly advise the full Board of their oversight activities.
The Audit Committee focuses on financial, reputational, legal, information security, and other risks affecting the Company. The Audit Committee also discusses the Company’s policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management. The Audit Committee engages quarterly with members of management, including from the finance, legal, enterprise risk and compliance, information technology, and internal audit functions, as well as external experts as appropriate, to assess the risk environment, including current and anticipated risks, and the Audit Committee in turn provides reports to the full Board.
|
|
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee focuses on risks related to our compensation program, including evaluating appropriate compensation incentives relating to the compensation of our executives and employees, our human capital, and management succession matters.
|
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 33
Corporate Governance
In connection with preparing the report for the CHC Committee’s consideration, members of our senior management team, including our CEO and Chief Administrative Officer, reviewed the target metrics for all of our employee incentive compensation
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 29
Corporate Governance
plans. At the completion of the review, management and the CHC Committee concluded that our incentive compensation plans did not create undue risks for the Company.
The Nominating, Governance, and Sustainability Committee focuses on risks associated with succession planning, corporate governance, Board effectiveness, ESG, and public policy matters, including political and charitable contributions. The NGS Committee also supports the Board in identifying and overseeing risks associated with ESG and sustainability matters and, as appropriate, coordinates with other Board committees on such matters (such as the CHC Committee with respect to ESG-relatedsustainability-related compensation metrics and social and human capital issues and the Audit Committee with respect to internal controls regarding ESGsustainability reporting).
Our Board and Board committees regularly receive presentations from management on risks to the business. Additionally, all trustees have access to members of management if a trustee wishes to follow up on items discussed outside of the Board or committee meeting.CYBERSECURITY
CYBERSECURITY
Public Storage devotes significant resources to protecting and continuing to improve the security of our computer systems, software, networks, and other technology assets. Our security efforts are designed to preserve the confidentiality, integrity, and continued availability of all information owned by, or in the care of, the Company and protect against, among other things, cybersecurity attacks by unauthorized parties attempting to obtain access to confidential information, destroy data, disrupt or degrade service, sabotage systems, or cause other damage. We are also committed to compliance with applicable data privacy requirements, and, in this regard, our data security program is supported by policies and procedures, as well as third party contractual provisions, directed at protecting the privacy of our, our customers’, and our employees’ data.
Board Oversight
Our Board considers cybersecurity risk one of the most significant risks to our business. The Board has delegatedassigned to the Audit Committee the task of assisting it in its oversight of cybersecurity and other information technology risks affecting the Company. The Audit Committee periodically evaluates our cybersecurity strategy to ensure its effectiveness. Management provides quarterly reports to the Audit Committee regarding cybersecurity and other information technology risks, and the Audit Committee in turn provides reports to the full Board.
As part of our Board refreshment efforts in recent years, we have focused on adding trustees with information technology skills. Currently, sixSeveral members of our Board, including all four members of our Audit Committee, have cybersecurity experience from their principal occupation or other professional experience. In addition, several members of our Board and Audit Committee have received or are pursuing various board-level cybersecurity certifications, such as the NACD Cyber-Risk Oversight certification and the Digital Directors Network certification on Cyber Risk Governance for Public Company Corporate Directors. Several trustees have also attended third-party director education courses on cybersecurity, including cyber risk governance, and data privacy issues and trends in the last year.
34 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance
Cybersecurity Risk Identification and Management
A dedicated team of technology professionals works throughoutPlease see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year to monitor all matters of risk relating to cybersecurity. Our Chief Technology Officer andended December 31, 2023 for more information on our Vice President, Management Information Systems, oversee our information security program and report to our executive management team through our Chief Administrative Officer. Their teams are responsible for leading enterprise-wide cyber resilience strategy, policy, standards, architecture, and processes.
We identify and address information security risks by employing a defense-in-depth methodology, consisting of both proactive and reactive elements, that provides multiple, redundant defensive measures and prescribes actions to take in case a security control fails or a vulnerability is exploited. We leverage internal resources, along with strategic external partnerships, to mitigate cybersecurity threats to the Company. We have partnerships for Security Operations Center (SOC) services, penetration testing (PENTEST), incident response (IR), and various third-party assessments. We deploy both commercially available solutions and proprietary systems to manage threats to our information technology environment actively.
Our cybersecurity oversight infrastructure is part of our internal control environment, and our controls include information security standards. In addition, we are certified against top information security standards, specifically the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), to ensure we comply with this rigorous standard specifically for the safe handling and protection of credit card data. Annually, we are assessed, either internally or by an independent third-party, against the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cyber Security Framework. We also have policiesprocesses and procedures to overseefor addressing and identify themanaging cybersecurity risks associated with our use of third-party service providers, including the regular review of SOC reports, relevant cyber attestations, and other independent cyber ratings. These processes include technical controls and processes, as well as contractual mechanisms to mitigate risk. Additionally, throughout the year, we utilize reports prepared by our external partners, which provide an independent ranking of our cybersecurity maturity and coverage, to assess our cyber proficiency on a standalone basis and comparatively against peers and other companies. Our cyber proficiency consistently ranks as “advanced.” We also regularly engage appropriate external resources regarding emerging threats to navigate the diverse cybersecurity landscape.
In addition to ensuring adequate safeguards are in place to minimize the chance of a successful cyber-attack, the Company has established well-defined response procedures to address any cyber event that may occur despite these robust safeguards. These response procedures are designed to identify, analyze, contain, and remediate such cyber incidents to ensure a timely, consistent, and compliant response to actual or attempted data incidents impacting the Company. Each year, the Company tests these response procedures, including through disaster response and business continuity plan exercises, in our continuous effort to adapt to the evolving threat landscape. These exercises are intended to challenge and validate our information security response and resources through simulated cybersecurity incidents, including engagement of outside cybersecurity legal counsel, other third party partners, executive management, and our Board.
The Company takes data protection seriously and ensures every employee understands their role in keeping Public Storage safe from cyber-attacks. We employ a robust information security and training program for our employees, including mandatory computer-based training, regular internal communications, and ongoing end-user testing to measure the effectiveness of our information security program. As part of this commitment, we require our employees to complete a Cybersecurity Awareness eCourse and acknowledge our Information Security policy each year. In addition, we have an established schedule and process for regular phishing awareness campaigns that are designed to
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 35
Corporate Governancerisks.
emulate real-world contemporary threats and provide immediate feedback (and, if necessary, additional training or remedial action) to employees.
We have experienced no material information security breaches in the last three years. As such, we have not spent any material amount of capital on addressing information security breaches in the last three years, nor have we incurred any material expenses from penalties and settlements related to a material breach during this same time.
We believe we are adequately insured against losses related to a potential information security breach, and we maintain cybersecurity insurance coverage that we believe is appropriate for the size and complexity of our business.
POLITICAL AND CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS
Our NGS Committee oversees the Company’s political and charitable contributions and other public policy matters. In order to facilitate accountability and informed decision-making with respect to the Company’s political contributions, the NGS Committee has adopted Political and Charitable Contributions Guidelines that apply to contributions or expenditures of corporate funds to various political entities, charitable organizations, and certain causes. Contributions subject to the Political and Charitable Contributions Guidelines must be approved by a management committee and/or the NGS Committee. Decisions are made based on, among other things, a determination that the amount and recipient are aligned with the Company’s strategy, values, policies, and business objectives, and are made without regard for the private political preferences of officers or trustees. All contributions are required to be reported quarterly to the NGS Committee.
BOARD ORIENTATION AND EDUCATION
Each new trustee participates in an orientation program and receives materials and briefings concerning our business, industry, management, and corporate governance policies and
30 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance
practices. We provide continuing education for all trustees through board materials and presentations, including third-party presentations, discussions with management, and the opportunity to attend external board education programs. In addition, all Board members have access to resources of the National Association of Corporate Directors through a Company membership.
TRUSTEE INDEPENDENCE
We require that a majority of the Board be independent in accordance with NYSE rules. To determine whether a trustee is independent, the Board must affirmatively determine that there is no direct or indirect material relationship between the Company and the trustee.
|
|
Corporate Governance
|
COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE BOARD
Shareholders and interested parties can communicate with any of the trustees, individually or as a group, by writing to them in care of Corporate Secretary, Public Storage, 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201. We will forward each communication intended for the Board and received by the Corporate Secretary related to the operation of the Company and not otherwise commercial in nature to the specified party following its clearance through normal security procedures.
TRUSTEE ATTENDANCE
The Board held sevenfourteen meetings in 2022,2023, including telephonicvideoconference meetings. We do not have a policy regarding trustee attendance at the annual meeting of shareholders, but expect trustees to attend. All of our trustees serving on the Board at that time attended the 20222023 annual meeting of shareholders. Each trustee attended at least 75% of the aggregate number of Board meetings and committee meetings for the committees on which they served, if any.
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 31
Corporate Governance
Changes in Trustee Responsibilities and Commitments
Service on the Board requires significant time and attention, and trustees are expected to spend the time needed and meet as often as necessary to discharge their responsibilities. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Trustees’ Code of Ethics, a trustee whose job responsibilities or business associations change from those he or she held when most recently elected or appointed to the Board shall notify the Chair of the NGS Committee of the change. If the NGS Committee determines that the change and the circumstances giving rise to the change are likely to impair the trustee’s effectiveness, the NGS Committee may ask the trustee to tender his or her resignation or decide not to renominate the trustee for election at the next annual meeting of shareholders.
Additionally, trustees are required to advise the Chair of the NGS Committee before accepting membership on other corporate boards. If the NGS Committee determines that the membership is likely to impair the trustee’s effectiveness, the NGS Committee may ask the trustee to tender his or her resignation or decide not to renominate the trustee for election at the next annual meeting of shareholders. Commencing February 23, 2024, without specific approval from the NGS Committee, no trustee may accept membership on another public company board if it will result in the trustee serving on more than three public company boards, including the Board.
TRUSTEE AND EXECUTIVE OFFICER Stock OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
Pursuant to the Board’s stock ownership guidelines, we expect each trustee to beneficially own common shares or common share equivalents of the Company equal in market value to five times the amount of the annual cash retainer for Board member service. The Board increased this guideline to five times from three times the amount of the annual cash retainer effective February 2024. Each non-management trustee shall attain his or her ownership within five years from the date of election or appointment.
Pursuant to the stock ownership guidelines applicable to our executive officers, our CEO is expected to beneficially own common shares or common share equivalents equal in value to six times his or her base salary and our other executive officers are expected to beneficially own common shares or common share equivalents equal in value to four times their base salary, in each case within five years of appointment or promotion. In addition, each new executive officer is expected to establish an initial ownership position within one year of his or her appointment as an executive officer.
In the event a trustee or executive officer does not attain the target by the applicable date, he or she shall retain common shares or common share equivalents equal in value to 50% of the net after-tax shares or units received upon any stock option exercise, upon the vesting of any RSUs, or upon conversion of any vested LTIP units (LTIP Units) of the Company’s operating partnership, Public Storage OP, L.P. (the Operating Partnership) into common units (OP Units) of the Operating Partnership until the applicable ownership target is achieved. Once a trustee or executive officer comes into compliance with the stock ownership guidelines, he or she will not be considered to fall out of compliance solely due to a drop in the price of the Company’s common shares, provided that in such event the trustee or executive officer must retain common shares or common share equivalents equal in value to 50% of the net after-tax shares or units received upon any stock option exercise, upon the vesting of any RSUs, or upon conversion of any vested LTIP Units into OP Units until compliance is reestablished and any subsequent sale or redemption does not cause his or her ownership level to fall below the applicable ownership guideline at that time.
32 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance
Only the following are counted for determining compliance with these guidelines:
The values of unvested RSUs, unearned LTIP Units subject to performance conditions, appreciation-only LTIP Units (AO LTIP Units) (prior to conversion to LTIP Units) of the Operating Partnership, and unexercised stock options are not counted for determining compliance with these guidelines.
The following table shows the share ownership of our executive officers under the share ownership guidelines as of March 5, 2024:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| Qualifying Securities(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Executive |
| Ownership Requirement |
|
| Directly-Owned Shares |
|
| Directly-Owned LTIP Units |
|
| Value of Securities(2) |
|
| Excess/ (Shortfall) to Guideline |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
| $ | 6,000,000 |
|
|
| 19,096 |
|
|
| 23,725 |
|
| $ | 11,968,898 |
|
| $ | 5,968,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Tom Boyle |
| $ | 2,600,000 |
|
|
| 10,227 |
|
|
| 15,475 |
|
| $ | 7,183,966 |
|
| $ | 4,583,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Natalia N. Johnson |
| $ | 2,260,000 |
|
|
| 8,110 |
|
|
| 11,310 |
|
| $ | 5,428,084 |
|
| $ | 3,168,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
| $ | 1,700,000 |
|
|
| 3,614 |
|
|
| 9,000 |
|
| $ | 3,525,739 |
|
| $ | 1,825,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of the date of this proxy statement, all of our non-management trustees who have served for five years or more have met his/her stock ownership requirement. Refer to “Share Ownership of Trustees and Management” on page 74 of this proxy statement for additional information on the beneficial ownership of common shares by trustees and management.
The NGS Committee administers these stock ownership guidelines and may modify their terms and grant hardship exceptions in its discretion.
COMPENSATION OF TRUSTEES
Trustees who are not also Public Storage employees (non-management(non-management trustees) receive compensation for their service. The Board determines the form and amount of compensation for non-management trustees after consideration of the recommendation of the CHC Committee. The Board has approved the mix of cash and equity compensation described below.
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 33
Corporate Governance
Cash Retainers. Retainers are paid quarterly in cash and are prorated when a trustee joins the Board (or in the case of the Lead Independent Trustee, when an appointment is made) other than at the beginning of a calendar year.
Below are the annual retainers that non-management trustees were entitled to receive during 20222023 for Board service:
|
|
|
|
| |
Compensation |
| Amount |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Board member |
| $ | 120,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Lead Independent Trustee supplemental retainer |
| $ | 20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Audit Committee Chair supplemental retainer |
| $ | 10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Other standing Committee Chair supplemental retainer |
| $ | 5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Committee Member |
| $ | 7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In late 2023, the CHC Committee undertook a review of the Company’s non-management trustee compensation program, including as compared to the Company’s compensation benchmarking peer group. As a result of this review, the CHC Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the following annual cash retainers for non-management trustees for 2024 Board service:
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 37
|
|
|
|
| |
Compensation |
| Amount |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Board member |
| $ | 120,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Lead Independent Trustee and Committee Chair supplemental retainer |
| $ | 25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Committee Member |
| $ | 12,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate GovernanceThe CHC Committee and Board believe these updated cash retainers are appropriate and in line with market practice.
Trustee Deferral Program.Pursuant to the Non-Management Trustee Compensation and Deferral Program (the Trustee Deferral Program), non-management trustees may elect to receive all or a portion of their cash retainers either in cash, in shares of unrestricted Common Stock under the 2021 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2021 Plan),common shares, or in fully-vestedfully vested deferred stockshare units (DSUs) under the 2021 Plan.. Non-management trustees receive dividends declared and paid on unrestricted common shares and a cash dividend equivalent on DSUs. Beginning with DSUs granted in 2024, trustees also may elect to reinvest cash dividend equivalents paid on DSUs into additional DSUs.
Non-management trustees must make the electionelections in writing in advance of the calendar year to which the election relates (or, when a non-management trustee joins the Board, within 30 days of joining the Board). If chosen, the shares of unrestricted stockcommon shares and/or the DSUs will be granted to the non-management trustee at the end of each calendar quarter based on the cash retainer earned for that quarter and converted into a number of shares or units based on the closing price for the Common Stockcommon shares on the NYSE on such date. If a non-management trustee chooses to receive fully-vested DSUs, the trustee’s election must also indicate (1) when the units will be settled, such as the trustee’s separation from service (including retirement), a specified future date, or January 1 of the year following a chosen anniversary of the grant date, and (2) whether the units will be settled in a lump sum or in annual installments (not to exceed 10 years). , and (3) whether cash dividend equivalents will be reinvested into additional DSUs.
34 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance
Notwithstanding a trustee’s election, the DSUs will be settled in a lump sum upon the trustee’s earlier death or disability or upon an earlier change of control of Public Storage. In any event, the DSUs will be settled in shares of Common Stock.common shares.
Equity Awards
• 2023 Awards. For 2023, the Company followed its historical practice of granting each non-management trustee a non-qualified stock option to acquire 5,000 common shares. The stock options were granted immediately following the 2023 annual meeting of shareholders, with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the NYSE on that date. They vest in three equal annual installments based on continued service. • Program Updates for 2024. As described above, in late 2023, the CHC Committee undertook a review of the Company’s non-management trustee compensation program. With respect to the equity component of the program, the CHC Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, that beginning with the 2024 annual equity awards, non-management trustees would be granted a stock option to acquire a number of common shares equal in value to $180,000 as determined based on a Black-Scholes valuation on the grant date. Stock options will continue to be granted immediately following the annual meeting of shareholders and have an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the NYSE on that date, and they will now vest in full on the first anniversary of the grant date. Additionally, non-management trustees may elect to receive their annual equity award in the form of AO LTIP Units with equivalent terms.
|
|
Upon the retirement of a non-management trustee, the vesting of any equity awards granted to the trustee for his/her service on the Board and not otherwise deferred will accelerate effective on his/her retirement date from the Board. Additional terms and conditions may be set forth in the award agreement governing the non-management trustee’s equity awards. Unless otherwise defined in an award agreement, retirement is defined as a retirement from the Board pursuant to any mandatory retirement policy or at a time when the non-management trustee (x) is at least age 55, (y) has provided Services (as defined in the Public Storage 2021 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan (the 2021 Plan)) for a minimum of 10 years to the Company or its subsidiaries or affiliates (or previously provided Services to PS Business Parks or its subsidiaries or affiliates), and (z) the sum of his or her age and years of Service is at least 80.
In addition, upon the retirement of a non-management trustee, the trustee may exercise his/her vested options during the one-year period following his/her retirement date from the Board or, if shorter, the period from his/her retirement date from the Board until the expiration of the original term of the options. If not exercised within such period, the vested options will automatically terminate at the end of such period.
Following the retirement of a non-management trustee, any DSUs received under the Trustee Deferral Program will be delivered as elected in the trustee’s election form.
38 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Corporate Governance
Unvested equity awards (RSUs and options) held by current non-management trustees who are former Public Storage executives will continue to vest under the terms of the Company’s equity incentive plans for so long as the trustee continues to provide service to the Company. Those awards will not qualify for accelerated vesting as described above upon the retirement of the non-management trustee.non-management trustee.
TRUSTEE AND EXECUTIVE OFFICER STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
Pursuant to the Board’s stock ownership guidelines, we expect each trustee to beneficially own Common Stock equal in market value to three times the amount of the annual cash retainer for Board member service. Each non-management trustee shall attain his or her ownership within five years from the date of election or appointment.
In 2022, we increased the stock ownership guidelines applicable to our executive officers. Our CEO is expected to beneficially own Common Stock equal in value to six times his or her base salary (increased from five times), and our other executive officers are expected to beneficially own Common Stock equal in value to four times their base salary (increased from three times), in each case within five years of appointment or promotion. In addition, each new executive officer is expected to establish an initial Common Stock ownership position within one year of his or her appointment as an executive officer.
In the event a trustee or executive officer does not attain the target by the applicable date or maintain the target after such date, he or she shall retain shares of the Common Stock equal in value to 50% of the net after-tax shares received upon any stock option exercise or upon the vesting of any RSUs until the applicable ownership target is achieved.
Only shares of Common Stock owned by the non-management trustee or executive officer, vested DSUs held by the non-management trustee, shares of Common Stock owned jointly by him/her and his/her spouse, and shares owned by his/her spouse or beneficially for his/her children or in the PS 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan (the 401(k) Plan) are counted for determining compliance with these guidelines. We do not count unvested time-based RSUs or unvested or unexercised stock options when determining compliance with these guidelines. Refer to “Share Ownership of Trustees and Management” on page 80 of this proxy statement for information on beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock by trustees and management.
The NGS Committee administers these stock ownership guidelines and may modify their terms and grant hardship exceptions in its discretion. As of the date of this proxy statement, all of our non-management trustees who have served for five years or more exceeded his/her stock ownership requirement. Each non-management trustee who has served for less than five years and each of our executive officers is currently on track to attain his or her applicable ownership guideline by the end of the applicable accumulation period.
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 3935
Corporate Governance
20222023 TRUSTEE COMPENSATION
The following table presents the compensation provided by the Company to our trustees for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
Trustee | Fees earned or paid in cash | Option Awards(1)(2) | Total | |||||||||
Ronald L. Havner, Jr. | $ | 120,000 | (3) | $ | 427,417 | $ | 547,417 | |||||
Tamara Hughes Gustavson | $ | 120,000 | $ | 427,417 | $ | 547,417 | ||||||
Leslie S. Heisz | $ | 135,000 | $ | 427,417 | $ | 562,417 | ||||||
Michelle Millstone-Shroff | $ | 135,000 | $ | 427,417 | $ | 562,417 | ||||||
Shankh S. Mitra | $ | 135,000 | (3) | $ | 427,417 | $ | 562,417 | |||||
David J. Neithercut | $ | 155,000 | (3) | $ | 427,417 | $ | 582,417 | |||||
Rebecca Owen | $ | 135,000 | (3) | $ | 427,417 | $ | 562,417 | |||||
Kristy M. Pipes | $ | 145,000 | $ | 427,417 | $ | 572,417 | ||||||
Avedick B. Poladian | $ | 140,000 | $ | 427,417 | $ | 567,417 | ||||||
John Reyes | $ | 120,000 | (3) | $ | 427,417 | $ | 547,417 | |||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr.(4) | — | — | — | |||||||||
Tariq M. Shaukat | $ | 127,500 | $ | 427,417 | $ | 554,917 | ||||||
Ronald P. Spogli | $ | 140,000 | (3) | $ | 427,417 | $ | 567,417 | |||||
Paul S. Williams | $ | 135,000 | (3) | $ | 427,417 | $ | 562,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Trustee |
| Fees earned or |
| Option |
| Total |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Ronald L. Havner, Jr. |
|
| $ | 120,000 |
| (3) |
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 364,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Tamara Hughes Gustavson |
|
| $ | 120,000 |
|
|
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 364,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Leslie S. Heisz |
|
| $ | 127,500 |
|
|
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 371,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Michelle Millstone-Shroff(4) |
|
| $ | 31,875 |
|
|
|
| $ | — |
|
|
|
| $ | 31,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Shankh S. Mitra |
|
| $ | 127,500 |
| (3) |
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 371,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
David J. Neithercut |
|
| $ | 147,500 |
| (3) |
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 391,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Rebecca Owen |
|
| $ | 127,500 |
| (3) |
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 371,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Kristy M. Pipes |
|
| $ | 145,000 |
|
|
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 389,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Avedick B. Poladian |
|
| $ | 140,000 |
|
|
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 384,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
John Reyes |
|
| $ | 120,000 |
| (3) |
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 364,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr.(5) |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Tariq M. Shaukat |
|
| $ | 127,500 |
|
|
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 371,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Ronald P. Spogli |
|
| $ | 140,000 |
| (3) |
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 384,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Paul S. Williams |
|
| $ | 135,000 |
| (3) |
|
| $ | 244,080 |
|
|
|
| $ | 379,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
36 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2:
Advisory Vote to Approve
Executive Compensation
Approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs as discussed and disclosed in the CD&A, the compensation tables, and any related material contained in this proxy statement. | ||||||
RECOMMENDATION: Vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s NEOs |
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 4137
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), we provide our shareholders the opportunity to vote on the compensation program for our NEOs through a nonbinding annual advisory vote (Say-on-Pay(Say-on-Pay proposal). Although the vote on the Say-on-Pay proposal is advisory and nonbinding, the Compensation and Human CapitalCHC Committee values the opinions of our shareholders and will continue to consider the outcome of the vote and other sources of shareholder feedback when making future compensation decisions.
In 2022,2023, we achieved record Company performance, including record revenues of $4.2$4.5 billion, NOI of $3.1$3.4 billion, and Core FFO per share of $15.92.$16.89. We successfully executed against the corporateour organic and external growth strategy, detailed at our 2021 Investor Day, accelerating our portfolio growth through acquisitions, including the acquisition of Simply Self Storage, development, redevelopment, and our third-party management platform; achieving organic growth powered by innovation; and deploying our growth-oriented balance sheet while expanding career opportunities for our front-line teammatesemployees and increasing employee engagement. Our strategy including a focus on the health and safety of our customers and employees, has further positioned the Company for sustainable long-term growth and value creation.
We believe our compensation program for NEOs helped Public Storage deliver strong performance in 2022,2023, despite the market volatility and economic uncertainty experienced through the year.
We are askingask our shareholders to indicate their support for the compensation of our NEOs as disclosed in this proxy statement by voting “FOR”the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Public Storage approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to Public Storage’s Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement for the Annual Meeting pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and the narrative discussion that accompanies the compensation tables.”
VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is necessary for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our NEOs. For purposes of the vote on this proposal, abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the vote.
The Board recommends a vote FOR approval
of our executive compensation
as described in this proxy statement.
4238 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following executive officers were NEOs in 2022:2023:
|
|
|
|
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 4339
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)
This CD&A provides a detailed description of our executive compensation philosophy and program and the factors we believe shareholders should consider in evaluating our Say-on-Pay proposal.Say-on-Pay proposal.
OVERVIEW OF COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND PRACTICES
Record Performance While Further Positioning the Company for Sustainable Growth
We achieved record Company performance in 2022,2023, including record revenues, record NOI, and record Core FFO per share, and we successfully executed against the corporate strategy detailed at our 2021 Investor Day. The Company focusedshare. We continued to execute on our peopleopportunistic growth strategy, deepening our presence in fast-growing markets, including through our acquisition of Simply Self Storage. We also continued to enhance the customer experience, becoming the first public self storage REIT to achieve 100% of properties with digital property access and customers, innovation-powered organic growth, multi-factor external growth,maintaining the utilization ofindustry’s first end-to-end digital ecosystem. Throughout the year, we remained disciplined, leveraging our growth-oriented balance sheet and focusing on sustainable long-term growth and value creation.
Highlights from our record performance include:
|
40 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
The Company strengthened its leadership position among the self-storage REITs through continued income generation and margin out-performance, reflecting our tangible competitive advantages and unique operating model transformation. Below are various 20222023 performance highlights for Public Storage as compared to the self-storage REITs (Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR), CubeSmart (NYSE: CUBE), Life Storage, Inc. (NYSE: LSI), and National Storage Affiliates (NYSE: NSA)):
|
* Same-store metrics per Company disclosures.
We also continued our leadership position with respect to external growth during 2022, expandingenhance our portfolio by 5.9 million square feet at a cost of $958 million through the acquisition,strategic acquisitions, development, and redevelopment of self-storage properties. In 2023, we added 13.9 million square feet to our portfolio at a cost of $2.8 billion, including our acquisition of Simply Self Storage, which was our largest private acquisition to date. Since 2019, we have added significantly more square footage togrown our portfolio than any of our REIT peers, creating significant growth and value when combined with our operating performance.
by 35%, adding 56.0 million square feet.
|
|
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 45
Organic Growth Powered by Innovation
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
| |||
• Achieved • 93.3% average occupancy • $22.93 average rents per occupied square foot (record) • 4.7% revenue growth • 4.1% direct NOI growth • 79.7% direct NOI margin • Enhanced over • Online, contactless • Rent-by-phone accounted for nearly 20% of call center move-ins • Maintained the largest self-service kiosk platform in the industry, adding 126 additional kiosks in 2023, with more than 320 kiosks in place at year end • Our Public Storage App, which provides customers with convenient phone-based digital gate access, bill payment, and account management capabilities, has been downloaded over •
Achieved average of 4.7 out of 5.0 stars from customers in Google Reviews • Replaced publicstorage.com with a new, state of the art website • Realized tenant insurance revenue of more than $200 million |
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 41
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
| |||
Multi-Factor Acceleration of Portfolio Growth | |||
| |||
• Acquired $2.7 billion, including through our $2.2 billion acquisition of Simply Self Storage • Delivered • Maintained a development pipeline comprising • Added |
| Our Growth-Oriented Balance Sheet | ||
| |||
• Issued $2.2 billion of senior notes in
the Simply Self Storage acquisition • Maintained a growth-oriented balance sheet—one of the strongest in the REIT industry—at • Only U.S. REIT to |
46 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
| Our People | ||
| |||
• Maintained a diverse workforce comprising approximately •
Recognized as a Great Place to Work® for a second consecutive year • Graduated our first class of
• Continued our employee-driven Community Connects™ charitable giving program |
Our strategic and operational strengths resulted in the following total shareholder returns over the one-year and three-year periods:
42 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 47
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Our Compensation Philosophy and Practices Align Executive Pay with Performance and Long-Term Value-Creation
The Board and the CHC Committee believe that it is critical to Public Storage’s long-term success to:
•
•
|
•
The following key features of our compensation program reflect our philosophy:
|
| ||||||
What We Do | What We Don’t Do | ||||||
☑ | Substantial portion of our NEOs’ compensation is “at risk”
| ☒ | No employment, “golden parachute,” or severance agreements with our NEOs | ||||
☑ | High percentage of executive compensation in equity | ☒ | No guaranteed bonus or salary increase arrangements with our NEOs except for new hires | ||||
☑ | Long equity vesting periods promote retention and align pay with long-term value creation | ☒ | No excessive perquisites | ||||
☑ | Robust stock ownership guidelines and strong clawback provisions | ☒ | No repricing of stock options | ||||
☑ | 100% of long-term equity compensation subject to multi-year relative performance | ☒ | No tax gross ups | ||||
☑ | Double-trigger for accelerated vesting of equity upon a change in control | ☒ | No supplemental retirement plans | ||||
☒ | No hedging against price fluctuations in the Company’s securities |
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 43
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Our Compensation Process is Disciplined, Balanced, and Responsive to Our Shareholders
The CHC Committee determines our compensation philosophy and makes all final compensation decisions for our CEO and other NEOs. It has the authority to select, retain, and terminate advisors and other experts (including independent compensation consultants) as it deems appropriate, and in 20222023 it retained Ferguson Partners Consulting (Ferguson) to assist with the design of our compensation program.
48 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Our annual compensation process for NEOs includes the following features:
1 | The Board annually reviews the Company’s strategy and business plans | |
2 | The Board and the CHC Committee discuss and establish Company and individual performance goals consistent with the Company’s strategy and business plans | |
3 | The CHC Committee periodically reviews Company and NEO performance, consulting with the Board and our CEO as appropriate (and as detailed below) | |
4 | At year end, the CHC Committee solicits the views of the Board on the performance of all our NEOs. In addition, our CEO shares his assessment of the other NEOs’ performance against their goals and his recommendation on compensation for the CHC Committee’s consideration |
The factors the CHC Committee considers in making all final compensation decisions for our NEOs include:
Company Performance, Strategic Execution, and Individual Performance.The CHC Committee considers the Company’s annual and long-term financial performance in light of operating conditions; management’s execution against the Company’s strategic plan and their goals, with a focus on management’s contributions to long-term value creation; and established priorities and goals.
Board and CEO Views.The CHC Committee solicits the views of the Board on performance of all NEOs, particularly for Mr. Russell.
The CHC Committee also solicits Mr. Russell’s views on (1) compensation of the other NEOs and (2) Company-wide compensation matters. The CHC Committee, at its discretion, may also solicit the views of other members of the management team, including our Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Russell does not vote on items before the CHC Committee and is not present during the CHC Committee’s discussion and determination of his compensation. The CHC Committee sets the CEO’s base salary, bonus, and equity compensation using its independent judgment and analysis.
Appropriate Pay Mix and Use of Deferred Compensation Subject to Lengthy Vesting Periods. The CHC Committee considers what mix of cash and equity compensation attracts and retains exceptional talent and properly incentivizes management to focus on the creation of long-term value without excessive risk-taking. In this regard, the CHC Committee believes that
44 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
emphasizing the use of equity compensation (primarily in the form of performance-based RSUs and performance-based stock options) with long vesting periods—longer than anyperiods (typically five years from the grant date in order to realize the full value of our peer companies—an earned award) is a highly effective way of incentivizing our executives to remain with the Company and focus on long-term value creation. Through the use of long vesting periods, we link our NEOs’ realized compensation to our long-term stock performance.
Shareholder Engagement and Feedback.We believe in maintaining an ongoing dialogue with our shareholders and seek their feedback on a wide range of issues, including our compensation practices. Our 2022Since 2020, we have enhanced our compensation program reflects enhancements that we made in responsepractices to shareholderincrease the transparency of our disclosures and further link pay to performance, including relative and long-term performance.
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 49
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
feedback, including shifting our granted equity awards to be 100% based on multi-year relative performance (measured against both our self-storage REIT competitors and the S&P 500 REITs).
Every year we provide our shareholders the opportunity to vote on an advisory basis on our NEO compensation, and we consider this to be one measure of shareholder support for our compensation program. Our Say-on-Pay proposal received nearly 94%over 98% support in 2022,2023, which we believe reflects shareholder support for ongoing improvements we have made to our executive compensation programs over the last several years.
The CHC Committee is committed to continuing to strengthen the alignment of our executive compensation programs with the Company’s strategy and focus on long-term value creation.
Compensation Surveys and Other Market Data.Each component of compensation we pay to our NEOs—salary, annual cash incentive, and equity—is based on the CHC Committee’s assessment of each individual’s job scope and responsibilities and consideration of market compensation. In balancing these and other considerations, including the feedback of our shareholders, the CHC Committee uses comparison data from various companies to guide in its review and determination of the various components of our executive compensation plans, including total target compensation and the appropriate mix of cash and equity compensation. The CHC Committee uses market compensation information to:
•
•
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 45
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Market data is part of the diverse toolkit the CHC Committee uses to set fair and competitive compensation levels that help drive the creation of long-term value while mitigating undue risk-taking and attracting and retaining top talent.
50 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
The CHC Committee has the sole authority to engage and terminate any compensation consultant to assist in the evaluation of trustee or executive compensation, and has the sole authority to approve the fees (up to $50,000) and other terms of retention of such compensation consultants.
In 2022,2023, the CHC Committee engaged Ferguson as its independent compensation consultant to assist with its review of compensation for the senior management team. Ferguson advised the CHC Committee on a variety of subjects, including peer group benchmarking, compensation plan design and trends, pay-for-performance analytics, and other compensation topics. While Ferguson provided data and analyses and made recommendations for the compensation program, the CHC Committee made all decisions regarding the compensation of the NEOs.
The CHC Committee annually reviews the composition of our peer group to ensure that each company’s relevant attributes remain comparable to ours. We are one of the largest REITs, ranking seventh among U.S. REITs based on total capitalization and fifthfourth based on equity market capitalization as of December 31, 2022.2023. The CHC Committee believes it is appropriate to focus on companies within the real estate sector, including REITs, as well as other respected companies from other industries with similarly large market capitalization and asset, operational, and employee footprints. These are representative companies that face many of the same strategic and operational considerations we do and against which we compete for executive talent:
Rationale for Inclusion | Companies Included | ||
S&P 500 Self-Storage REITs | Extra Space | ||
Non-S&P 500 Self-Storage REITs | CubeSmart, Life | ||
Storage* | |||
S&P 500 Equity REITs with at least 1,000 employees | American Tower, AvalonBay, Crown Castle, Digital Realty, Equinix, Equity Residential, | ||
Other S&P 500 Equity REITs | Boston Properties, Realty Income, Ventas, Welltower | ||
Non-REITs with relevant asset, operational, and employee footprints | Domino’s Pizza, Yum Brands |
* Life Storage was included as a peer group company at the time the 2023 compensation program was designed and approved. Subsequently, in July 2023, Life Storage was acquired by Extra Space.
46 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 51
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
For 2022,2023, our peer group comprised the following companies:
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
Company | Industry | Total Capitalization ($MM) |
| Industry |
| Total | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Prologis, Inc. (NYSE: PLD) | Industrial | $ | 134,615 |
| Industrial |
| $ | 159,361 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
American Tower Corporation (NYSE: AMT) |
| Communications |
| $ | 154,486 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Equinix, Inc. (Nasdaq: EQIX) |
| Data Center |
| $ | 93,572 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc. (NYSE: SPG) |
| Regional Mall |
| $ | 80,242 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Crown Castle Inc. (NYSE: CCI) | Communications | $ | 86,692 |
| Communications |
| $ | 78,806 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Equinix, Inc. (Nasdaq: EQIX) | Data Center | $ | 77,139 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Simon Property Group, Inc. (NYSE: SPG) | Regional Mall | $ | 69,703 | |||||||||||||
Welltower Inc. (NYSE: WELL) |
| Health Care |
| $ | 67,871 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Public Storage (NYSE: PSA) |
| Self-Storage |
| $ | 67,276 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Realty Income Corporation (NYSE: O) | Single Tenant Retail | $ | 60,611 |
| Single Tenant Retail |
| $ | 65,350 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Public Storage (NYSE: PSA) | Self-Storage | $ | 60,562 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (NYSE: DLR) | Data Center | $ | 48,752 |
| Data Center |
| $ | 62,573 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Yum! Brands, Inc. (NYSE: YUM)* | Restaurants | $ | 48,664 |
| Restaurants |
| $ | 48,215 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Welltower Inc. (NYSE: WELL) | Health Care | $ | 47,961 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
SBA Communications Corporation (NYSE: NMS) | Communications | $ | 45,476 | |||||||||||||
Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR) |
| Self-Storage |
| $ | 46,927 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
| 1 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
SBA Communications Corporation (Nasdaq: SBAC) |
| Communications |
| $ | 41,910 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (NYSE: AVB) | Multifamily | $ | 31,079 |
| Multifamily |
| $ | 34,725 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Equity Residential (NYSE: EQR) | Multifamily | $ | 30,832 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Ventas, Inc. (NYSE: VTR) | Health Care | $ | 30,821 |
| Health Care |
| $ | 34,084 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Extra Space Storage Inc. (NYSE: EXR) | Self-Storage | $ | 29,152 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Equity Residential (NYSE: EQR) |
| Multifamily |
| $ | 31,646 |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Boston Properties, Inc. (NYSE: BXP) | Office | $ | 28,073 |
| Office |
| $ | 30,590 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Weyerhaeuser Company (NYSE: WY) | Timber | $ | 27,888 |
| Timber |
| $ | 30,565 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Essex Property Trust, Inc. (NYSE: ESS) | Multifamily | $ | 20,348 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Domino’s Pizza, Inc. (NYSE: DPZ)* | Restaurants | $ | 17,815 |
| Restaurants |
| $ | 19,508 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Vornado Realty Trust (NYSE: VNO) | Office | $ | 14,995 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
CubeSmart (NYSE: CUBE) | Self-Storage | $ | 12,222 |
| Self-Storage |
| $ | 13,546 |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||
Life Storage, Inc. (NYSE: LSI) | Self-Storage | $ | 11,971 |
Source: S&P Capital IQ, year to date as of December 31, 2022.2023. Domino’s Pizza, Inc. and Yum! Brands, Inc. reflect Total Enterprise Value as of December 31, 2022.2023.
* Denotes peers outside of the real estate sector with relevant asset, operational, and employee footprints.
|
The CHC Committee evaluates our peer group annually and may make adjustments or refinements to this peer group based on new or changed circumstances, including the relevant size or operations of our peers relative to ours. Following adjustments to the peer group made inIn 2021 forand 2022, the CHC determined to leave the composition of the peer group remained the same. In January 2023, the CHC Committee worked with Ferguson to update the peer set in preparation for setting 2023 compensation.
Our peer group previously included Essex Property Trust, Inc. and Vornado Realty Trust, which were removed in January 2023 in favor of the addition of American Tower Corporation. These changes in peer group composition are reflected in the graphic and peer group table above. Additionally, Life Storage, Inc., which was included as a peer group company at the time the52 |
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 47
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
2023 compensation program was designed and approved, was acquired by Extra Space Storage Inc. in July 2023, at which time it ceased to be a member of the peer group.
OUR 20222023 NEO COMPENSATION PROGRAM
The CHC Committee designed the 20222023 compensation program to be consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy. Given the strong support expressed by shareholders for the 2020 and 20212022 compensation programs,program, the CHC Committee largely retained the design of these programs with certain further enhancements.this program. The following are the key components of the Company’s 20222023 compensation program. The CHC Committee’s ultimate 20222023 performance awards are described in the section that follows.
Incentivizing and Rewarding Performance through Through At-Risk Pay
Our executive compensation design is simple, effective, and links pay to performance and the creation of long-term value. We pay our NEOs a mix of cash and equity, the substantial majority of which is “at risk” and tied to achieving performance objectives set by the CHC Committee in light of the Company’s long-term strategy and the current business environment. We promote responsible growth and risk management and align the interests of our executives with the interests of our shareholders by using performance-based equity awards that are subject to long, above-market vesting periods as the predominant form of compensation. The main elements of our 2023 executive compensation program are summarized as follows:
| ||||||
Compensation Type |
| Pay Element | Primary Objectives | |||
Fixed Pay | Cash Compensation | Base Salary | • The only fixed element of compensation, provides stable income and compensation for day-to-day responsibilities
Helps attract and retain exceptional talent | |||
At-Risk Pay | Annual Performance-Based Cash Incentive | • Aligns compensation with business strategy • Motivates and rewards achievement of predefined annual financial and strategic goals | ||||
Equity Compensation | Multi-Year Performance-Based RSUs Multi-Year Performance-Based Stock Options | • Drive sustainable performance through achievement of predetermined financial and other goals • Align the interest of executives with those of shareholders • Help retain executive talent through extended vesting schedule (5 years) |
48 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 53
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
2022 2023 At-Risk Compensation of Our NEOs
We believe that paying a significantly larger percentage of total compensation to our NEOs in performance-based cash and equity incentive awards advances our pay-for-performance compensation philosophy. The following charts depict for Mr. Russell, our CEO, and for all of our NEOs together, the split between (i) compensation tied to the achievement of performance goals, consisting of performance-based options, performance-based RSUs, and annual cash incentive awards, and (ii) compensation not tied to performance goals, consisting of base salary. The amounts below include performance-based options, performance-based RSUs, and annual cash incentive awards that would have been paid assuming target achievement for 2022.2023.
2023 CEO Compensation | 2023 NEO Compensation | |
|
| |
| ||
|
CASH COMPENSATION
Base Salaries.Consistent with the CHC Committee’s philosophy that executive compensation should be more heavily weighted towards performance-based, at-risk compensation, the CHC Committee set the following base salaries for our NEOs, which comprise a small percentage of each NEO’s potential compensation when compared to performance-based, at-risk compensation:
|
|
| |||||||||
Executive | 2022 Base Salary |
| 2023 Base Salary(1) | ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | $ | 800,000 |
|
| $ | 1,000,000 |
|
| |||
H. Thomas Boyle | $ | 550,000 |
|
| $ | 600,000 |
|
| |||
Natalia N. Johnson | $ | 500,000 |
|
| $ | 530,000 |
|
| |||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | $ | 425,000 |
|
| $ | 425,000 |
|
| |||
David Lee(2) |
|
| $ | 425,000 |
|
|
These salaries are unchanged
(1) Reflects annualized salary. Mr. Russell’s salary was increased from 2021$800,000 to $1,000,000 effective July 1, 2023, Mr. Boyle’s salary was increased from $550,000 to $600,000, and reflectMs. Johnson’s salary was increased from $500,000 to $530,000, in each case to better align with peer practice, based in part on a market analysis prepared by the CHC Committee’s determinations as informed by, among other things, peer and market practice.
independent compensation consultant.
(2)54 | Mr. Lee resigned from the Company effective August 1, 2023.
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 49
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
20222023 Annual Cash Incentive Program.Similar to prior years, the CHC Committee structured the 20222023 annual cash incentive program to be based both on a financial performance metric and the Company’s achievement of strategic management goals. For the Company financial performance metric, the CHC Committee chose growth in Core FFO, goals instead of NOI goals, as used in previous years, to better align with overall Company financial performance.2022. The CHC Committee weighted the Core FFO growth metric and the achievement of predefined strategic management goals metric equally at 50%.
The CHC Committee selected growth in Core FFO as the Company performance metric because Core FFO, a widely-accepted measure of a REIT’s earnings, is a strong indicator of management’s operational effectiveness and a foundational metric for measuring the Company’s execution of its long-term strategy.
Core FFO for these purposes was defined as the Company’s funds from operations excluding the impact of (i) foreign currency exchange gains and losses, (ii) charges related to the redemption of preferred securities, and (iii) certain other non-cash and/or nonrecurring income or expense items primarily representing the impact of loss contingency accruals and casualties, unrealized gain on private equity investments and our equity share of merger transaction costs, severance of a senior executive, and lease termination income from our equity investees.
The CHC Committee approved the following 20222023 performance targets and award levels:
Core FFO Growth Achieved | Award | |
< | 0% | |
| 50% | |
| 75% | |
| 100% | |
| 125% | |
> | 150% |
In setting the Core FFO growth targets for 2022,2023, the CHC Committee considered a number of factors, including the Company’s 20222023 strategy and financial forecasts, including expectations for the general economic and interest rate environments throughout the year, and existing competitive conditions. Based on these factors, the CHC Committee determined that a threshold of 17%2% and a target level of 21%4% to 23%6% growth would be appropriately challenging for the Company to achieve and would result in the delivery of substantial shareholder value.
50 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 55
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
In addition to Core FFO growth, the CHC Committee continued to utilize a strategic management goals component to the annual cash incentive program, amounting to 50% of each targeted award. The CHC Committee assigned each executive a series of specific goals—including goals tied to specific business performance metrics and key results—customized to his or her responsible functional area and linked to the Company’s strategic objectives for 2023. The CHC Committee believes this component emphasizes the importance of the contributions of the executive team as a group to the successful execution of the Company’s strategic plan.
The Company goalsCompany’s strategic objectives for 2023 included the 2022 annual cash incentive program were to:following:
|
2023 Strategic Objectives* |
• Deliver strong shareholder results • Increase capital allocation through development, growing the Public Storage® brand, and energy efficiency • Achieve strong employee engagement and succession planning for critical roles in the Company and reduce employee turnover • Enhance the customer experience and optimize the Company’s operating model • Optimize expenses to deliver strong NOI • Continue the digital transformation of the Company’s business
operations and enhance data science modeling • Expand the Company’s “industry as a customer” initiatives, including through the acceleration of the Company’s insurance offerings and third party management business • Enhance the Company’s enterprise risk management program and • Continue climate readiness activities and improve the |
* Each strategic objective includes goals tied to specific business performance metrics and key results.
The following table sets forth the target 20222023 cash incentive awards for each of our NEOs:
Executive | 2022 Target Cash Incentive Award | ||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | $ | 1,200,000 | |||
H. Thomas Boyle | $ | 825,000 | |||
Natalia N. Johnson | $ | 500,000 | |||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | $ | 425,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Executive |
| 2023 Target | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
|
| $ | 2,000,000 |
|
|
H. Thomas Boyle |
|
| $ | 900,000 |
|
|
Natalia N. Johnson |
|
| $ | 700,000 |
|
|
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
|
| $ | 425,000 |
|
|
David Lee(2) |
|
| $ | 425,000 |
|
|
56 |
(1) The 2023 target payment amount for Mr. Russell was increased from 150% of base salary to 200% of base salary to better align with peer practice, based in part on a market analysis prepared by the CHC Committee’s independent compensation consultant.
(2) Mr. Lee resigned from the Company effective August 1, 2023.
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 51
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
PERFORMANCE-BASED EQUITY COMPENSATION
In February 2022,2023, the CHC Committee approved the 20222023 equity award program for NEOs. The key elements of our 20222023 equity compensation program were as follows.
100% MULTI-YEAR PERFORMANCE-CONTINGENT EQUITY +
PERFORMANCE BASED ENTIRELY ON RELATIVE TSR PERFORMANCE +
SHAREHOLDER ALIGNMENT WITH LONGER-TERM VESTING | |||||||||||
Multi-Year Approach | Balance Between | Payouts Based Entirely on Relative | Emphasis on | Long-Term Vesting | |||||||
• Entirety of NEO equity compensation is contingent on a three-year | • 60% of each NEO’s target equity award was in the form of performance-based RSUs • 40% of each NEO’s target equity award was in the form of performance-based options | • For both the performance-based RSUs and the performance-based options, the Company’s TSR performance over the performance period will be measured relative to the performance of the self-storage peers and the S&P 500 Equity REITs | • 60% of each award is based on the Company’s TSR performance relative to the self-storage peers • 40% of each award is based on the Company’s TSR performance relative to the S&P 500 Equity REITs | • Performance for all awards will be measured at the end of a three-year performance period, with 60% of earned awards vesting upon certification by the CHC Committee and the remaining 40% vesting in equal annual installments over the following two years |
Multi-Year Performance-Based Equity Awards.For 2022,2023, the CHC Committee granted each of our NEOs a combination of multi-year performance-based RSUs and multi-year performance-based options. All awards are subject to a three-year (2022-2024)(March 15, 2023 to March 14, 2026) performance period and are based entirely on the Company’s total shareholder return from share price appreciation and dividends (TSR) over the performance period relative to the TSR of the self-storage peers and of the S&P 500 REITs index.Equity REITs.
The 2022 equity program includes several enhancements as compared to the 2021 program: (1) all awards are subject to a three-year performance period, reflecting a transition from a one-year performance period for the RSU component, (2) all awards are based entirely on relative TSR performance, reflecting a transition from the use of a TSR modifier only for the 2021 performance-based options, and (3) a rebalancing of the relative TSR performance to have a greater focus on our performance measured against that of the direct self-storage REIT competitors while still preserving a portion of performance tied to other S&P 500 REITs in light of our significant size differential to our direct peers. The CHC Committee believes that these enhancements further align the interests of our NEOs with those of our shareholders by incentivizing our executives to create sustainable long-term value.
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 57
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
For each award (RSUs and options), the CHC Committee weighted the award 60% based on the Company’s TSR over the performance period as compared against the weighted average TSR of the Company’s direct self-storage peers (Extra(currently, Extra Space, CubeSmart, Life Storage, and National Storage) and 40% based on the Company’s TSR over the performance period as compared against the weighted average TSR of the Equity REITs in the S&P 500. Each award
52 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
is subject to a minimum performance threshold below which no award would ultimately be earned. The approved performance targets and award levels are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Three-Year Performance Period |
| Three-Year Performance Period | ||||
60% TSR vs. Self-Storage Peers (EXR, CUBE, NSA) |
| Award |
| 40% TSR vs. S&P 500 Equity REITs |
| Award |
<80% |
| 0% |
| <80% |
| 0% |
80% – <90% |
| 25% |
| 80% – <90% |
| 25% |
90% – <100% |
| 75% |
| 90% – <100% |
| 75% |
100% – <106% |
| 100% |
| 100% – <106% |
| 100% |
106% – <116% |
| 125% |
| 106% – <116% |
| 125% |
116% – 125% |
| 150% |
| 116% – 125% |
| 150% |
>125% |
| 200% |
| >125% |
| 200% |
Three-Year Performance Period | Three-Year Performance Period | |||||||
60% TSR vs. Self-Storage Peers (EXR, CUBE, LSI, NSA) | Award (as a Percentage of Target) | 40% TSR vs. S&P 500 REITs | Award of Target) | |||||
<80% | 0% | <80% | 0% | |||||
80% – <90% | 25% | 80% – <90% | 25% | |||||
90% – <100% | 75% | 90% – <100% | 75% | |||||
100% – <106% | 100% | 100% – <106% | 100% | |||||
106% – <116% | 125% | 106% – <116% | 125% | |||||
116% – 125% | 150% | 116% – 125% | 150% | |||||
>125% | 200% | >125% | 200% |
In setting these relative TSR performance levels, the CHC Committee considered the Company’s historical relative TSR performance as compared to both the self-storage peers and the S&P 500 Equity REITs. The CHC Committee determined that a threshold of 80% relative TSR performance and a target level of 100% to 106% would be appropriately challenging for the Company to achieve and would result in strong alignment between the interests of our NEOs and our shareholders’ recognition of value over the long term.
For each NEO, the CHC Committee established a target dollar value of performance-based equity awards. As between performance-based RSUs and performance-based options, the Compensation CHC Committee determined to grant 60% of each NEO’s award in RSUs and 40% in options. The following table sets forth the 20222023 target performance-based RSU and performance-based option awards granted to our NEOs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 2023 Target RSU Award |
| 2023 Target Option Award | ||||||||||||||
NEO |
| Target Value(1) |
| Target Number |
| Target Value(1) |
| Target Number | ||||||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
|
| $ | 3,035,520 |
|
|
| 10,520 |
|
| $ | 2,023,680 |
|
|
| 40,555 | ||
H. Thomas Boyle |
|
| $ |
| 2,550,000 |
|
|
| 8,837 |
|
| $ |
| 1,700,000 |
|
|
| 34,068 |
Natalia N. Johnson |
|
| $ |
| 1,900,000 |
|
|
| 6,584 |
|
| $ |
| 1,275,000 |
|
|
| 25,551 |
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
|
| $ |
| 972,000 |
|
|
| 3,368 |
|
| $ |
| 648,000 |
|
|
| 12,986 |
David Lee(2) |
|
| $ |
| 630,000 |
|
|
| 2,183 |
|
| $ |
| 200,000 |
|
|
| 4,008 |
2022 Target RSU Award (Five-Year Vesting Period) | 2022 Target Option Award (Five-Year Vesting Period) | |||||||||||||||||||
NEO | Target Value* | Target Number | Target Value* | Target Number | ||||||||||||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | $ | 3,035,520 | 8,551 | $ | 2,023,680 | 30,213 | ||||||||||||||
H. Thomas Boyle | $ | 2,177,610 | 6,134 | $ | 1,451,740 | 21,674 | ||||||||||||||
Natalia N. Johnson | $ | 1,451,700 | 4,089 | $ | 967,800 | 14,449 | ||||||||||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | $ | 1,140,000 | 3,211 | $ | 760,000 | 11,347 |
|
(1)58 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive The target values reflect the dollar value of awards the CHC Committee approved in February 2023. In accordance with this approval, the approved dollar value of performance-based RSUs was converted into a target number of RSUs using the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the grant date, and the approved dollar value of performance-based options was converted into a target number of options using a Black-Scholes model. The approved dollar values shown here differ from the grant date fair values reported in the Summary Compensation Table, which were calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using a Monte Carlo simulation that assesses the probability of satisfying the relative market performance hurdles over the remainder of the performance period and will fluctuate in value throughout the performance period depending upon the Company’s relative performance.
(2) Mr. Lee resigned from the Company effective August 1, 2023.
To further align this component of NEO compensation with long-term shareholder value creation, the CHC Committee again implemented an extended vesting period for any awards that are earned upon satisfaction of the performance metrics. Three-fifths of any multi-year performance-based RSU or option award will vest upon achievement of the performance targets at the conclusion of the three-year performance period, with the remaining vesting ratably over the next two years.
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 53
2022Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
2023 EARNED INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
The following is a summary of the incentive compensation earned by our NEOs for 2022.2023. The CHC Committee believes that these awards reasonably reward our NEOs for exemplary performance through a softening and volatile economic environment during the year, appropriately recognize management’s contributions to the successes the Company achieved in 2022,2023, and are consistent with the Company’s pay-for-performance compensation philosophy.
20222023 Annual Cash Incentives.As described above, the 20222023 annual cash incentive program was based 50% on achievement of Core FFO growth targets, and 50% on achievement of predetermined strategic management goals.
With respect to the Core FFO growth metric, in 20222023 the Company achieved year-over-year Core FFO growth of 23.1%.6.1%, modestly better than the Company’s budget. As a result of Core FFO growth exceeding the budget, the CHC Committee approved the 20222023 annual cash incentive award attributable to Core FFO at 125% of target.
Core FFO Growth Achieved | Award | |
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
| ||
<2% | 0% | |
2% – <3% | 50% | |
3% – <4% | 75% | |
4% – <6% | 100% | |
6% – 7% | 125% | |
>7% | 150% | |
Actual Result – | 125% |
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 59
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
With respect to the strategic management goals component of the annual cash incentive program, the CHC Committee considered theeach NEOs’ achievement of his or her specific goals tiedlinked to the Company’s strategy, including:strategic objectives.
Joseph D. Russell, Jr.
For Mr. Russell, the CHC Committee established 10 goals across five strategic objectives for 2023, including (1) delivering strong shareholder results, (2) increasing capital allocation through development, growing the Public Storage® brand, and energy efficiency initiatives, (3) achieving strong employee engagement, succession planning for critical roles in the Company, and reducing employee turnover, (4) enhancing the customer experience and optimizing the Company’s operating model, and (5) optimizing expenses to deliver strong NOI. Tom Boyle For Mr. Boyle, the CHC Committee established 14 goals across five strategic objectives for 2023, including (1) delivering strong shareholder results, (2) increasing capital allocation through development, growing the Public Storage® brand, and energy efficiency initiatives, (3) continuing the digital transformation of the Company’s business and operations and succession planning for critical roles in the Company, (4) enhancing the Company’s tenant insurance program, and (5) optimizing expenses to deliver strong NOI. 54 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation Natalia N. Johnson For Ms. Johnson, the CHC Committee established 14 goals across five strategic objectives for 2023, including (1) achieving strong employee engagement, succession planning for critical roles in the Company, and reducing employee turnover, (2) continuing the digital transformation of the Company’s business and operations and enhancing data science modeling, (3) enhancing the customer experience and optimizing the Company’s operating model, (4) enhancing the Company’s cybersecurity and digitization efforts, and (5) optimizing expenses to deliver strong NOI. Nathaniel A. Vitan For Mr. Vitan, the CHC Committee established 12 goals across five strategic objectives for 2023, including (1) enhancing the Company’s enterprise risk management program and corporate governance processes, (2) continuing climate readiness activities and improving the Company’s sustainability profile, (3) optimizing the Company’s operating model, and (4) optimizing expenses to deliver strong NOI.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Based on the Company’s Core FFO growth and management’s performance against strategic management goals, the CHC Committee certified the following annual cash incentive awards were paid on average at 112% of target.for our named executive officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
NEO |
| Target Award |
| Total Award Achieved |
| Certified Annual Cash Incentive Award | ||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
| $ | 2,000,000 |
| 111% |
| $ | 2,220,000 |
H. Thomas Boyle |
| $ | 900,000 |
| 111% |
| $ | 994,500 |
Natalia N. Johnson |
| $ | 700,000 |
| 113% |
| $ | 791,000 |
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
| $ | 425,000 |
| 85% |
| $ | 361,250 |
20202021 Multi-Year Performance-Based Stock Option Awards.In March 2020,February 2021, the CHC Committee granted each of our NEOs multi-year performance-based options. This was the CHC Committee’s first use of multi-year performance awards. Multi-year performance awards were adopted in response to shareholder feedback emphasizing the importance of long-term performance-based equity compensation and have remainedare a core piece of the Company’s annual NEO compensation programs each year since.programs.
The 20202021 multi-year performance-based options were based on the Company’s achievement of net asset value (NAV) per share growth and total shareholder value (TSV) growth over the three-year period from January 1, 20202021 through December 31, 2022.2023. Over the three-year performance-period, the Company achieved NAV growth of 43%50.8% and TSV growth of 60%70.1%. As a result, the CHC Committee approved the earningcertified performance of the 2020 performance-based optionsthese goals at 125% of target.
NAV Growth (2021-2023) | TSV Growth (2021-2023) | Award | ||
≤9% | ≤20% | 0% | ||
>9% – 13% | >20% – 24% | 75% | ||
>13% – 17% | >24% – 28% | 100% | ||
>17% | >28% | 125% | ||
Actual Result – 50.8% | Actual Result – 70.1% | 125% |
60 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 55
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
The 2021 performance-based options were further subject to adjustment based on the Company’s TSR performance (including change in share price and dividends paid) over the three-year performance period as measured relative to the TSR of the S&P 500 Equity REITs (70% weighting) and the Company’s self-storage REIT competitors (Extra Space, CubeSmart, and Life Storage). Over the three-year performance period, the Company achieved TSR 2,189 basis points greater than the weighted performance of the S&P 500 Equity REITs and the self-storage REIT competitors (excluding Life Storage as a result of its acquisition by Extra Space in 2023). As a result, the CHC Committee certified the TSR modifier as +25% of target.
RELATIVE TSR MODIFIER | ||||||||||
| | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
TSR Performance Achieved | Modifier | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
Below 250 bps | -25% | |||||||||
+/- 250 bps | 0% | |||||||||
Greater than 250 bps | +25% | |||||||||
Actual Result – |
|
|
|
Accordingly, the number of 20202021 performance-based options earned by each NEO was as follows: Mr. Russell, 103,275;123,930; Mr. Boyle, 77,456;100,692; Ms. Johnson, 64,546;77,456; and Mr. Vitan, 64,546,77,456, in each case as adjusted pursuant to the anti-dilution provisions of the Public Storage 2016 Equity and Performance-Based Incentive Compensation Plan for the special cash dividend of $13.15 per common share of Common Stock paid on August 4, 2022. Three-fifths of these options vested on March 6, 2023February 16, 2024 following certification of performance by the CompensationCHC Committee, and the remaining portion will vest ratably over the next two years.
Other Outstanding Multi-Year Performance-Based Awards. Given that the three-year performance periods of the 2021 multi-year performance-based option awards2022 and the 20222023 multi-year performance-based option and RSU awards do not end until December 31, 20232024 and December 31, 2024,March 14, 2026, respectively, no portion of these awards were earned in 2022.2023. Below is the status of each of the Company’s multi-year performance-based equity awards granted since 2020:2021:
56 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 61
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
20232024 COMPENSATION OUTLOOK AND ENHANCEMENTS
As a result of our consistently strong “Say-on-Pay”“Say-on-Pay” support by investors, which most recently garnered 93.7%98.4% support “for” in 2022,2023, the CHC Committee elected to maintain a similar compensation program design for 2023.2024, subject to several adjustments described below. In February 2023,2024, the CHC Committee approved a compensation program for our NEOs that continues to emphasize performance-based incentive compensation. The CHC Committee believes the 20232024 compensation program aligns our NEOs’ interests with those of our shareholders by incentivizing our executives to create sustainable long-term value. Additionally, as previously announced, David Lee, our Chief Operating Officer, was appointed as an executive officer of the Company effective February 21, 2023. We expect that Mr. Lee will be one of our NEOs for 2023 and, accordingly, have included him in the description of our 2023 compensation program below.
The following summarizes the incentive components of our 20232024 compensation program:
• LTIP Unit Awards. In February 2024, the CHC Committee approved providing the NEOs the option to elect to receive AO LTIP Unit awards and/or LTIP Unit awards in lieu of traditional stock option and RSU awards, respectively. LTIP Units are structured as “profits interests” for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As profits interests, LTIP Units only have value, other than with respect to the right to receive |
|
|
62 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 57
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
The CHC Committee allowed each NEO to elect to receive any or all 2024 stock option awards and performance-based stock option awards in the form of AO LTIP Unit awards with equivalent terms and 2024 performance-based RSU awards in the form of LTIP Unit awards with equivalent terms. Each NEO has elected to receive his or her total 2024 equity award in AO LTIP Units and LTIP Units.
The CHC Committee also permitted NEOs and trustees to substitute, on a one-for-one basis, certain of their then-outstanding RSU awards for LTIP Unit awards with equivalent terms and their then-outstanding stock option awards for AO LTIP Unit awards with equivalent terms. All substituted awards remained subject to the same vesting and other material terms and conditions as those that applied to the original awards.
58 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
The following summarizes the key elements of our 20232024 compensation program:
Compensation Type | Pay Element |
| ||||||||
Fixed Pay | Cash Compensation | Base Salary | • Base salaries are as follows: Mr. Russell—$ | |||||||
At-Risk Pay | Annual | • Eligibility will be based on two criteria: (i) Core FFO growth • Bonus targets | ||||||||
Equity Compensation | Time-Based Stock Options/ AO LTIP Units | • New component for 2024 • 20% of each NEO’s total equity award will be in the form of time-based AO LTIP Units • Awards will vest 20% per year over five years beginning one year from the date of grant • The CHC Committee approved the following dollar value of time-based AO LTIP Unit awards subject to the above vesting conditions: Mr. Russell—$1,410,000; Mr. Boyle—$850,000; Ms. Johnson—$635,000; and Mr. Vitan—$324,000 | ||||||||
Multi-Year Performance-Based | • Program • 20% of each NEO’s total equity award will be in the form of performance-based AO LTIP Units and 60% of the award will be in the form of performance-based LTIP Units • Three-fifths of earned awards will vest at the conclusion of the three-year (March 2024 – March 2027) performance period, with the remaining vesting ratably over the next two years • The CHC Committee approved the following target dollar value of performance-based Mr. Russell—$ |
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 59
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
TAX DEDUCTIBILITY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—SECTION 162(m)162(m)
The CHC Committee considers the tax deductibility of compensation as one factor when considering executive compensation program alternatives. Due to its tax status as a REIT, the Company must generally distribute its taxable income to shareholders. To the extent that compensation is not deductible, taxable income will be higher and so distributions to shareholders may be higher than they would be otherwise.
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 63
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
The CHC Committee has in the past approved and has reserved the right in the future to approve compensation that does not qualify for deductibility in circumstances it deems in the Company’s best interests.
Prior to January 1, 2018, Section 162(m) imposed a $1,000,000 per person limit on the annual tax deduction for compensation paid to the Company’s current CEO and certain other executive officers.
Certain “performance-based” compensation exceeding $1,000,000 annually paid to the executives was excluded from Section 162(m)’s limitation and was deductible if certain requirements were met. The Company generally designed awards of stock options, certain restricted stock units, and cash incentives to qualify as deductible “performance-based” compensation.
The tax reform legislation signed into law on December 22, 2017 (the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act), further limited the deductibility of executive compensation, effective January 1, 2018. Section 162(m) still imposes a $1,000,000 per person limit on the annual tax deduction for compensation paid to the Company’s current CEO and certain other executive officers. But, the legislation repealed the exclusion for “performance-based” compensation and expanded the group of employees subject to the limitation to include the chief financial officer and certain former executive officers.
Compensation awarded before November 3, 2017, which otherwise qualified as “performance based,” may continue to be deductible in the future as the cash compensation is paid, the restricted stock units vest, and the stock options are exercised, under certain interim relief provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. However, due to ambiguities and uncertainties about how the revised Section 162(m) should apply, it is uncertain whether previous awards that the CHC Committee believed to be “performance based” compensation will be deductible going forward.
Under the 2021 Plan, the limit on the aggregate value of cash and non-cash awards, other than stock options and SARs, that the Company may grant to any individual in any calendar year, is $15 million.
6460 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
COMPENSATION AND HUMAN CAPITALand Human Capital COMMITTEE REPORT
The CHC Committee of the Board of Trustees of Public Storage has reviewed and discussed with management the foregoing Compensation Discussion and Analysis. Based on this review and discussion, the CHC Committee recommended to the Board of Trustees that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Storage for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.2023.
The following independent trustees, who comprise the CHC Committee, provide this report:
The Compensation and Human Capital Committee
Avedick B. Poladian (Chair)
Michelle Millstone-Shroff
Shankh S. Mitra
Ronald P. Spogli
Paul S. Williams
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 6561
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES
Summary Compensation Table. The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation earned by each of our NEOs for the years ended December 31, 2023, 2022, and 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Name and Principal |
| Year |
| Salary |
|
| Bonus |
|
| Stock |
|
| Option |
|
| Non-Equity |
|
| All Other |
|
| Total |
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
| 2023 |
| $ | 900,000 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 3,165,047 |
|
| $ | 2,473,044 |
|
| $ | 2,220,000 |
|
| $ | 18,200 |
|
| $ | 8,776,291 |
|
President and Chief |
| 2022 |
|
| 800,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,977,156 |
|
|
| 3,062,086 |
|
|
| 1,350,000 |
|
|
| 12,200 |
|
|
| 9,201,442 |
|
Executive Officer |
| 2021 |
|
| 800,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 5,518,800 |
|
|
| 2,630,953 |
|
|
| 1,396,800 |
|
|
| 11,600 |
|
|
| 10,358,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
H. Thomas Boyle |
| 2023 |
| $ | 600,000 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 2,658,700 |
|
| $ | 2,077,467 |
|
| $ | 994,500 |
|
| $ | 13,200 |
|
| $ | 6,343,867 |
|
Chief Financial and |
| 2022 |
|
| 550,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2,852,985 |
|
|
| 2,196,661 |
|
|
| 948,750 |
|
|
| 12,200 |
|
|
| 6,560,596 |
|
Investment Officer |
| 2021 |
|
| 550,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,851,662 |
|
|
| 2,137,649 |
|
|
| 960,300 |
|
|
| 11,600 |
|
|
| 7,511,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Natalia N. Johnson |
| 2023 |
| $ | 530,000 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 1,980,862 |
|
| $ | 1,558,100 |
|
| $ | 791,000 |
|
| $ | 13,200 |
|
| $ | 4,873,162 |
|
Chief Administrative |
| 2022 |
|
| 500,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,901,835 |
|
|
| 1,464,406 |
|
|
| 565,000 |
|
|
| 12,200 |
|
|
| 4,443,441 |
|
Officer |
| 2021 |
|
| 500,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2,621,430 |
|
|
| 1,644,345 |
|
|
| 582,000 |
|
|
| 11,600 |
|
|
| 5,359,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
| 2023 |
| $ | 425,000 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 1,013,296 |
|
| $ | 791,886 |
|
| $ | 361,250 |
|
| $ | 13,200 |
|
| $ | 2,604,632 |
|
Chief Legal Officer and |
| 2022 |
|
| 425,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,493,468 |
|
|
| 1,150,019 |
|
|
| 448,375 |
|
|
| 12,200 |
|
|
| 3,529,062 |
|
Corporate Secretary |
| 2021 |
|
| 425,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2,414,475 |
|
|
| 1,644,345 |
|
|
| 467,500 |
|
|
| 11,600 |
|
|
| 4,962,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
David Lee(5) |
| 2023 |
| $ | 278,256 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 656,777 |
|
| $ | 244,408 |
|
| $ | — |
|
| $ | 13,200 |
|
| $ | 1,192,641 |
|
Former Chief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Principal Position | Year | Salary | Bonus | Stock Awards(1) | Option Awards(2) | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(3) | All Other Compensation(4) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | 2022 | $ | 800,000 | $ | — | $ | 3,977,156 | $ | 3,062,086 | $ | 1,350,000 | $ | 12,200 | $ | 9,201,442 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
President and Chief Executive Officer | 2021 | 800,000 | — | 5,518,800 | 2,630,953 | 1,396,800 | 11,600 | 10,358,153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 700,000 | — | 1,695,600 | 1,758,928 | 630,000 | 16,400 | 4,800,928 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
H. Thomas Boyle | 2022 | $ | 550,000 | $ | — | $ | 2,852,985 | $ | 2,196,661 | $ | 948,750 | $ | 12,200 | $ | 6,560,596 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial and Investment Officer | 2021 | 550,000 | — | 3,851,662 | 2,137,649 | 960,300 | 11,600 | 7,511,211 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 550,000 | — | 1,271,700 | 1,319,196 | 495,000 | 11,400 | 3,647,296 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natalia N. Johnson | 2022 | $ | 500,000 | $ | — | $ | 1,901,835 | $ | 1,464,406 | $ | 565,000 | $ | 12,200 | $ | 4,443,441 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Administrative Officer | 2021 | 500,000 | — | 2,621,430 | 1,644,345 | 582,000 | 11,600 | 5,359,375 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 441,667 | — | 1,250,560 | 1,099,330 | 450,000 | 11,400 | 3,252,957 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | 2022 | $ | 425,000 | $ | — | $ | 1,493,468 | $ | 1,150,019 | $ | 448,375 | $ | 12,200 | $ | 3,529,062 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary | 2021 | 425,000 | — | 2,414,475 | 1,644,345 | 467,500 | 11,600 | 4,962,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 350,000 | — | 847,800 | 1,099,330 | 315,000 | 11,400 | 2,623,530 |
|
|
|
|
6662 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Grants of Plan-Based Awards.The following table sets forth information relating to estimated future payouts under non-equity incentive plan awards, stock options, and RSUs granted pursuant to our equity incentive plans during the year ended December 31, 2022,2023, to each of our NEOs. In 2024, each of Messrs. Russell, Boyle, and Vitan and Ms. Johnson substituted the below stock option and RSU awards for AO LTIP Unit awards and LTIP Unit awards, respectively, with equivalent terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
| Estimated Future Payouts |
|
| Estimated Future Payouts | All Other RSU |
|
| All Other |
|
| Exercise |
|
| Grant Date |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
| Grant |
| Threshold |
|
| Target |
|
| Maximum |
|
| Threshold |
|
| Target |
|
| Maximum |
|
| Awards |
|
| Options |
|
| Awards |
|
| Awards |
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Cash Incentive(4) |
|
|
|
| 500,000 |
|
|
| 2,000,000 |
|
|
| 2,500,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
RSUs |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2,630 |
|
|
| 10,520 |
|
|
| 21,040 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,165,047 |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Stock Options |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 10,138 |
|
|
| 40,555 |
|
|
| 81,110 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 288.56 |
|
|
| 2,473,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
H. Thomas Boyle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Cash Incentive(4) |
|
|
|
| 225,000 |
|
|
| 900,000 |
|
|
| 1,125,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
RSUs |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2,209 |
|
|
| 8,837 |
|
|
| 17,674 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2,658,700 |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Stock Options |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 8,517 |
|
|
| 34,068 |
|
|
| 68,136 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 288.56 |
|
|
| 2,077,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Natalia N. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Cash Incentive(4) |
|
|
|
| 175,000 |
|
|
| 700,000 |
|
|
| 875,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
RSUs |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,646 |
|
|
| 6,584 |
|
|
| 13,168 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,980,862 |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Stock Options |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 6,387 |
|
|
| 25,551 |
|
|
| 55,102 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 288.56 |
|
|
| 1,558,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Cash Incentive(4) |
|
|
|
| 106,250 |
|
|
| 425,000 |
|
|
| 531,250 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
RSUs |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 842 |
|
|
| 3,368 |
|
|
| 6,736 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,013,296 |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Stock Options |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,246 |
|
|
| 12,986 |
|
|
| 25,972 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 288.56 |
|
|
| 791,886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
David Lee(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Cash Incentive(4) |
|
|
|
| 106,250 |
|
|
| 425,000 |
|
|
| 531,250 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
RSUs |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 545 |
|
|
| 2,183 |
|
|
| 4,366 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 656,777 |
|
Performance-Based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
Stock Options |
| 3/15/2023 |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,002 |
|
|
| 4,008 |
|
|
| 8,016 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 288.56 |
|
|
| 244,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name | Grant Date | Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards ($)(1) | Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (#)(1) | All Other Awards | All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options | Exercise or Base | Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Incentive(4) | 300,000 | 1,200,000 | 1,500,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-Based RSUs | 2/28/22 | — | — | — | 2,137 | 8,551 | 17,102 | — | — | — | 3,977,156 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-Based Stock Options | 2/28/22 | — | — | — | 7,553 | 30,213 | 60,426 | — | — | 355.02 | 3,062,086 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
H. Thomas Boyle | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Incentive(4) | 206,250 | 825,000 | 1,031,250 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-Based RSUs | 2/28/22 | — | — | — | 1,533 | 6,134 | 12,268 | — | — | — | 2,852,985 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-Based Stock Options | 2/28/22 | — | — | — | 5,418 | 21,674 | 43,348 | — | — | 355.02 | 2,196,661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natalia N. Johnson | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Incentive(4) | 125,000 | 500,000 | 625,000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-Based RSUs | 2/28/22 | — | — | — | 1,022 | 4,089 | 8,178 | — | — | — | 1,901,835 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-Based Stock Options | 2/28/22 | — | — | — | 3,612 | 14,449 | 28,898 | — | — | 355.02 | 1,464,406 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Incentive(4) | 106,250 | 425,000 | 531,250 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-Based RSUs | 2/28/22 | — | — | — | 802 | 3,211 | 6,422 | — | — | — | 1,493,468 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance-Based Stock Options | 2/28/22 | — | — | — | 2,836 | 11,347 | 22,694 | — | — | 355.02 | 1,150,019 |
|
|
|
|
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 6763
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Option Exercises and Stock Vested In 2022.2023. The following table provides information about options exercised by and RSU awards vested for the NEOs during the year ended December 31, 2022.2023.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Name |
| Number of |
|
| Value |
|
| Number of |
|
| Value |
| ||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 7,550 |
|
|
| 2,260,810 |
|
H. Thomas Boyle |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 5,069 |
|
|
| 1,519,161 |
|
Natalia N. Johnson |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,980 |
|
|
| 1,184,281 |
|
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2,830 |
|
|
| 844,602 |
|
David Lee(3) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
Name | Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) | Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1) | Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) | Value | ||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | — | — | 3,800 | 1,359,884 | ||||
H. Thomas Boyle | — | — | 2,569 | 909,387 | ||||
Natalia N. Johnson | — | — | 2,480 | 882,334 | ||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | — | — | 1,330 | 450,925 |
|
|
Name | |||||||
RSU |
| ||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | 2/16/2023 | 299.56 | |||||
2/28/2023 | 298.95 | ||||||
3/8/2023 | 300.87 | ||||||
H. Thomas Boyle | 2/16/2023 | 299.56 | |||||
2/28/2023 | 298.95 | ||||||
3/8/2023 | 300.87 | ||||||
12/31/2023 | 305.00 | ||||||
Natalia N. Johnson | 2/16/2023 | 299.56 | |||||
2/28/2023 | 298.95 | ||||||
3/5/2023 | 304.82 | ||||||
3/8/2023 | 300.87 | ||||||
8/4/2023 | 275.69 | ||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | 2/16/2023 | 299.56 | |||||
2/28/2023 | 298.95 | ||||||
5/27/2023 | 286.69 | ||||||
12/31/2023 | 305.00 |
6864 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Outstanding Equity Awards in 2022.2023. The following table sets forth certain information concerning outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs at December 31, 2022.2023. In 2024, each of Messrs. Russell, Boyle, and Vitan and Ms. Johnson substituted the below stock option and RSU awards for AO LTIP Unit awards and LTIP Unit awards, respectively, with equivalent terms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
|
| Option Awards |
|
| Stock Awards(1) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
| Grant |
| Number of |
|
| Number of |
|
| Equity |
|
| Option |
|
| Option |
|
| Number of |
|
| Market |
|
| Equity |
|
| Equity |
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
| 3/15/2023(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 40,555 |
|
| 288.56 |
|
| 3/14/2033 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
|
| 3/15/2023(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 10,520 |
|
|
| 3,208,600 |
|
|
| 2/28/2022(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 62,404 |
|
| 343.76 |
|
| 2/27/2032 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
|
| 2/28/2022(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 17,102 |
|
|
| 5,216,110 |
|
|
| 2/16/2021(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 123,930 |
|
| 222.66 |
|
| 2/15/2031 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
|
| 2/16/2021(3) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 15,000 |
|
|
| 4,575,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2/16/2021(4) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 5,400 |
|
|
| 1,647,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 3/6/2020(5) |
|
| 61,965 |
|
|
| 41,310 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 221.68 |
|
| 3/5/2030 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
| 3/8/2019(4) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 750 |
|
|
| 228,750 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 3/8/2019(4) |
|
| 16,524 |
|
|
| 4,131 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 207.52 |
|
| 3/7/2029 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
| 3/8/2019(6) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2,500 |
|
|
| 762,500 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 2/28/2018(6) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,875 |
|
|
| 571,875 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 3/10/2017 |
|
| 20,655 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 213.09 |
|
| 3/9/2027 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
| 7/1/2016 |
|
| 25,818 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 245.79 |
|
| 6/30/2026 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
|
| TOTAL |
|
| 124,962 |
|
|
| 45,441 |
|
|
| 226,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 25,525 |
|
|
| 7,785,125 |
|
|
| 27,622 |
|
|
| 8,424,710 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
H. Thomas Boyle |
| 3/15/2023(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 34,068 |
|
|
| 288.56 |
|
| 3/14/2033 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| 3/15/2023(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 8,837 |
|
|
| 2,695,285 |
|
|
| 2/28/2022(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 44,766 |
|
|
| 343.76 |
|
| 2/27/2032 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| 2/28/2022(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 12,268 |
|
|
| 3,741,740 |
|
|
| 2/16/2021(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 100,692 |
|
|
| 222.66 |
|
| 2/15/2031 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| 2/16/2021(3) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 10,000 |
|
|
| 3,050,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2/16/2021(4) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 4,050 |
|
|
| 1,235,250 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 3/6/2020(5) |
|
| 46,473 |
|
|
| 30,983 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 221.68 |
|
| 3/5/2030 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
| 3/8/2019(4) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 600 |
|
|
| 183,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 3/8/2019(4) |
|
| 12,392 |
|
|
| 3,099 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 207.52 |
|
| 3/7/2029 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
| 3/8/2019(6) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,875 |
|
|
| 571,875 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 12/31/2017(6) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 300 |
|
|
| 91,500 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 12/5/2016 |
|
| 15,491 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 205.71 |
|
| 12/4/2026 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
|
| TOTAL |
|
| 74,356 |
|
|
| 34,082 |
|
|
| 179,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16,825 |
|
|
| 5,131,625 |
|
|
| 21,105 |
|
|
| 6,437,025 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Natalia N. Johnson |
| 3/15/2023(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 25,551 |
|
|
| 288.56 |
|
| 3/14/2033 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| 3/15/2023(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 6,584 |
|
|
| 2,008,120 |
|
|
| 2/28/2022(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 29,844 |
|
|
| 343.76 |
|
| 2/27/2032 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| 2/28/2022(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 8,178 |
|
|
| 2,494,290 |
|
|
| 2/16/2021(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 77,456 |
|
|
| 222.66 |
|
| 2/15/2031 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| 2/16/2021(3) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 6,000 |
|
|
| 1,830,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2/16/2021(4) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,240 |
|
|
| 988,200 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 8/4/2020(4) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 800 |
|
|
| 244,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 3/6/2020(5) |
|
| 38,727 |
|
|
| 25,819 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 221.68 |
|
| 3/5/2030 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
| 3/8/2019(4) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 450 |
|
|
| 137,250 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 3/8/2019(4) |
|
| 8,260 |
|
|
| 2,067 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 207.52 |
|
| 3/7/2029 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
| 3/8/2019(6) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,000 |
|
|
| 305,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 3/5/2018(6) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 900 |
|
|
| 274,500 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 8/5/2016 |
|
| 10,327 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 225.38 |
|
| 8/4/2026 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
|
| TOTAL |
|
| 57,314 |
|
|
| 27,886 |
|
|
| 132,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12,390 |
|
|
| 3,778,950 |
|
|
| 14,762 |
|
|
| 4,502,410 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
| 3/15/2023(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 12,986 |
|
|
| 288.56 |
|
| 3/14/2033 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| 3/15/2023(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 3,368 |
|
|
| 1,027,240 |
|
|
| 2/28/2022(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 23,436 |
|
|
| 343.76 |
|
| 2/27/2032 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| 2/28/2022(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 6,422 |
|
|
| 1,958,710 |
|
|
| 2/16/2021(2) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 77,456 |
|
|
| 222.66 |
|
| 2/15/2031 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| 2/16/2021(3) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 6,000 |
|
|
| 1,830,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2/16/2021(4) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 2,700 |
|
|
| 823,500 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
| 3/6/2020(5) |
|
| 38,727 |
|
|
| 25,819 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 221.68 |
|
| 3/5/2030 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
| 5/27/2019(4) |
|
| 4,130 |
|
|
| 2,066 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 228.74 |
|
| 5/26/2029 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| ||
| 5/27/2019(6) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 1,000 |
|
|
| 305,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
| 12/31/2017(6) |
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| 200 |
|
|
| 61,000 |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
| |
|
| TOTAL |
|
| 42,857 |
|
|
| 27,885 |
|
|
| 113,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9,900 |
|
|
| 3,019,500 |
|
|
| 9,790 |
|
|
| 2,985,950 |
|
Option Awards(1) | Stock Awards(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable(3) | Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) Unexercisable(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)(4) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares of Stock that Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2)(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | 2/28/2022 | — | — | 62,404 | 343.76 | 2/28/2032 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17,102 | 4,791,809 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | 123,930 | 222.66 | 2/16/2031 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 18,750 | (5) | 5,253,563 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 7,200 | (3) | 2,017,368 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2020 | — | — | 103,275 | 221.68 | 3/6/2030 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/8/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,500 | (3) | 420,285 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/8/2019 | 12,393 | 8,262 | — | 207.52 | 3/8/2029 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/8/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | 3,125 | (6) | 875,594 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/28/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | 2,500 | (6) | 700,475 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/10/2017 | 20,655 | — | — | 213.09 | 3/10/2027 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
7/1/2016 | 25,818 | — | — | 245.79 | 7/1/2026 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL | 58,866 | 8,262 | 289,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 33,075 | 9,267,285 | 17,102 | 4,791,809 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
H. Thomas Boyle | 2/28/2022 | — | — | 44,766 | 343.76 | 2/28/2032 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12,268 | 3,437,371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | 100,692 | 222.66 | 2/16/2031 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 12,500 | (5) | 3,502,375 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 5,400 | (3) | 1,513,026 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2020 | — | — | 77,456 | 221.68 | 3/6/2030 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/8/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,200 | (3) | 336,228 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/8/2019 | 9,294 | 6,197 | — | 207.52 | 3/8/2029 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/8/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | 2,344 | (6) | 656,765 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/2017 | — | — | — | — | — | 450 | (6) | 126,086 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/5/2016 | 15,491 | — | — | 205.71 | 12/5/2026 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL | 24,785 | 6,197 | 222,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 21,894 | 6,134,480 | 12,268 | 3,437,371 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natalia N. Johnson | 2/28/2022 | — | — | 29,844 | 343.76 | 2/28/2032 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,178 | 2,291,394 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | 77,455 | 222.66 | 2/16/2031 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 7,500 | (5) | 2,101,425 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 4,320 | (3) | 1,210,421 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/4/2020 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,200 | (3) | 336,228 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2020 | — | — | 64,546 | 221.68 | 3/6/2030 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/8/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | 900 | (3) | 252,171 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/8/2019 | 6,195 | 4,132 | — | 207.52 | 3/8/2029 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/8/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,250 | (6) | 350,238 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/5/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,200 | (6) | 336,228 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
8/5/2016 | 10,327 | — | — | 225.38 | 8/5/2026 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL | 16,522 | 4,132 | 171,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16,370 | 4,586,711 | 8,178 | 2,291,394 |
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 6965
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Option Awards(1) | Stock Awards(2) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name | Grant Date | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable(3) | Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) Unexercisable(3) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)(4) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares of Stock that Have Not Vested ($) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)(4) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($)(2)(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | 2/28/2022 | — | — | 23,436 | 343.76 | 2/28/2032 | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/28/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6,422 | 1,799,380 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | 77,455 | 222.66 | 2/16/2031 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 7,500 | (5) | 2,101,425 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16/2021 | — | — | — | — | — | 3,600 | (3) | 1,008,684 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2020 | — | — | 64,546 | 221.68 | 3/6/2030 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/27/2019 | 2,065 | 4,131 | — | 228.74 | 5/27/2029 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5/27/2019 | — | — | — | — | — | 1,250 | (6) | 350,238 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/2018 | — | — | — | — | — | 80 | (3) | 22,415 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12/31/2017 | — | — | — | — | — | 300 | (6) | 84,057 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TOTAL | 2,065 | 4,131 | 165,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12,730 | 3,566,819 | 6,422 | 1,799,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
These performance-based RSUs vest in five equal annual installments, beginning one year following certification by the CHC Committee of the level of achievement of the performance targets at the conclusion of the one-year performance period. (4) These options or RSUs vest in five equal annual installments, beginning one year from the grant date. (5) Three-fifths of these performance-based options vested following certification by the CHC Committee of achievement of applicable performance targets at the conclusion of the three-year performance period, with the remaining vesting ratably over the subsequent two years beginning one year from March 6, 2023. (6) These RSUs vest in eight equal installments, beginning one year from the grant date. |
70 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
Payments upon Termination. We do not have employment agreements with any NEO that provide for future payments upon termination of employment with the Company.
We do not have a formal severance policy for payments upon termination of employment, whether through voluntary or involuntary termination, other than as specifically set forth in our 2021 Plan (and applicable predecessor plans), 401(k) Plan, Retirement Equity Vesting Policy, or as required by law. TheSubject to the special circumstances noted below, the following indicates our general practice:
•
•
•
Payments upon Death or Disability. In the event of the death or permanent and total disability of an NEO:
•
•
|
•
Payments upon Retirement. NEOs participate in our Retirement Equity Vesting Policy on the same terms as other employees. The Retirement Equity Vesting Policy is intended to recognize long-tenured employees who have contributed to the growth and success of the Company. Specifically, in the event of an NEO’s qualifying retirement:
•
|
|
66 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 71
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
In order for an NEO to be eligible for potential acceleration of equity award vesting under the Retirement Equity Vesting Policy, all eligibility conditions must be satisfied, including: (1) the NEO must be at least 55 years old and have been in service for at least 10 years, and the sum of the employee’s age and total years of service must be at least 80; (2) the NEO must provide at least 12 months’ prior written notice of his or her intention to retire; (3) the NEO must enter into a written separation agreement; and (4) the Equity Awards Committee of the Board must, in its sole discretion, approve the application of the Retirement Equity Vesting Policy to the NEO.
Payments upon Change in Control. Under the 2021 Plan, the vesting of outstanding awards will not accelerate unless two conditions are met. First, the Company must experience a qualifying change in control. Second, one of the following conditions must also be met: (a) for a change of control where such awards will be assumed or continued by the surviving entity, the holder’s employment must be terminated without “cause” (as defined in the 2021 Plan) within one year following the change of control, or (b) such awards must be terminated in connection with the change of control.
If the awards are to be terminated in connection with a change of control, then:
•
|
A “change of control” is defined in the plan to include generally the following:
•
•
•
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 67
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
72 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Estimated Value of Accelerated Awards.The following table shows the estimated value of the acceleration of vesting of unvested equity awards pursuant to the termination events described above that trigger acceleration assuming the event occurred as of December 31, 2022,2023, and using the value of our Common Stockcommon shares on December 30, 202229, 2023 (the last trading day of the year) of $280.19$305.00 per share. Mr. Lee, who ceased serving as an executive officer during 2023, did not receive any accelerated payments as a result of his termination of service, and his equity awards as of the termination of his service were forfeited.
Name | Value of all outstanding unvested options(1) | Value of all outstanding unvested RSUs(2) | Total | ||||||||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | |||||||||||||||
Death or Disability Termination | $ | 11,396,148 | $ | 11,663,189 | $ | 23,059,337 | |||||||||
Qualifying Retirement | 11,396,148 | 10,385,242 | 21,781,390 | ||||||||||||
Termination on Change of Control | 11,396,148 | 10,385,242 | 21,781,390 | ||||||||||||
All Other Terminations | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
H. Thomas Boyle | |||||||||||||||
Death or Disability Termination | $ | 8,844,160 | $ | 7,853,165 | $ | 16,697,325 | |||||||||
Qualifying Retirement(3) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Termination on Change of Control | 8,844,160 | 6,936,384 | 15,780,544 | ||||||||||||
All Other Terminations | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Natalia N. Johnson | |||||||||||||||
Death or Disability Termination | $ | 7,047,536 | $ | 5,732,407 | $ | 12,779,943 | |||||||||
Qualifying Retirement(3) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Termination on Change of Control | 7,047,536 | 5,121,313 | 12,168,849 | ||||||||||||
All Other Terminations | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | |||||||||||||||
Death or Disability Termination | $ | 6,959,803 | $ | 4,466,509 | $ | 11,426,312 | |||||||||
Qualifying Retirement(3) | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
Termination on Change of Control | 6,959,803 | 3,986,543 | 10,946,346 | ||||||||||||
All Other Terminations | — | — | — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Name | Value of all outstanding unvested options(1) | Value of all outstanding unvested RSUs(2) | Total | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Death or Disability Termination | $ | 14,715,759 |
|
| $ | 13,601,780 |
|
| $ | 28,317,539 |
|
|
Qualifying Retirement |
| 14,049,035 |
|
|
| 9,958,555 |
|
|
| 24,007,590 |
|
|
Termination on Change of Control |
| 14,049,035 |
|
|
| 9,958,555 |
|
|
| 24,007,590 |
|
|
All Other Terminations |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
H. Thomas Boyle |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Death or Disability Termination | $ | 11,734,651 |
|
| $ | 9,697,780 |
|
| $ | 21,432,431 |
|
|
Qualifying Retirement(3) |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
Termination on Change of Control |
| 11,174,573 |
|
|
| 6,690,785 |
|
|
| 17,865,358 |
|
|
All Other Terminations |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Natalia N. Johnson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Death or Disability Termination | $ | 9,150,516 |
|
| $ | 7,034,215 |
|
| $ | 16,184,731 |
|
|
Qualifying Retirement(3) |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
Termination on Change of Control |
| 8,730,457 |
|
|
| 4,818,390 |
|
|
| 13,548,847 |
|
|
All Other Terminations |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
Death or Disability Termination | $ | 8,900,009 |
|
| $ | 5,026,095 |
|
| $ | 13,926,104 |
|
|
Qualifying Retirement(3) |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
Termination on Change of Control |
| 8,686,519 |
|
|
| 3,835,680 |
|
|
| 12,522,199 |
|
|
All Other Terminations |
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 73
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
SEC rules require us to disclose the ratio of annual total compensation of our CEO, Joseph D. Russell, Jr., to the annual total compensation of our median employee (excluding Mr. Russell). As of December 31, 2022,2023, we had 5,8646,200 talented and dedicated employees performing the following functions:
|
|
•
•
The ratio presented below is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules. We selected the median employee based on the 5,8646,200 full-time and part-time workers employed by the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 2022.2023. In identifying our median employee, we used annual base wages, and for those employees who were employed by us for less than the full fiscal year, we annualized their compensation. We did not apply any cost-of-living adjustments as part of the calculation.
Based on these calculations, our median employee is one of our 4,7375,078 employees who work at one of our self-storage facilities serving our customers. This employee is paid on an hourly basis. The 20222023 annual total compensation for our median employee as determined based on SEC rules was $33,379.$31,827. The 20222023 annual total compensation for our CEO as determined based on SEC rules was $9,201,442.$8,776,291. The ratio of our CEO’s annual total compensation to our median employee’s total compensation for fiscal year 20222023 is 276 to 1.
74 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 69
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLES
The following table sets forth information, 2021, 2020, and 2019.
Year | Summary Compensation Table Total Pay for CEO (1)(2) | CAP to CEO (3) | Average Summary Compensation Table Total Pay for Other NEOs (1)(2) | Average CAP to Other NEOs (3) | Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on: | GAAP Net Income (5) | Core FFO per share (6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
TSR | Peer TSR (4) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | $ | 9,201,442 | $ | (1,902,305 | ) | $ | 4,844,366 | $ | (2,183,334 | ) | $ | 163 | $ | 130 | $ | 4,366,274 | $ | 15.92 | ||||||||||||||
2021 | 10,358,153 | 41,035,570 | 5,944,502 | 25,331,675 | 205 | 178 | 1,959,639 | 12.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 4,800,928 | 4,537,499 | 3,174,594 | 2,999,877 | 123 | 123 | 1,361,227 | 10.61 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 4,289,200 | 3,360,014 | 2,854,897 | 1,378,312 | 109 | 127 | 1,525,651 | 10.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| Summary Compensation Table Total Pay |
|
|
| Average Summary Compensation Table Total Pay for |
| Average CAP |
| Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on: |
|
| GAAP Net |
| Core FFO |
| ||||||||||
Year | for CEO(1)(2) |
| CAP to CEO(3) |
| Other NEOs(1)(2) |
| to Other NEOs(3) |
| TSR |
| Peer TSR(4) |
|
| Income(5) |
| per share(6) |
| ||||||||
2023 | $ | 8,776,291 |
| $ | 11,147,987 |
| $ | 3,753,576 |
| $ | 4,390,198 |
| $ | 178 |
| $ | 143 |
|
| $ | 2,160,120 |
| $ | 16.89 |
|
2022 |
| 9,201,442 |
|
| (1,902,305 | ) |
| 4,844,366 |
|
| (2,183,334 | ) |
| 163 |
|
| 126 |
|
|
| 4,366,274 |
|
| 15.92 |
|
2021 |
| 10,358,153 |
|
| 41,035,570 |
|
| 5,944,502 |
|
| 25,331,675 |
|
| 205 |
|
| 166 |
|
|
| 1,959,639 |
|
| 12.93 |
|
2020 |
| 4,800,928 |
|
| 4,537,499 |
|
| 3,174,594 |
|
| 2,999,877 |
|
| 123 |
|
| 116 |
|
|
| 1,361,227 |
|
| 10.61 |
|
2019 |
| 4,289,200 |
|
| 3,360,014 |
|
| 2,854,897 |
|
| 1,378,312 |
|
| 109 |
|
| 126 |
|
|
| 1,525,651 |
|
| 10.75 |
|
| SCT Total Pay |
| Minus |
| Plus |
| Plus |
| Plus |
| Plus |
| Minus |
| Plus |
| Equals |
| |||||||||
CEO | $ | 8,776,291 |
| $ | 5,638,091 |
| $ | 5,947,587 |
| $ | 834,144 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 921,756 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 306,300 |
| $ | 11,147,987 |
|
Other NEOs | $ | 3,753,576 |
| $ | 2,745,374 |
| $ | 2,658,422 |
| $ | 483,373 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 432,901 |
| $ | 318,646 |
| $ | 125,946 |
| $ | 4,390,198 |
|
Year | SCT Total Pay | Minus SCT Equity Awards | Plus Value of New Unvested Awards as of 12/31 | Plus Annual Change in Value of Prior Years Awards that Remain Unvested | Plus Value of New Vested Awards | Plus Change in Value of Prior Years Awards that Vested During Year | Minus Value of Forfeited Prior Years Awards | Plus Dividends on Unvested Awards/ Accrued Dividends | Equals CAP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | $ | 9,201,442 | $ | 7,039,242 | $ | 6,790,064 | $ | (11,479,301 | ) | $ | — | $ | (74,804 | ) | $ | — | $ | 699,536 | $ | (1,902,305 | ) | |||||||||||||||
2021 | 10,358,153 | 8,149,753 | 23,991,640 | 14,299,544 | — | 382,986 | — | 153,000 | 41,035,570 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 4,800,928 | 3,454,528 | 2,426,400 | 627,126 | — | 24,573 | — | 113,000 | 4,537,499 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 4,289,200 | 2,873,000 | 1,479,800 | 166,619 | — | 152,395 | — | 145,000 | 3,360,014 |
70 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 75
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Year | SCT Total Pay | Minus SCT Equity Awards | Plus Value of New Unvested Awards as of 12/31 | Plus Annual Change in Value of Prior Years Awards that Remain Unvested | Plus Value of New Vested Awards | Plus Change in Value of Prior Years Awards that Vested During Year | Minus Value of Forfeited Prior Years Awards | Plus Dividends on Unvested Awards/ Accrued Dividends | Equals CAP | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | $ | 4,844,366 | $ | 3,686,458 | $ | 3,555,957 | $ | (7,193,033 | ) | $ | — | $ | (68,454 | ) | $ | — | $ | 364,288 | $ | (2,183,334 | ) | |||||||||||||||
2021 | 5,944,502 | 4,771,302 | 14,860,625 | 8,860,496 | — | 349,979 | — | 87,375 | 25,331,675 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 3,174,594 | 2,295,972 | 1,771,553 | 271,223 | — | 20,974 | — | 57,505 | 2,999,877 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2,854,897 | 1,928,880 | 1,147,777 | 49,699 | — | 68,772 | 892,020 | 78,067 | 1,378,312 |
Share Price Volatility Impact On CAP.
For example, in 2021, our share price increased 62% for the year (one of the biggest one yearone-year changes in our history) and 64% from our March 2020 award grant dates. This historic share price change was the principal driver of the more than 500% increase in the value of our unvested March 2020 performance option awards in 2021, and thus the principal cause of 2021 CAP being significantly higher than 2021 SCT total pay. In 2022, our share price decreased by 25%, which resulted in a more than 38% decrease in the value of the March 2020 performance options and resulted in 2022 CAP being negative and well below 2022 SCT total pay.
CAP Compared to Realized Pay.
The following table illustrates the significant difference between CAP and realized pay, in each case as compared to SCT total pay. Realized pay as set forth in this table is the aggregate value of cash compensation paid (computed consistently with SCT total pay and CAP), the value of dividends and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
| CEO |
|
| Other NEOs (Average) |
| ||||||||||||||
Year | SCT Total Pay |
| Realized Pay |
| CAP |
|
| SCT Total Pay |
| Realized Pay |
| CAP |
| ||||||
2023 | $ | 8,776,291 |
| $ | 11,298,478 |
| $ | 11,147,987 |
|
| $ | 3,753,576 |
| $ | 4,775,273 |
| $ | 4,390,198 |
|
2022 |
| 9,201,442 |
|
| 5,431,540 |
|
| (1,902,305 | ) |
|
| 4,844,366 |
|
| 2,590,905 |
|
| (2,183,334 | ) |
2021 |
| 10,358,153 |
|
| 3,845,336 |
|
| 41,035,570 |
|
|
| 5,944,502 |
|
| 2,231,378 |
|
| 25,331,675 |
|
2020 |
| 4,800,928 |
|
| 2,400,973 |
|
| 4,537,499 |
|
|
| 3,174,594 |
|
| 1,427,702 |
|
| 2,999,877 |
|
2019 |
| 4,289,200 |
|
| 2,166,281 |
|
| 3,360,014 |
|
|
| 2,854,897 |
|
| 1,497,059 |
|
| 1,378,312 |
|
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 71
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
CEO | Other NEOs (Average) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year | SCT Total Pay | Realized Pay | CAP | SCT Total Pay | Realized Pay | CAP | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2022 | $ | 9,201,442 | $ | 5,431,540 | $ | (1,902,305 | ) | $ | 4,844,366 | $ | 2,590,905 | $ | (2,183,334 | ) | ||||||||||||||
2021 | 10,358,153 | 3,845,336 | 41,035,570 | 5,944,502 | 2,231,378 | 25,331,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2020 | 4,800,928 | 2,400,973 | 4,537,499 | 3,174,594 | 1,427,702 | 2,999,877 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 4,289,200 | 2,166,281 | 3,360,014 | 2,854,897 | 1,497,059 | 1,378,312 |
Relationship of CAP to Performance.
72 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 77
Proposal 2: Approve Executive Compensation
Financial Performance Measures.
Significant Financial Performance Measures |
Core FFO Per Share Growth |
TSR Performance (versus the TSR of the S&P 500 Equity |
TSR Performance (versus the Company’s Self-Storage REIT Competitors) |
The Board recommends a vote
of the compensation of our NEOs
as described in this proxy statement.
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 7973
Share Ownership of Trustees and Management
The following table sets forth information as of March 13, 20235, 2024 concerning the beneficial ownership of common shares of Common Stock by each of our trustees the CEO, the CFO, and the other two most highly compensated persons who were executive officers of the Company on December 31, 2022,NEOs and all trustees and executive officers as a group. Except as otherwise indicated and subject to applicable community property and similar statutes, each trustee and executive officer has sole voting and investment power over his or her shares.
Name | Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned(1) | Percent of Class(1) | ||||||
Ronald L. Havner, Jr. | 861,554 | (2) | * | |||||
Tamara Hughes Gustavson | 17,286,434 | (3) | 9.8 | % | ||||
Leslie S. Heisz | 28,269 | * | ||||||
Michelle Millstone-Shroff | 15,662 | * | ||||||
Shankh S. Mitra | 16,159 | (4) | * | |||||
David J. Neithercut | 16,508 | * | ||||||
Rebecca Owen | 10,759 | * | ||||||
Kristy M. Pipes | 15,489 | * | ||||||
Avedick B. Poladian | 77,467 | * | ||||||
John Reyes | 605,819 | * | ||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. | 142,258 | * | ||||||
Tariq M. Shaukat | 27,063 | * | ||||||
Ronald P. Spogli | 55,055 | * | ||||||
Paul S. Williams | 16,067 | * | ||||||
H. Thomas Boyle | 83,861 | * | ||||||
Natalia N. Johnson | 64,712 | * | ||||||
Nathaniel A. Vitan | 44,273 | * | ||||||
All trustees and executive officers as a group (18 persons) | 19,367,802 | (2)(3)(4) | 10.9 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Name |
| Directly Owned(1) |
| Subject to Rights to Acquire Within 60 Days(2) |
|
|
| Total Common Shares |
| Percent of | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Trustees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Ronald L. Havner, Jr. |
|
| 315,623 |
|
|
|
| 518,991 |
|
|
|
| 834,614 |
| (4) |
| * |
|
| |
Tamara Hughes Gustavson |
|
| 17,276,108 |
|
|
|
| 20,489 |
|
|
|
| 17,296,597 |
| (5) |
|
| 9.8 | % |
|
Leslie S. Heisz |
|
| 1,998 |
|
|
|
| 31,379 |
|
|
|
| 33,377 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Shankh S. Mitra |
|
| 7,563 |
|
|
|
| 19,310 |
|
|
|
| 26,873 |
| (6) |
| * |
|
| |
David J. Neithercut |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 27,291 |
|
|
|
| 27,291 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Rebecca Owen |
|
| 874 |
|
|
|
| 20,598 |
|
|
|
| 21,472 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Kristy M. Pipes |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 25,762 |
|
|
|
| 25,762 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Avedick B. Poladian |
|
| 31,163 |
|
|
|
| 51,467 |
|
|
|
| 82,630 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
John Reyes |
|
| 155,315 |
|
|
|
| 375,738 |
|
|
|
| 531,053 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Tariq M. Shaukat |
|
| 828 |
|
|
|
| 31,343 |
|
|
|
| 32,171 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Ronald P. Spogli |
|
| 12,163 |
|
|
|
| 53,539 |
|
|
|
| 65,702 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Paul S. Williams |
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 26,597 |
|
|
|
| 26,597 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Named Executive Officers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Joseph D. Russell, Jr. |
|
| 23,471 |
|
|
|
| 225,481 |
|
|
|
| 248,952 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
H. Thomas Boyle |
|
| 12,727 |
|
|
|
| 154,430 |
|
|
|
| 167,157 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Natalia N. Johnson |
|
| 9,910 |
|
|
|
| 119,463 |
|
|
|
| 129,373 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
Nathaniel A. Vitan |
|
| 5,114 |
|
|
|
| 102,240 |
|
|
|
| 107,354 |
|
|
| * |
|
| |
David Lee |
|
| 392 |
|
|
|
| — |
|
|
|
| 392 |
| (7) |
| * |
|
| |
All trustees and executive officers as a group (16 persons) |
|
| 17,852,857 |
|
|
|
| 1,804,118 |
|
|
|
| 19,656,975 |
| (3)(4)(5)(6)(8) |
|
| 11.1 | % |
|
80
* Less than 1%
74 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
Share Ownership of Trustees and Management
|
|
|
The following table sets forth information as of the dates indicated with respect to persons known to us to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of theour outstanding shares of Common Stock:
Name and Address | Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned | Percent of Class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Vanguard Group(1) 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, PA 19355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 20,619,751 | 11.7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Tamara Hughes Gustavson(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17,286,434 | 9.8 | % | |||||||||||||||
BlackRock, Inc.(3) 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16,781,174 | 9.6 | % | |||||||||||||||
State Street Corporation(4) State Street Financial Center One Lincoln Street Boston, MA 02111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 11,358,471 | 6.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Cohen & Steers, Inc.(5) 280 Park Avenue 10th Floor New York, NY 10017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 9,044,538 | 5.2 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
common shares:
|
| |||||||||
|
| Common Shares Beneficially Owned | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Name and Address |
| Number of Shares |
| Percent of Class | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
The Vanguard Group(1) |
|
| 20,726,179 |
|
|
|
| 11.8 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Tamara Hughes Gustavson(2) |
|
| 17,296,597 |
|
|
|
| 9.8 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
BlackRock, Inc.(3) |
|
| 16,202,474 |
|
|
|
| 9.2 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
State Street Corporation(4) |
|
| 11,446,962 |
|
|
|
| 6.5 | % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 8175
Additional Information About Trustees, Executive Officers, and Management
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT TRUSTEES, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND MANAGEMENT
Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy (Clawback Policy).TheIn 2023, the Board has adopted anamended the Company’s Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy, whichPolicy. The amended policy applies to our executive officers, our controller, and our Executive Vice President, Finance Operations. Pursuant to thisand Accounting. The policy provides for mandatory clawback in certain situations in compliance with recent SEC and NYSE rules. Specifically, in the event the Company’s financial results (a) are restated due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement, the Company is required (except in limited circumstances) to recover the amount of excess incentive compensation received by any covered officer.
The policy also provides for clawbacks in circumstances that go beyond those subject to mandatory clawback under SEC and NYSE rules. In the event the Company restates or (b) haverevises a non-GAAP financial measure, other than in connection with a restatement, due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirement or if such measure has been determined by the Board to have been materially misstated, then an independent committee of the BoardCHC Committee may requirerecover any excess incentive compensation directly tied to the non-GAAP measure received by any covered officer to repay toofficer.
The clawback period for both the mandatory and discretionary recoupment covers the three completed fiscal years preceding the date the Company alldetermines that the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement or part of any “Excess Compensation” that such officer had previously received.to restate or revise a non-GAAP measure, as applicable. Excess Compensation is defined as that part of the cash or equity incentive compensation received byis any compensation that is granted, earned, or vested based wholly or in part upon the attainment of a covered officer during the three-year period preceding the restatement or material misstatement determinationfinancial reporting measure that was in excess of the amount that such covered officer would have received had such incentive compensation been calculated based ontaking into account the restated financial results or the restated or correctedrevised non-GAAP financial results. measure, as applicable. Our Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy has been filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Securities Trading Policy. The Company is analyzingBoard has adopted a Securities Trading Policy that governs the new clawback rules proposed by the NYSE in February 2023 and will make any necessary amendments to the Clawback Policy in advancepurchase, sale, and/or other disposition of the Company’s securities by trustees, officers, and employees, and the Company itself. The Securities Trading Policy is designed to promote compliance deadline.with insider trading laws, rules, and regulations, and NYSE listing standards.
Anti-Hedging Policy. Our insider trading policySecurities Trading Policy includes an anti-hedging provision that prohibits trustees, officers, and employees from directly or indirectly engaging in hedging against future declines in the market value of any securities of the Company. Hedging transactions include the purchase of financial instruments, including prepaid variable forward contracts, instruments for the short sale or purchase or sale of call or put options, equity swaps, collars, or units of exchangeable funds, that are designed to or that may reasonably be expected to have the effect of hedging or offsetting a decrease in the market value of any securities of the Company. The objective of this policy is to enhance alignment between the interests of our trustees, officers, and employees and those of our shareholders.
Policy Regarding Pledging of Shares.Our securities trading policySecurities Trading Policy discourages (but does not prohibit) our insiders from pledging Company common shares of Common Stock or holding Company common shares of Common Stock in a margin account. None of our trustees or executive officers currently pledge their Common Stock.common shares. Mr. Havner beneficially owns 315,623 shares held in a family trust account of which he and his spouse are trustees. These shares are in a margin account, and, since January 1, 2023, these shares have served, and may in the future serve, as collateral for a
76 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Additional Information About Trustees, Executive Officers, and Management
margin loan. Mr. Mitra holds 7,1217,563 shares in a margin account, and, since January 1, 2022, these shares have served, and may in the future serve, as collateral for a margin loan. We believe that, given the number of shares involved and his financial profile,Mr. Havner’s and Mr. Mitra’s existingrespective financial profiles, neither arrangement does not presentpresents a significant risk of lender foreclosure or an unexpected sale of large volumes of Common Stockcommon shares by insiders on the open market. In our Board’s view, thisthese arrangements isare unlikely to result in adverse effects to shareholders.
Related Party Transaction Approval Policies and Procedures.The Audit Committee, in accordance with its charter, reviews and approves, as applicable, all related party transactions involving our executive officers and trustees Shurgard, and prior to its merger with affiliates of Blackstone, Inc. (Blackstone) in July 2022, PS Business Parks, unless approved by the Board (with the interested trustees abstaining) or by another independent committee of the Board.Shurgard. In addition, our trustees and executive officers are required to disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest to the Company. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Trustee’s Code of Ethics and the NGS Committee charter, our NGS Committee is responsible for evaluating any actual or potential conflicts of interest relating to our executive officers and trustees and for making recommendations to the Board with respect to any action to be taken. Any trustee with an actual, potential, or apparent conflict of interest may not participate in the decision-making process related to the conflict.
82 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Additional Information About Trustees, Executive Officers, and Management
Relationships and Transactions with the Hughes Family. Tamara Hughes Gustavson, a trustee, holds less than a 0.1% equity interest in, and is a manager of, a limited liability company that owns 65 self-storage facilities in Canada. Two of Ms. Gustavson’s adult children own the remaining equity interest in the limited liability company. These facilities operate under the Public Storage®Storage® trade name under a royalty-free, non-exclusive license agreement in place since 1993, when the Hughes family privately owned both the U.S. concern that ultimately became the Public Storage REIT, and the company owning the Canadian facilities.
With respect to this relationship, the Company does not make any payments to the entity that owns the Canadian facilities or its affiliates, and the owner and its affiliates do not make any payments to the Company. Our subsidiaries reinsure risks relating to any loss of goods stored by customers in these facilities and received a portion of the premiums paid by such customers (net of amounts retained by a third party program administrator and insurance company) of approximately $2.2$2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.2023. We have a right of first refusal, subject to limitations, to acquire these facilities or the applicable ownership entities if their owners agree to sell them.
Trademark Agreement and Transactions with Shurgard.Pursuant to a trademark license agreement, we receive monthly royalty fees from Shurgard for the use of the Shurgard®Shurgard® tradename equal to 1% of Shurgard’s gross revenues. Shurgard paid us $3.5$3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022,2023, for royalty fees in connection with its use of the Shurgard®Shurgard® tradename.
Common Management/Board Members with Shurgard and PS Business Parks. Shurgard. Ronald L. Havner, Jr., Chairman of Public Storage, is alsoserved as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Shurgard. Additionally, prior to PS Business Parks’ merger with affiliates of Blackstone in July 2022, Mr. Havner served as PS Business Parks’Shurgard until May 2023 and is currently Chairman of the Board of DirectorsEmeritus. Tom Boyle, Chief Financial and each of Joseph D. Russell, Jr., President and CEO and TrusteeInvestment Officer of Public Storage and Kristy M. Pipes, Trustee of Public Storage,has served as directorsa director of PS Business Parks.Shurgard since May 2023.
Sale of Interest in PS Business Parks and Related Transactions. On July 20, 2022, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated April 24, 2022, PS Business Parks completed a merger transaction (the PSB Merger) with affiliates of Blackstone. In connection with the PSB Merger, each share of PS Business Parks common stock and each common unit of partnership interest we held in PS Business Parks, totaling to a 41% common equity interest in PS Business Parks, were converted into the right to receive the merger consideration of $187.50 per share or unit, including a $5.25 per share or unit closing cash dividend, and a $0.22 per share or unit prorated quarterly cash dividend, for a total of $187.72 per share or unit. As a result, at closing of the PSB Merger, we received a total of $2.7 billion of cash proceeds in exchange for our 41% common equity interest.
Additionally, on July 8, 2022, we acquired the commercial interests of PS Business Parks at three sites, totaling five properties, jointly occupied with certain of our self-storage facilities in Maryland and Virginia, for $47.3 million.
Other Arrangements with PS Business Parks. Until closing of the PSB Merger, Public Storage and PS Business Parks had the following additional arrangements:
|
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 8377
Additional Information About Trustees, Executive Officers, and Management
|
|
|
84 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 3:
Advisory Vote to Approve
the Frequency of Future
Advisory Votes on
ProposExecutive Compensational 3:
| ||||
|
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 85
Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve the Frequency
PROPOSAL 3
ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
As required under applicable regulations of the SEC, we are providing shareholders with an advisory vote on how often to hold the advisory shareholder vote to approve executive compensation. Under this proposal, shareholders may vote to hold the advisory vote to approve executive compensation every one, two, or three years.
When we last submitted this proposal for consideration at the Company’s 2017 annual meeting of shareholders, more than 89% of the votes cast supported the holding of executive compensation advisory votes on an annual basis. Even though that vote, as is the vote on this proposal, was advisory in nature and not binding on the Board, the Board considered the result of the vote in deciding to provide for advisory votes to approve executive compensation annually.
The Board believes that the one-year frequency best achieves the intended objectives of the advisory vote to approve executive compensation. This gives shareholders the opportunity to provide feedback to the CHC Committee on how its decisions in the immediately-completed fiscal year, as well as outlook and anticipated decisions in the current fiscal year, are reflective of and further the CHC Committee’s overarching goals of (1) aligning executive compensation with company performance, (2) incentivizing our executive officers to create long-term shareholder value, and (3) emphasizing future pay opportunity over current pay. Having this information on an annual basis gives the CHC Committee the ability to proactively consider incremental adjustments in response to year-to-year changes in the level of shareholder support.
This vote is advisory and not binding on the Board. However, the Board and the CHC Committee value all shareholder feedback and will consider the outcome of the vote in deciding on the frequency of future advisory votes to approve executive compensation.
VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION
Shareholders may vote to hold future advisory votes on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs every one year, every two years, or every three years. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is necessary for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the frequency of future advisory votes to approve the compensation of our NEOs. Since shareholders have several voting choices, it is possible that no single option will receive a majority of the votes cast. In the event no option receives a majority of the votes cast, we will consider the option receiving the most votes to be approved, on an advisory basis, by our shareholders. For purposes of the vote on this proposal, abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the vote.
The Board recommends a vote to hold
future advisory votes on the compensation of
the Company’s NEOs every 1 YEAR
86 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 4:
Ratification of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has appointed EY as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Consolidated Financial Statements of Public Storage and its subsidiaries for the year ending December 31, | ||||||
RECOMMENDATION: Vote FOR ratification of the appointment of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm for the |
78 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 87
Proposal 4:3: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
PROPOSAL 3
PROPOSAL 4
RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, and oversight of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has appointed EY as the independent registered public accounting firm for Public Storage for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.2024. The Audit Committee believes that the selection of EY is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders and has recommended that the Board submit the appointment of EY to the Company’s shareholders for ratification.
Although we are not required to seek shareholder ratification of the appointment of EY as the independent registered public accounting firm, Public Storage is asking its shareholders to do so because it believes that shareholder ratification of the appointment is a matter of good corporate practice. Ratification of the appointment of EY requires approval by a majority of the votes cast at the meeting. For these purposes, abstentions will not be counted. If the shareholders do not ratify the appointment of EY, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain EY as the independent registered public accounting firm for Public Storage, but may nevertheless determine to do so. Even if the shareholders ratify the appointment of EY, the Audit Committee may change the appointment at any time during the year if it determines that a change would be in the best interest of Public Storage and its shareholders.
A representative of EY will be present at our Annual Meeting, where the representative will be afforded an opportunity to make a statement and to respond to appropriate questions.
FEES BILLED TO THE COMPANY BYFees Billed to the Company by EY FORfor 2023 and 2022 AND 2021
The following table shows the fees billed or expected to be billed to Public Storage by EY for audit and other services provided for fiscal 20222023 and 2021:2022:
2022 | 2021 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| 2023 |
| 2022 |
| ||||||||||||||
Audit Fees | $ | 1,318,000 | $ | 1,588,000 |
| $ |
| 1,600,000 |
|
| $ |
| 1,318,000 |
| ||||
Audit-Related Fees | $ | — | 60,000 |
| $ |
| — |
|
| $ |
| — |
| |||||
Tax Fees | $ | 259,000 | 257,200 |
| $ |
| 151,000 |
|
| $ |
| 259,000 |
| |||||
All Other Fees | — | — |
| $ |
| — |
|
| $ |
| — |
| ||||||
Total | $ | 1,577,000 | $ | 1,905,200 |
| $ |
| 1,751,000 |
|
| $ |
| 1,577,000 |
|
Audit Fees.Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audits of Public Storage’s annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, review of the quarterly financial statements included in Public Storage’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and services in connection with the Company’s registration statements and securities offerings.
Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees represent professional services for auditing the financial statements of the 401(k) Plan.
Tax Fees.In 20222023 and 2021,2022, tax fees included $157,000$151,000 and $59,200,$157,000, respectively, for preparation of federal and state income tax returns for Public Storage and its consolidated entities andentities. In 2022, tax fees also included $102,000 and $198,000, respectively, for various tax consulting matters.
88 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 79
Proposal 4:3: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies.Pre-Approval Policies. The Audit Committee has approved a policy concerning the pre-approval of audit and non-audit services to be provided by EY. The policy requires that all services provided by EY to us, including audit services, audit-related services, tax services, and other services, must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
In 20222023 and 2021,2022, our Audit Committee pre-approved all services performed for us by EY.
Audit Committee ReportAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities include appointing the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, pre-approving audit and non-audit services provided by the firm, and assisting the Board in providing oversight to the Company’s financial reporting process. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee meets with the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors, and management to review accounting, auditing, internal controls, and financial reporting matters.
In connection with its oversight responsibilities related to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Audit Committee met with management and EY, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and reviewed and discussed with them the audited consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee discussed with EY the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees, as modified or supplemented. The discussion included, but was not limited to, the overall scope and plans for the annual audit, the results of their procedures, including critical audit matters addressed during the audit, their evaluation of the Company’s internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.
In addition to providing the required written disclosures and communications, EY also provided to the Audit Committee the letter confirming EY’s independence of the Company as required by the applicable rules of the PCAOB, and the Audit Committee discussed with EY their independence. In addition, the Audit Committee has considered whether EY’s provision of non-audit services to the Company and its affiliates is compatible with EY’s independence.
The Audit Committee met with representatives of management, the internal auditors, legal counsel, and EY regularly throughout the year to discuss the progress of management’s testing and evaluation of the Company’s system of internal controls over financial reporting in response to the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related SEC regulations. At the conclusion of this process, the Audit Committee received from management its assessment and report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, the Audit Committee received from EY its assessment of and opinion on the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022.2023. The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the results of management’s assessment and EY’s audit.
80 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
Proposal 3: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022,2023, for filing with the SEC. The Audit Committee also approved the appointment of EY as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023,2024, and recommended that the Board submit this appointment to the Company’s shareholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting.
The Audit Committee
Kristy M. Pipes (Chair)
Rebecca Owen
Avedick B. Poladian
Tariq M. Shaukat
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 89
Proposal 4: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is necessary for the ratification of the appointment of EY as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023.2024. For purposes of the vote on this proposal, abstentions will not affect the vote.
The Board recommends a vote FOR
the Appointment of EY as our
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
for the Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2023.2024.
90 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 5:
Shareholder Proposal
Regarding Greenhouse
Gas Reduction Targets
| ||||
|
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 9181
Proposal 5: Shareholder Proposal Regarding Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets
PROPOSAL 5
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING
GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION TARGETS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We received the following proposal from As You Sow, 2020 Milvia Street, Suite 500, Berkeley, California 94704, which it filed on behalf of Longview Largecap 500 Index Fund and Handlery Hotels Inc., each of which has represented to us that it is the beneficial owner of shares of our Common Stock in an amount and for a period of time sufficient to meet the requirements to file the proposal, and whose shareholdings will be provided by us upon request.
In accordance with SEC rules, we are presenting the text of the proposal and supporting statement in this proxy statement as they were submitted to us. All statements contained in the shareholder proposal and supporting statement are the sole responsibility of the proponent. Additionally, none of the websites referenced in the shareholder proposal shall be considered to be a part of or incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. The shareholder proposal is required to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting only if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.
As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote “AGAINST” the shareholder proposal.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL
WHEREAS: The increasing rate and number of climate-related disasters affecting society are raising alarms globally, making the corporate sector’s contribution to climate mitigation a significant policy issue.
In addition to environmental and social harms, climate change is creating systemic risk to the economy. The latest IPCC publication states that the window for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (1.5°C), and thereby avoiding the most catastrophic impacts of climate change, is quickly narrowing. Immediate, sharp emissions reduction is required of all market sectors and industries.1
Shareholders are increasingly concerned about the growing material climate risk to their companies and to their portfolios. In response, the Climate Action 100+ initiative, a coalition of more than 700 investors with over $68 trillion in assets, issued a Net Zero Benchmark (“Benchmark”) outlining metrics that create climate accountability for companies and transparency for shareholders. Indicators 1 through 5 of the Benchmark seek reporting on companies’ net zero emissions ambition; short, medium, and long-term greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions goals; and strategic actions planned to achieve decarbonization targets.2
Public Storage has not established medium or long-term emissions reduction targets or issued a report addressing if and how it plans to reduce emissions in alignment with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal. In contrast, 51 North American companies in the real estate sector have committed to establish valid GHG targets through the Science Based Targets initiative.3
As the world’s leading owner and operator of self-storage facilities, Public Storage faces material risks from climate change, including physical risk and regulatory risk associated with its large stock of buildings. By setting 1.5°C, Paris-aligned GHG reduction targets for its Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions,
|
|
|
92 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 5: Shareholder Proposal Regarding Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets
disclosing a net zero climate transition plan, and demonstrating progress toward achieving its goals, Public Storage can provide investors with assurance that management is reducing its climate contribution and addressing the risks and opportunities associated with climate change.
RESOLVED: Shareholders request that the Board issue short and long-term Scope 1-3 greenhouse gas reduction targets aligned with the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C goal requiring Net zero emissions by 2050.
SUPPORTING STATEMENT: Proponents suggest, at management’s discretion, that the targets:
Take into consideration approaches used by advisory groups such as the Science Based Targets initiative;
A timeline for setting a net zero by 2050 GHG reduction target, and 1.5°C aligned interim targets;
An enterprise-wide climate transition plan to achieve 1.5°C aligned emissions; and
Annual progress towards meeting its emissions reduction goals.
STATEMENT FROM PUBLIC STORAGE’S BOARD REGARDING THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL
After careful consideration, the Board recommends a vote “AGAINST” this proposal. Our commitment to sustainability is rooted in our core values, central to our strategy and operations, and supported by our strong governance practices. We are committed to setting and achieving increasingly ambitious emissions reduction targets. As described below, we have taken important actions to address climate-related risks and enhance the overall sustainability of our business, and we have committed to do more. We believe that we must complete necessary foundational steps before setting net zero greenhouse gas reduction targets, particularly in light of the SEC’s pending climate-disclosure rules, the enhanced scrutiny placed on such disclosures by the SEC’s Climate and ESG Task Force within the Division of Enforcement, and the International Sustainability Standards Board’s (ISSB) pending climate and sustainability disclosure rules. Understanding these rules and completing foundational steps, including enhancing our data collection processes and internal controls, will allow us to make informed, responsible decisions about how to set and track our performance against data-driven goals and most effectively manage our resources to achieve our commitments. We honor and strive to achieve the commitments we make and, accordingly, we believe that the proposal’s prescriptive, one-size-fits-all approach is not in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders at this time.
We have taken important steps to address climate-related risks responsibly and enhance our overall sustainability, which efforts have been acknowledged by the proponent during our engagement meetings.
Since our founding over 50 years ago, we have been guided by the fundamental principle of “doing the right thing.” In this regard, and as noted above under “2022 Highlights—Sustainability Framework” beginning on page 3, we recognize the importance of operating in a responsible and sustainable manner that aligns with our long-term strategy and promotes the best interests of our Company and its stakeholders.
We support global efforts to mitigate the impact of climate change. We are fortunate that our property portfolio carries an inherently light environmental footprint, with carbon, water, and waste intensities that are on average 82% lower than other property types. Nevertheless, we take climate change and sustainability seriously, and over the past several years, we have taken important steps to improve our understanding and management of climate-related risks and opportunities.
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 93
Proposal 5: Shareholder Proposal Regarding Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets
As a result of our ongoing efforts, we now have solar power systems at nearly 200 properties and are committed to installing solar at over 1,000 properties by 2025—an increase of over 400%. In 2022, we generated 11.5 GWh of clean energy at these facilities, which our partners estimate saved CO2 emissions equivalent to 917,053 gallons of gasoline consumed or 9,017,068 pounds of coal burned. We also have 69 facilities that are Green Building certified through either the BREEAM® or LEED® certification programs, and we are working to double the number of certified facilities by the end of 2024. We have completed LED lighting conversions at nearly 2,500 properties, with commitments to complete LED lighting retrofits at all of our properties and to continuing the use of LED lighting at new properties that we acquire or develop. Through our environmentally-focused capital investments, we have realized a 27% reduction in our Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions (on a like-for-like basis) since 2018, and our properties emit 24% less carbon per square foot (on a same-store basis) than other public self-storage REITs (EXR, CUBE, and LSI).
These efforts have not gone unrecognized. We are the highest rated U.S. self-storage REIT across leading benchmarks, including GRESB, MSCI, and Sustainalytics, and our scoring has increased across these benchmarks by an average of 16% from 2021. The proponent has also acknowledged the importance of the progress we have made thus far during our engagement meetings regarding the proposal.
We are committed to pursuing and achieving increasingly ambitious emissions reduction targets, and we are laying a strong, data-driven foundation to help realize our goals.
Notwithstanding our strong results and achievements to date, our work to do even more continues. Led by our ESG Committee, as overseen by the Board and its committees, we are committed to continue to:
expand our greenhouse gas emissions inventory to include Scopes 1, 2, and 3 for the entire portfolio, while enhancing our data collection processes and internal controls;
analyze opportunities to work with our vendors and suppliers on emissions reductions;
monitor rapidly changing technologies related to emissions reductions;
enhance our internal processes and controls in anticipation of forthcoming SEC climate disclosure rules;
continue to evaluate the potential feasible pathways toward adopting medium and/or long-term greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets or other science-based, climate-focused targets aligned with the emissions reduction goals of the Paris Climate Agreement;
enhance our environmental management system further to infuse sustainability across our organization, enhance our program, and bolster the results of our sustainability efforts;
provide regular updates to our stakeholders on our ongoing efforts through our annual Sustainability Report; and
publicly disclose detailed information on our greenhouse gas emissions (consistent with TCFD standards), including through the CDP, as well as information on energy and water usage, green energy generation, and similar metrics.
With the assistance of our external partners, in 2022, we completed an SEC climate disclosure readiness exercise directed at ensuring we are able to source and disclose the climate data and information required by the SEC’s proposed climate rules in a manner consistent with our disclosure controls and procedures. We provided the Audit Committee updates on our SEC climate disclosure readiness exercise throughout the year and engaged with the Audit Committee on charting an appropriate path forward.
94 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
Proposal 5: Shareholder Proposal Regarding Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets
We view it as essential—and responsible—to gather the necessary data and establish the foundation from which we can set and track future climate-related goals and initiatives. We believe our shareholders and other stakeholders would be ill-served by us setting unverifiable, aspirational goals as opposed to data-driven goals. As discussed further below, we also believe that it is prudent to take time to understand the SEC’s final climate rules, as well as the ISSB disclosure standards—both of which are expected to be issued later this year—before we set additional goals given the heightened scrutiny to which climate-related goals and disclosures likely will soon be subject.
Our Board and management closely review and oversee our strategy, commitments, and progress on climate and sustainability matters.
Our Board is committed to effective oversight of our climate-related risks and ensuring progress across our sustainability initiatives. This commitment is reflected in the oversight responsibilities for these matters which are shared by our standing committees. In particular, our NGS Committee has formal responsibility for leading the Board’s oversight on climate and sustainability matters and overseeing our strategy, goals, targets, and policies. Our Board is supported in its oversight by our ESG Committee, comprising our CEO and other senior executives across functions including executive management, enterprise risk management, audit, real estate, operations, human resources, finance, legal, construction, architecture, and investor relations. Our ESG Committee assists executive management in setting strategy relating to climate and sustainability matters; implementing initiatives and policies based on that strategy; overseeing communications with our stakeholders; and assessing developments relating to, and improving our understanding of, climate-related risks and opportunities. Working together, our Board and management help ensure we are implementing a responsible climate and sustainability strategy that serves the best interests of the Company and all its stakeholders.
The proposal’s prescriptive timeline may hinder our ability to assess the impact of forthcoming regulatory developments properly.
During our engagement meetings with the proponent, we were urged to commit to setting net zero targets for Scopes 1, 2 and 3 emissions within 12 months and to setting near- and long-term targets within 24 months. As described above, we have been expanding our greenhouse gas emissions inventory to include Scopes 1, 2, and 3 for the entire portfolio, while enhancing our data collection processes and internal controls. We note that the SEC proposed expansive rules in March 2022 regarding the disclosure of public companies’ Scopes 1, 2, and 3 emissions and climate-related targets, goals, and transition plans. We are awaiting the SEC’s final rules, currently expected in the second quarter of 2023, to help guide and align our Scope 3 emissions data, disclosure, and strategy. We are cognizant that the SEC has also launched a Climate and ESG Task Force within the Division of Enforcement to identify ESG-related misconduct related to increased investor reliance on climate and ESG-related disclosure. Significant changes are also pending with respect to voluntary climate and sustainability disclosures, with the ISSB currently expected to release its final rules mid-year.
Accordingly, while we are aligned with As You Sow’s mission of addressing the impacts of climate change, we do not believe now is the appropriate time to establish short and long-term Scopes 1,2, and 3 greenhouse gas reduction targets aligned with the Paris Climate Agreement’s goal of net zero emissions by 2050. We do not make commitments lightly, and once made, we honor and strive to achieve them. This is evident in the climate-related achievements we have realized to date, and underlies our belief that the prudent path forward for all of our stakeholders is a thoughtful, reasoned, data-driven approach. As such, we do not believe it is responsible to commit to the proponent’s requested actions without first completing the necessary foundational steps, including reviewing and understanding the full implications of the SEC’s final climate rules and ISSB’s disclosure standards once issued. We believe these actions will allow us to make more informed and responsible decisions
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 95
Proposal 5: Shareholder Proposal Regarding Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets
about how to set and track our performance against data-driven goals, and prioritize our efforts and allocate our resources to achieve our goals and further climate commitments most effectively. For these reasons, we do not believe it is in our Company’s or our shareholders’ best interests to make the commitments in the proposal at this time.
We encourage our shareholders and other interested stakeholders to read more about our climate achievements and goals, as well as our broader approach to sustainability, in our annual Sustainability Report, which is available on our website at publicstorage.com.
VOTE REQUIRED AND RECOMMENDATION
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast is necessary for the approval of the shareholder proposal. For purposes of the vote on this proposal, abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the vote.
The Board recommends a vote AGAINST
the Shareholder Proposal Requesting that
the Board Issue Short- and Long-Term Scope 1-3
Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets Aligned with
the Paris Agreement
96 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
General Information About the Meeting
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING
Purpose of Proxy SolicitationPURPOSE OF PROXY SOLICITATION
We are providing these materials on behalf of the Board to ask for your vote and to solicit your proxies for the Annual Meeting or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
We have made these materials available to you on the Internet or, upon your request, delivered printed versions of these materials to you by mail, because you were a shareholder as of March 13, 2023,5, 2024, the record date (the record date) fixed by the Board, and are therefore entitled to receive the Notice of the Annual Meeting (Notice) and to vote on matters presented at the meeting.
Important Notice Regarding Delivery of Security Holder DocumentsIMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING DELIVERY OF SECURITY HOLDER DOCUMENTS
We are pleased to take advantage of the SEC rules that allow us to furnish proxy materials to you on the Internet. These rules allow us to provide our shareholders with the information they need, while lowering the costs of delivery and reducing the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting.
Our Annual Report to Shareholders (the Annual Report) includes a copy of our 20222023 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022,2023, as filed with the SEC on February 21, 2023,20, 2024, excluding exhibits. On or about March 22, 2023,25, 2024, we mailed you a Notice containing instructions on how to access this proxy statement and our Annual Report and vote over the Internet. If you received the Notice by mail, you will not receive a printed copy of the proxy materials in the mail. The Notice instructs you on how you may submit your proxy over the Internet. If you received the Notice by mail and would like a printed copy of our proxy materials, you should follow the instructions for requesting those materials included in the Notice.
Availability of Proxy Statement and Annual ReportAVAILABILITY OF PROXY STATEMENT AND ANNUAL REPORT
All shareholders receiving this proxy statement should have also received a paper copy or access to an electronic copy of the Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. 2023. Shareholders may request a free copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K, including financial statements and schedules, by sending a written request to: Public Storage, 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201, Attention: Investor Services. Alternatively, shareholders can access the Annual Report on Form 10-K and other financial information on the Investor Relations section of our website at publicstorage.com. Public Storage will also furnish any exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K upon written request and payment of a copying charge of 20 cents per page.
Date, Time, and Place of the Annual MeetingDATE, TIME, AND PLACE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING
The Annual Meeting will be held on Tuesday, May 2, 20237, 2024 at 8:11:00 a.m. Eastern Time at The Ritz-Carlton Georgetown, 3100 Sthe Millennium Downtown New York, 55 Church Street, NW, Washington, DC 20007.New York, New York 10007.
82 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
WHO CAN VOTEGeneral Information About the Meeting
Who Can Vote
If you are a holder of Common Stockcommon shares at the close of business on the record date, you may vote the common shares of Common Stock that you hold on that date at the Annual Meeting. For all matters submitted for vote at the Annual Meeting, each common share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote.
Quorum for the Annual MeetingQUORUM FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING
If a majority of the common shares of Common Stock outstanding on the record date is present in person or represented by proxy at the Annual Meeting, we will have a quorum, permitting business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting. As of the record date of March 13, 2023,5, 2024, we had 175,795,336175,703,491 common shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 97
General Information About the Meeting
We will count abstentions and shares held by brokers or nominees who have not received instructions from the beneficial owner (broker non-votes) as present for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting.
How Votes are CountedHOW VOTES ARE COUNTED
For the election of trustees, trustee nominees receiving an affirmative majority of votes cast (i.e., the number of shares cast “for” a trustee nominee must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that nominee) will be elected. Similarly, approval of Proposals 2 3, 4, and 53 require an affirmative majority of the votes cast (i.e., the number of shares cast “for” the proposal must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that proposal). For Proposal 3, since shareholders have several voting choices, it is possible that no single option will receive a majority of the votes cast. In the event no options receives a majority of the votes cast, we will consider the option receiving the most votes to be the option approved. For each of Proposals 1, 2, 3, 4, and 53, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote.
Although the advisory vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs in Proposal 2 is non-binding, the CHC Committee will consider the vote results when making future decisions regarding executive compensation. Similarly, although
Trustee Nominees Who Do Not Receive a Majority of the advisory vote to approve the frequency of future advisory votes to approve the compensation of our NEOs in Proposal 3 is Votes Castnon-binding, the CHC Committee will consider the vote results when determining the frequency of such future votes.
TRUSTEE NOMINEES WHO DO NOT RECEIVE A MAJORITY OF THE VOTES CAST
If a nominee who is currently serving as a trustee is not re-elected, Maryland law provides that the trustee would continue to serve on the Board as a “holdover” trustee.
However, under our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Trustees’ Code of Ethics, each trustee nominee who does not receive the required majority vote for election must submit a resignation. The NGS Committee would then make a recommendation to the Board about whether to accept or reject the resignation or take other action. The Board would act on the NGS Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days from the date the election results were certified. If the Board accepts a trustee’s resignation, it may fill the resulting vacancy or decrease the size of the Board as provided in our Bylaws.
How Proxies Will Be VotedHOW PROXIES WILL BE VOTED
If you hold shares through a broker or nominee and do not provide the broker or nominee with specific voting instructions, under the rules that govern brokers or nominees in such circumstances, your broker or nominee will have the discretion to vote such shares on routine matters, but not on non-routine matters. As a result:
Your broker or nominee will not have the authority to exercise discretion to vote such shares with respect to Proposals 1 2, 3, and 52 because NYSE rules treat these matters as non-routine. Yournon-routine. Your
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 83
General Information About the Meeting
broker or nominee will have the authority to exercise discretion to vote such shares with respect to Proposal 43 because that matter is treated as routine under NYSE rules.
Broker non-votes will be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote on any of the proposals.
If you are a registered shareholder and no instructions are indicated on a properly executed proxy card submitted by you, the shares represented by the proxy will be voted FOR (i) FOR each of Proposals 1, 2, and 4,3, and (ii) for the option to hold future advisory votes to approve the compensation of our NEOs every 1 YEAR in Proposal 3, (iii) AGAINST Proposal 5, and (iv) in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders as to any other matter that may be properly brought before the Annual Meeting, or any adjournments or postponements thereof.
How to Cast a Vote98 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
General Information About the Meeting
HOW TO CAST A VOTE
You may vote by any one of the following means:
• BY INTERNET: Shareholders who received a Notice about the Internet availability of our proxy materials may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the Notice. Shareholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction card by mail may submit proxies over the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card. • BY TELEPHONE: If provided on your proxy card or voting instruction card and if you live in the United States or Canada, you may submit proxies by telephone by calling the telephone number indicated on the card and following the instructions. When voting, you will need to have available the control number that appears on the card. • BY MAIL: Shareholders who have received a paper copy of a proxy card or voting instruction card by mail may submit proxies by completing, signing, and dating their proxy card or voting instruction card and mailing it in the accompanying self-addressed envelope. No postage is necessary if mailed in the United States. • IN PERSON AT THE ANNUAL MEETING: Shareholders who hold shares in their name as the shareholders of record may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Shareholders who are beneficial owners but not shareholders of record may vote in person at the Annual Meeting only with a legal proxy obtained from their broker, trustee, or nominee, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
Properly completed and submitted proxy cards and voting instruction cards, and proxies properly completed and submitted over the Internet, if received in time for voting and not revoked, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the instructions contained therein.
HOW TO VOTE AS A PARTICIPANT IN THE COMPANY’SHow to Vote as a Participant in the Company’s 401(K) PLANPlan
If you hold your common shares as a participant in the 401(k) Plan, your proxy will serve as a voting instruction for the trustee of the 401(k) Plan with respect to the number of common shares of Common Stock credited to your account as of the record date. If you provide voting instructions via your proxy card or voting instruction card with respect to your common shares of Common Stock held in the 401(k) Plan, the trustee will vote those common shares of Common Stock in the manner specified. The trustee will vote any common shares of Common Stock for which it does not receive instructions in the same proportion as the common shares of Common Stock for which voting instructions have been received by the trustee, unless the trustee is required by law to exercise its discretion in voting such shares.
84 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
General Information About the Meeting
To allow sufficient time for the trustee to vote your common shares, of Common Stock, the trustee must receive your voting instructions by 11:59 p.m., PacificEastern Time, on April 27, 2023.May 2, 2024.
Changing Your VoteCHANGING YOUR VOTE
You can change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at the Annual Meeting. To revoke your proxy, you must:
•
•
Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 99
General Information About the Meeting
submit a later dated proxy over the Internet in accordance with the instructions set forth on the Internet voting website; or
•
If not revoked, we will vote the proxy at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions indicated on the proxy card, voting instruction card or, if submitted over the Internet, as indicated on the submission.
Cost of this Proxy SolicitationCOST OF THIS PROXY SOLICITATION
We bear all proxy solicitation costs. In addition to solicitations by mail, our Board, our officers and our regular employees, without additional remuneration, may solicit proxies by telephone, facsimile, electronic transmission, and personal interviews.
We will request brokers, banks, custodians, and other fiduciaries to forward proxy soliciting materials to the beneficial owners of Common Stock.common shares. We will reimburse them for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with distributing proxy materials.
Contacting our Transfer AgentCONTACTING OUR TRANSFER AGENT
Please contact Public Storage’s transfer agent, at the phone number or address listed below, with any questions concerning share certificates, dividend checks, transfer of ownership, or other matters pertaining to your share account:
Computershare Investor Services
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3078
Phone: (781) 575-3120575-3120
Consideration of Candidates for TrusteeCONSIDERATION OF CANDIDATES FOR TRUSTEE
Shareholder Recommendations. The policy of the NGS Committee is to consider properly submitted shareholder recommendations of candidates for membership on the Board. Under this policy, only shareholders who would be entitled to submit shareholder proposals under the SEC rules may submit shareholder recommendations. In evaluating recommendations, the NGS Committee seeks to achieve a balance of knowledge, experience, and capability on the Board and to address the membership criteria described above. Any shareholder recommendations
Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement | 85
General Information About the Meeting
proposed for consideration by the NGS Committee should include the candidate’s name and qualifications for Board membership, including the information required under Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, and should be addressed to: Public Storage, 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
Deadline to Propose or Nominate Individuals to Serve as Trustees for the 20242025 Annual Meeting. To nominate an individual for election at the 20242025 annual meeting of shareholders (2024(2025 Annual Meeting), a shareholder must give timely notice to the Corporate Secretary in accordance with our Bylaws, which, in general, require that the notice be received by the Corporate Secretary no earlier than the close of business on November 23, 2023,25, 2024, and no later than the close of business on December 23, 2023,25, 2024, unless the date of mailing of the notice for the 20242025 Annual Meeting is movedadvanced by more than 30 days before or delayed by more than 60 days after the anniversary of the date of mailing of the notice for this year’s Annual
100 | Public Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement
General Information About the Meeting
Meeting, in which case the nomination must be delivered no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day and no later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the mailing of the notice for such meeting or the tenth day following the date we announce publicly the date of mailing of the notice for the 20242025 Annual Meeting.
In addition to satisfying the foregoing requirements under our Bylaws, to comply with the universal proxy rules under the Exchange Act, shareholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of trustee nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 3, 2024.
Proxy Access Nominees. Our Bylaws provide that a shareholder, or a group of up to 20 shareholders, owning at least 3% of Public Storage’s outstanding Common Stockcommon shares continuously for at least three years, may include in our proxy materials trustee nominees constituting up to the greater of two trustees or 20% of the number of trustees on the Board, provided that the shareholder and the nominees satisfy the eligibility requirements in our Bylaws. If you wish to nominate any person for election to our Board at the 20242025 Annual Meeting under the proxy access provision of our Bylaws, your nomination notice must be submitted to the Corporate Secretary no earlier than the close of business on October 24, 2023,26, 2024, and no later than the close of business on November 23, 2023,25, 2024, unless the date of mailing of the notice for the 20242025 Annual Meeting is movedadvanced by more than 30 days before or delayed by more than 60 days after the anniversary of the date of mailing of the notice for this year’s Annual Meeting, in which case the nomination must be delivered no earlier than the close of business on the 150th day and no later than the close of business on the later of the 120th day prior to the mailing of the notice for such meeting or the tenth day following the date we announce publicly the date of mailing of the notice for the 20242025 Annual Meeting.
Any proposal that a holder of our shares wishes to submit for inclusion in our 20242025 proxy statement (2024(2025 Proxy Statement) pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 must be received by Public Storage no later than November 23, 2023.25, 2024. Such proposals also must comply with SEC regulations under Rule 14a-8 regarding the inclusion of shareholder proposals in Company-sponsored proxy materials. Under Rule 14a-8, we are not required to include shareholder proposals in our proxy materials unless certain conditions specified in the rule are met.
In addition, notice of any proposal that a holder of our shares wishes to propose for consideration at the 20242025 Annual Meeting, but does not seek to include in the 20242025 Proxy Statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8, must be delivered to Public Storage no earlier than the close of business on November 23, 202325, 2024 and no later than the close of business on December 23, 202325, 2024 if the proposing holder of our shares wishes for Public Storage to describe the nature of the proposal in its 20242025 Proxy Statement as a condition to exercising its discretionary authority to vote proxies on the proposal. As with shareholder nominations of trustee candidates discussed above, if the date of mailing of the notice for the 20242025 Annual Meeting is movedadvanced by
86 | Public Storage | 2024 Proxy Statement
General Information About the Meeting
more than 30 days before or delayed by more than 60 days after the anniversary of the date of mailing of the notice for this year’s Annual Meeting, the shareholder proposal must be delivered no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day and no later than the close of business on the later of the 90th day prior to the mailing of the notice for such meeting or the tenth day following the date we announce publicly the date of mailing of the notice for the 20242025 Annual Meeting.
Any shareholder proposals or notices submitted to Public Storage in connection with the 20242025 Annual Meeting should be addressed to: Public Storage, 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201, Attention: Corporate Secretary.
HouseholdingPublic Storage | 2023 Proxy Statement | 101
General Information About the Meeting
HOUSEHOLDING
If you share an address with one or more other shareholders, you may have received notification that you will receive only a single copy of the Annual Report, Notice, and proxy statement for your entire household unless you have notified us that you wish to continue receiving individual copies. This practice, known as “householding,” is designed to reduce printing and mailing costs. If you would like to revoke your consent to “householding,” or if you are receiving multiple copies at your address and would like to enroll in “householding,” please submit your request to Public Storage, 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201, Attention: Corporate Secretary or call us at (818) 244-8080. If you own your shares in “street name,” please contact your broker, bank, trustee, or other intermediary to make your request.
Your Vote is ImportantYOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
We urge you to vote the accompanying proxy/instruction card and sign, date, and return it in the enclosed pre-addressed postage-prepaid envelope at your earliest convenience, whether or not you currently plan to attend the meeting in person.
102 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | 87
Appendix A – Non-GAAP Measures
APPENDIX A: Description of non-GAAP measures and reconciliation to GAAP measures |
Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement | A-1
Appendix A – Non-GAAP Measures
CORE FFO PER SHARE
We present “Core FFO per share,” a non-GAAP measure that represents diluted earnings per share excluding the impact of (i) depreciation expense, (ii) gains on the sale of real estate facilities, (iii) foreign currency exchange gains and losses, (iv) charges related to the redemption of preferred securities, and (v) certain other non-cash and/or nonrecurring income or expense items such as loss contingency accruals and casualties,resolution, due diligence costs incurred in pursuit of strategic transactions, unrealized gain on private equity investments, UPREIT reorganization costs, integration costs associated with our acquisition of Simply Self Storage, and our equity share of merger transactional costs, severancedeferred tax benefits of a senior executive, and lease termination income.change in tax status from our equity investee. We review Core FFO per share to evaluate our ongoing operating performance, and we believe investors and REIT analysts use it in a similar manner. However, Core FFO per share is not a substitute for net income per share. Because other REITs may not compute Core FFO per share in the same manner as we do, may not use the same terminology, or may not present such a measure, Core FFO per share may not be comparable among REITs.
The table below reconciles from diluted earnings per share to Core FFO per share.
2022 | ||||
Diluted earnings per share | $ | 23.50 | ||
Add back depreciation and amortization expense | 5.27 | |||
Deduct gains on disposition of real estate investments | (0.31 | ) | ||
Deduct gain on sale of equity investment in PS Business Parks, Inc. | (12.00 | ) | ||
Eliminate foreign currency and other noncore items | (0.54 | ) | ||
Core FFO per share | $ | 15.92 |
|
| 2023 |
| |
Diluted earnings per share |
| $ | 11.06 |
|
Add back depreciation and amortization expense |
|
| 5.64 |
|
Deduct gains on disposition of real estate investments |
|
| (0.10 | ) |
Eliminate foreign currency and other noncore items |
|
| 0.29 |
|
Core FFO per share |
| $ | 16.89 |
|
A-2 | Public Storage | 20232024 Proxy Statement
PUBLIC STORAGE
ATTN: INVESTOR SERVICES DEPARTMENT
701 WESTERN AVENUE
GLENDALE, CA 91201-2349
SCAN TO VIEW MATERIALS & VOTE VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 1, 20236, 2024 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2023May 2, 2024 for shares held in the 401(k) Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on May 1, 20236, 2024 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2023May 2, 2024 for shares held in the 401(k) Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
V01331-P86302 PUBLIC STORAGE V34012-P08639 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
— — — — —— — — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. The Board of Trustees recommends you vote FOR the following: For Against Abstain 1. Election of Trustees: 1a. Ronald L. Havner, Jr. O 0 0 1b. Tamara Hughes Gustavson 0 0 The Board of Trustees recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. For Against Abstain 1c. Shankh S. Mitra 0 0 2. Advisory resolution to approve the compensation of the Company's Named Executive Officers. O 0 0 3. 1d. Rebecca Owen 0 0 Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2024. 0 0 0 1e. Kristy M. Pipes O 0 1f. Avedick B. Poladian 0 0 Note: Other matters: In their discretion, the Proxies and/or the Trustee are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. 1g. John Reyes 0 0 1h. Joseph D. Russell, Jr. 0 0 1i. Tariq M. Shaukat O 1j. Ronald P. Spogli O 1k. Paul S. Williams 00 Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date |
PUBLIC STORAGE
| ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
| ||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be
Held on May 2, 2023:
7, 2024: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com.
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
V01332-P86302
V34013-P08639 PUBLIC STORAGE
701 Western Avenue
Glendale, California 91201-2349
This Proxy/Instruction Card is Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Trustees
The undersigned, a record holder of Common Shares of beneficial interest (“("Common Shares”Shares") of Public Storage and/or a participant in the PS 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”"401(k) Plan"), hereby (i) appoints Joseph D. Russell, Jr. and Nathaniel A. Vitan, or each of them, with power of substitution, as Proxies, to appear and vote, as designated on the reverse side, all the Common Shares held of record by the undersigned on March 13, 2023,5, 2024, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 2, 20237, 2024 (the “Annual Meeting”"Annual Meeting") and any adjournments thereof, and/or (ii) authorizes and directs the trustee of the 401(k) Plan (the “Trustee”"Trustee") to vote or execute proxies to vote, as instructed on the reverse side, all the Common Shares credited to the undersigned’sundersigned's account in the 401(k) Plan on March 13, 2023,5, 2024, at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments thereof. In their discretion, the Proxies and/or the Trustee are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting.
THE PROXIES AND/OR THE TRUSTEE WILL VOTE ALL THE COMMON SHARES TO WHICH THIS PROXY/INSTRUCTION CARD RELATES IN THE MANNER DIRECTED BY THE UNDERSIGNED. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN WITH RESPECT TO COMMON SHARES HELD OF RECORD BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THE PROXIES WILL VOTE SUCH COMMON SHARES FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES LISTED ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND IN FAVOR OF PROPOSALPROPOSALS 2 1 YEAR WITH RESPECT TO PROPOSAL 3, IN FAVOR OF PROPOSAL 4, AND AGAINST PROPOSAL 5.3. IF NO DIRECTION IS GIVEN WITH RESPECT TO THE COMMON SHARES CREDITED TO THE UNDERSIGNED’SUNDERSIGNED'S ACCOUNT UNDER THE 401(k) PLAN, THE TRUSTEE WILL VOTE SUCH COMMON SHARES IN THE SAME PROPORTION AS SHARES FOR WHICH VOTING INSTRUCTIONS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED, UNLESS REQUIRED BY LAW TO EXERCISE DISCRETION IN VOTING SUCH SHARES.
401(k) Plan Participants—TheParticipants-The undersigned, if a participant in the 401(k) Plan, hereby directs Principal Financial Group as Trustee for the 401(k) Plan to vote all Common Shares allocated to my account as of March 13, 2023.5, 2024. I understand that I am to mail this confidential voting instruction card to Broadridge, acting as tabulation agent or vote by phone or internet, as described on the reverse side of this card, and that my instructions must be received by Broadridge no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 27, 2023.May 2, 2024. If my instructions are not received by that time and date, or if the voting instructions are invalid because this form is not properly signed and dated, the shares in my account will be voted in accordance with the terms of the 401(k) Plan document.
The undersigned acknowledges receipt of the Notice of 20232024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and accompanying Proxy Statement.
CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE.